Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of aphid size, age and behaviour on host choice by the parasitoid wasp Ephedrus californicus: a test of host-size models

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

When host quality varies, parasitoid wasps are expected to oviposit selectively in high-quality hosts. We tested the assumption underlying host-size models that, for solitary species of wasps, quality is based on host size. Using Ephedrus californicus, a solitary endoparasitoid of the pea aphid, we evaluated the influence of aphid size (= mass), age and defensive behaviours on host selection. Experienced parasitoid females were given a choice among three classes of 5-day-old apterous nymphs: small aphids that had been starved daily for 4 h (S4) and 6 h (S6) respectively, and large aphids permitted to feed (F) normally. Wasps attacked more, and laid more eggs in, small than large aphids (S6>S4>F). This rank-order for attack did not change when females could choose among aphids of the same size that differed in age; however, wasps oviposited in all attacked aphids with equal probability. Host size did not influence parasitoid attack rates when aphids were anaesthetized so that they could not escape or defend themselves. As predicted by host-size models, wasp size increased with host size (F>S4; S6), but large wasps required longer to complete development than their smaller counterparts (S4<S6<F). For parasitoids of growing and feeding hosts (= koinobionts), host quality is not a linear function of current host size; it is influenced by the host's age and development stage which determine the host's potential to support parasitoid growth. Host choice in E. californicus reflects a trade-off between maximization of fitness gains per egg and the economics of search-time allocation. Because large aphids are more likely to escape parasitization, a wasp must balance her potential gain in fitness by ovipositinng in a high-quality (large) aphid against her potential cost in terms of lost opportunity time if the attack fails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Askew RR, Shaw MR (1986) Parasitoid communities: their size, structure and development. In: Waage J, Greathead D (eds) Insect parasitoids. Academic Press, London, pp 225–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellows TS Jr (1985) Effects of host age and host availability on developmental period, adult size, sex ratio, longevity and fecundity in Lariophagus distinguendus Förster (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Res Popul Ecol 27:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Brough CN, Dixon AFG (1990) The effects of starvation on development and reproductive potential of apterous virginoparae of vetch aphid, Megoura viciae. Entomol Exp Appl 55:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL, Los-Den Hartogh RL, Jones WT, van den Assem J (1981) Sex ratio evolution in a variable environment. Nature 289:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL, Skinner SW (1985) Complementary approaches to the understanding of parasitoid oviposition decisions. Environ Entomol 14:383–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow A, Mackauer M (1991) Patterns of host selection by four species of aphidiid (Hymenoptera) parasitoids: influence of host switching. Ecol Entomol 16 (in press)

  • Chow FJ, Mackauer M (1986) Host discrimination and larval competition in the aphid parasite Ephedrus californicus. Entomol Exp Appl 41:243–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier C, Lévesque CA, Eaves DM, Mackauer M (1991) Maternal adjustment of sex ratio in response to host size by the aphid parasitoid Ephedrus californicus. Can J Zool (in press)

  • Courtney SP, Kibota TT (1990) Mother doesn't know best: selection of hosts by ovipositing insects. In: Bernays EA (ed) Insect-plant interactions, vol II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl, pp 161–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerling D, Roitberg BD, Mackauer M (1990) Instar-specific defense of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum: influence on oviposition success of the parasite Aphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). J Insect Behavior 3:501–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine MT (1991) Preference of Ephedrus californicus for different instars of the pea aphid and its relationship to parasitoid fitness. Master of Pest Management thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC

  • Jones WT (1982) Sex ratio and host size in a parasitoid wasp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:207–210

    Google Scholar 

  • King BH (1988) Sex-ratio manipulation in response to host size by the parasitoid wasp Spalangia cameroni: a laboratory study. Evolution 42:1190–1198

