Skip to main content
Log in

Imperfectly optimal animals

A correction

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Janetos and Cole (1981) make several errors in their analysis. We point out these errors and supply the correct analysis. In doing so we illustrate techniques and ideas which can be usefully applied to many problems in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI (1980) Godzilla v. the creature from the black lagoon. In: Toates FM, Halliday TR (eds) The analysis of motivational processes. Academic Press, London, pp 297–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI, Kacelnik A, McNamara JM (1982) Some learning rules for acquiring information. In: McFarland DJ (ed) Functional ontogeny. Pitmans, London, pp 140–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI, McNamara JM (1981) How to maximize reward rate on two variable-interval paradigms. J Exp Anal Behav 35:367–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Janetos AC, Cole BJ (1981) Imperfectly optimal animals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:203–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns M, Miller RG (1963) Average renewal loss rate. Ann Math Stat 34:396–401

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JM, Houston AI (1980) The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour. J Theor Biol 85:673–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Staddon JER, Hinson JM, Kram R (1981) Optimal choice. J Exp Anal Behav 35:397–412

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Houston, A.I., McNamara, J.M. Imperfectly optimal animals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15, 61–64 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310216

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310216

Keywords

Navigation