Summary
The report presents the indications for prenatal diagnosis, the results from amniocentesis and details of outcome of pregnancy in 2036 women. Aneuploidy was found in 26 fetuses (1.3%) including 16 with trisomy 21 and 9 sex chromosome abnormalities. There were 38 balanced chromosomal rearrangements (1.9%): 23 of these (1.1%) were pericentric inversions of a number 9 chromosome. Only twoof the chromosomal abnormalities were found in other than those mothers referred for maternal age of 35 or over. Concern is expressed at the low referral rate for older mothers in the population served (only 25% of those over 40 years). Failure of amniotic cell culture occurred in 2.8% of cultures. Maternal cell contamination was detected in 23 cultures (1.1%) with four errors in reported fetal sex. Total error estimate was 0.5%. There were 20 in vitro artefacts (1.0%) with no reporting errors. Neural tube defects were identified in 28 fetuses and there were three false-positive and one false-negative results. Data on outcome of pregnancy was available from 1805 pregnancies (96.5%): 1295 were normal (71.7%) and 510 (28.3%) showed some abnormality. Pregnancy was terminated for fetal abnormality in 53 cases (2.9%) and fetal loss occurred in 65 (3.7%). Methods, quality control, safety and service considerations are discussed. It is suggested that amniocentesis should be restricted to centres where the greatest expertise is available. The service should be improved to meet the needs of a greater number of patients. The series is compared with other studies of over 1500 cases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boué J, Morer I, Laisney V, Boué A (1979) Diagnostic prenatal: Resultats de 1532 ponctions amniotiques et etude prospective de 1023 cas. Nour Presse Med 8: 2949–2953
Crandall BF, Lelrherz TB, Rubinstein L, Robertson RD, Sample WF, Sarti D, Howard J (1980) Chromosome findings in 2500 second-trimester amniocenteses. Amer J Med Genet 5: 345–356
Daniel A, Stewart L, Saville T, Brookwell R, Paull H, Purvis-Smith S, Lam-Po-Tang PRLC (1982) Prenatal diagnosis in 3000 women for chromosome, X-linked and metabolic disorders. Amer J Med Genet 11: 61–75
Galjaard H (1976) European experience with prenatal diagnosis of congenital disease: a survey of 6121 cases. Cytogenet Cell Genet 16: 453–467
Golbus NS, Loughman WD, Epstein CJ, Halbasch G, Stephens JD, Hall BD (1979) Prenatal genetic diagnosis in 3000 amniocenteses. N Eng J Med 300: 157–163
Gregson NM (1970) A technique for culturing cells from amniotic fluid. Lancet 1: 84
Gregson NM, Johnson M (1980) Culture of bloody amniotic fluid for chromosome analysis: an improved method. J Med Genet 17: 388
Hamerton JL, Boué A, Cohen MM, De La Chapelle A, Hsu LY, Lindsten J, Mikkelsen M, Robinson A, Stengel-Rutkowski D, Webb T, Wiley A, Worton R (1980) Chromosome disease. Prenat Diag Special Issue, pp 11–21
Hook EB, Chambers G (1977) Estimated rates of Down syndrome in live births by one year maternal age intervals for mothers aged 20–39 in a New York State study—Implications of risk figures for genetic counselling and cost benefit analysis of prenatal diagnosis programs. In: Bergsma D (ed) Numerical taxonomy of birth defects and polygenic disorders. Birth Defects, Original Article Series: Vol XII, part 3 A. National Foundation—March of Dimes, Alan R Liss, New York, pp 249–267
Littlefield JW, Milunsky A, Atkins L (1974) An overview of prenatal genetic diagnosis. In: Motulsky AG, Lenz W (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference of Birth Defects. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 221–225
MRC, Great Britain (1978) An assessment of the hazards of amniocentesis. Br J Obstet Gynecol 85: Suppl No. 2
NICHD (1976) Mid trimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis: safety and accuracy. JAMA 236: 1471–1477
Polani PE, Alberman E, Alexander BJ, Benson PF, Berry AC, Blunt S, Daker MG, Fensom AH, Garrett DM, McGuire VM, Fraser Roberts JA, Seller MJ, Singer JD (1979) Sixteen years experience of counselling, diagnosis and prenatal detection in one genetic centre, progress, results, and problems. J Med Genet 16: 166–175
Quebec International Workshop (1980) Prenatal diagnosis, past, present and future. Report of an International Workshop, Quebec, 1979. Hammerton JL, Simpson NE (eds). Prenat Diag Special Issue
Ridler MAC, Sutton S (1981) A case of a paracentric inversion inv(7) (q11q22). Prenatal detection and counselling. Prenat Diag 1: 81–84
Simoni G, Fraccaro M, Arslanian A, Bachetta M, Baccichetti C, Bignone FA, Cagiano A, Carbonara AO, Carozzi F, Cuoco C, Dagna Bricarelli F, Dallapiccola B, Dalpra L, Doria Lamba Carbone L, Ferranti G, Filippi G Frateschi M, Gimelli G Gualtieri RM, Lenzini E, Micara G, Migone N, Montacuti V, Neri G, Papa R, Pecile V, Rocchi M, Savin E, Serra A, Tenconi R, Terzoli GL, Tibiletti MG (1982) Cytogenetic findings in 4952 prenatal diagnoses. An Italian collaborative study. Hum Genet 60: 63–68
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Squire, J.A., Nauth, L., Ridler, M.A.C. et al. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy in 2036 women investigated by amniocentesis. Hum Genet 61, 215–222 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00296445
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00296445