    Google Scholar 

  • King BH (1990) Sex ratio manipulation by the parasitoid wasp Spalangia cameroni in response to host age: a test of the hostsize model. Evol Ecol 4:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1965) Selection for colonizing ability. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York London, pp 77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu SS (1985) Development, adult size and fecundity of Aphidius sonchi reared in two instars of its aphid host, Hyperomyzus lactucae. Entomol Exp Appl 37:41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer M (1972) Antennal amputation as a method for biomarking aphids. J Econ Entomol 65:1725–1727

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer M (1973) Host selection and host suitability in Aphidius smithi (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). In: Lowe AD (ed) Perspectives in aphid biology. Bull Entomol Soc New Zealand 2:20–29

  • Mackauer M (1983) Determination of parasite preference by choice tests: the Aphidius smithi (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae)—pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) model. Ann Entomol Soc Am 76:256–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer M (1986) Growth and developmental interactions in some aphids and their hymenopterous parasites. J Insect Physiol 32:275–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller HJ (1966) Über die Ursachen der unterschiedlichen Resistenz von Vicia faba L. gegenüber der Bohnenblattlaus, Aphis (Doralis) fabae Scop. IX. Der Einfluss ökologischer Faktoren auf das Wachstum von Aphis fabae Scop. Entomol Exp Appl 9:42–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Nechols JR, Kikuchi RS (1985) Host selection of the spherical mealybug (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) by Anagyrus indicus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae): influence of host stage on parasitoid oviposition, development, sex ratio, and survival. Environ Entomol 14:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp SB, Luck RF (1986) Effects of host size on selected fitness components of Aphytis melinus and A. lingnanensis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 79:700–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt G (1940) Experimental studies in insect parasitism. VII. The effects of different hosts on the parasite Trichogramma evanescens Westwood (Hym. Chalcidoidea). Proc Royal Entomol Soc London A, 15:81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira R, Mackauer M (1991a) Nutritional ecology of an insect host-parasitoid association: the pea aphid—Aphidius ervi system. Ecology (in press)

  • Sequeira R, Mackauer M (1991b) Covariance of adult size and development time in the parasitoid wasp Aphidius ervi in relation to the size of its host, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Evol Ecol (in press)

  • Shapiro M (1977) Immunity of insect hosts to insect parasites. In: Jackson GJ, Herman R, Singer I (eds) Immunity to parasitic animals, vol 1. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 211–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Slansky F Jr, Scriber JM (1985) Food consumption and utilization. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, vol 4. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 87–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edit. Freeman and Company, San Francisco CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagi M (1986) The reproductive strategy of the gregarious parasitoid, Pteromalus puparum (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). 2. Host size discrimination and regulation of the number and sex ratio of progeny in a single host. Oecologia 70:321–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AD (1988) Host effects on functional and ovipositional responses of Bracon hebetor. J Anim Ecol 57:173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Temerak SA (1984) Suitability of five lepidopteran host insects to the ectolarval parasitoid, Bracon brevicornis Wesmael. Z Angew Entomol 97:210–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SN (1985) Metabolic integration during the host associations of multicellular animal endoparasites. Comp Biochem Physiol 81B:21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SN (1986) Nutrition and in vitro culture of insect parasitoids. Ann Rev Entomol 31:197–219

    Google Scholar 

  • van Alphen JJM, Vet LEM (1986) An evolutionary approach to host finding and selection. In: Waage J, Greathead D (eds) Insect parasitoids. Academic Press, London, pp 23–61

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bergeijk KE, Bigler F, Kaashoek NK, Pak GA (1989) Changes in host acceptance and host suitability as an effect of rearing Trichogramma maidis on a factitious host. Entomol Exp Appl 52:229–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Waage JK, Godfray HJC (1985) Reproductive strategies and population ecology of insect parasitoids. In: Sibly RM, Smith RH (eds) Behavioural ecology. Ecological consequences of adaptive behaviour. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 449–470

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kouamé, K.L., Mackauer, M. Influence of aphid size, age and behaviour on host choice by the parasitoid wasp Ephedrus californicus: a test of host-size models. Oecologia 88, 197–203 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320811

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320811

Key words

Navigation