Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of superfluous information on children's solution of story arithmetic problems

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forty 6- to 7-year-old children were tested with single-step, addition/subtraction story problems with and without superfluous numerical information. Half of the children were allowed to find out the solution using objects and half were given pen and paper. Fewer problems with superfluous information than those without such information were solved accurately. Less than half of the problems were attempted with spontaneous modelling with objects and rarely were pen and paper used. In many cases, the use of objects could not facilitate solution of problems with superfluous information thus suggesting that in these cases children's failure to solve the problems could not be explained just by an increase in the cognitive demand for selective attention to, and memory of, the relevant information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BlankenshipC. S. and LovittT. C.: 1976, ‘Story problems: merely confusing or downright befudding?’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 7, 290–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, G. W.: 1981, Kindergarten and first-grade children's strategies for solving addition and subtraction problems in abstract and verbal problem contexts, Eric document ED 214 652.

  • Carpenter, T. P.: 1985, ‘Learning to add and subtract: An exercise in problem solving’, in E. A. Silver (ed.), Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.

  • Carpenter, T. P. and Moser, J. M.: 1982, ‘The development of addition and subtraction problem-solving skills’, in T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser and T. A. Romberg (eds.), Addition and Subtraction: A Cognitive Perspective, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.

  • CarpenterT. P. and MoserJ. M.: 1984, ‘The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 15, 179–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • CohenS. A. and StoverG.: 1981, ‘Effects of teaching sixth-grade students to modify format variables of mathematics word problems’, Reading Research Quarterly XVI/2, 175–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCorteE. and VerschaffelL.: 1987, ‘The effect of semantic structure on first graders' solution strategies of elementary addition and subtraction word problems’, Journal for Research in Mathematical Education 18, 363–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoodsteinH. A., CawleyJ. F., GordonS. and HelfgottJ.: 1971, ‘Verbal problem solving among educable mentally retarded children’, American Journal of Mental Deficiency 76, 208–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoodsteinH. A., BessantH., ThibodeanG., VitelloS. and VlahakosI.: 1972, ‘The effect of three variables on the verbal problem solving of educable mentally handicapped children’, American Journal of Mental Deficiency 76, 703–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • HebblerK.: 1977, ‘Young children's additon’, Journal of Children's Mathematical Behavior 1, 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • HiebertJ.: 1982, ‘The position of the unknown set and children's solutions of verbal arithmetic problems’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 13, 341–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • HiebertJ.: 1984, ‘Children's mathematics learning: the struggle to link form and understanding’, Elementary Schood Journal 84(5), 497–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • HughesM.: 1986, Children and Number: Difficulties in Learning Mathematics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • IbarraC. G. and LindvallC. M.: 1982, ‘Factors associated with the ability of kindergarten children to solve simple arithmetic story problems’, Journal of Educational Research 75, 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • JermanM.: 1973, ‘Problem length as a structural variable in verbal arithmetic problems’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 5, 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • JermanM. and ReesR.: 1972, ‘Predicting the relative difficulty of verbal arithmetic problems’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 4, 306–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • KintschW. and GreenoJ. G.: 1985, ‘Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems’, Psychological Review 92, 109–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • MuthK. D.: 1984, ‘Solving arithmetic word problems: role of reading in computational skills’, Journal of Educational Psychology 76, 205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • NesherP.: 1976, ‘Three determinants of difficulty in verbal arithmetic problems’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 7, 369–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • RileyM. S., GreenoJ. G. and HellerJ. I.: 1983, ‘Development of children's problem-solving ability in arithmetic’ in H. P.Ginsburg (ed.), The Development of Mathematical Thinking, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • SherrillJ. M.: 1983, ‘Solving textbook mathematical word problems’, Alberta Journal of Educational Research XXIX, 140–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • SieglerR. S. and ShragerJ.: 1984, ‘Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do?’, in C.Sophian (ed.), Origins of Cognitive Skills, LEA, Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweng, M. J.: 1979, Children's Strategies of Solving Verbal Problems, Eric document ED 178 359.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fung Lin, N.L. The effect of superfluous information on children's solution of story arithmetic problems. Educ Stud Math 21, 509–520 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315942

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315942

Keywords

Navigation