Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of iodine-123 low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and indium-111 LDL binding to mononuclear cells of healthy normolipaemic controls and patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The binding of radiolabelled lipoproteins, iodine-123-labelled low-density. lipoprotein (LDL) and indium-111-labelled LDL, to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNCs) was compared in normolipaemic subjects and in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). 123I-LDL and 111In-LDL binding to MNCs exhibited high-affinity, highly specific, time- and temperature-dependent binding reaching saturation at concentrations above 50 nM. The number of LDL binding sites (Bmax) was significantly (P<0.01) lower in FH patients (P<0.001; 123I-LDL: Bmax 279±44 ng protein/108MNCs; 111In-LDL: Bmax 309±43 ng protein/108MNCs) as compared with controls (123I-LDL: Bmax 2874±246 ng protein/108 MNCs; 111In-LDL: Bmax 3145±339 ng protein/108 MNCs). The corresponding dissociation constants (K d) were 16±8 nM for 123I-LDL and 12±6 nM for 123In-LDL in healthy volunteers (123In-LDL vs 111In-LDL, P<0.05). In FH patients, the K d values were 20±8 nM for 123I-LDL and 16±6 nM for 123In-LDL (P<0.05 vs controls for both 123I-LDL and 111In-LDL). 111In-LDL binding to MNCs was inhibited (IC50) by 30±8 nM in healthy controls and 38±12 nM in FH patients (P<0.05). 123In-LDL binding to MNCs was inhibited (IC50) by 34±8 nM in healthy controls and 46±10 nM in FH patients (P<0.05). Taken together, these results suggest a reduced number of LDL receptors expressed on MNCs from FH patients. We conclude that 111In-LDL and 123I-LDL are equally well suited as a probe of receptor-mediated binding and uptake of LDL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science 1986;232: 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. How LDL receptors influence cholesterol and atherosclerosis. Sci Am 1984;251: 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Canner PL, Berge KG, Wenger NK. Fifteen year mortality in Coronary Drug Project patients: long-term benefit with niacin. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;8: 1245–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frick M, Elo O, Happa K, et al. Helsinki Heart Study: primary prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia. Safety of treatment, changes in risk factors and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1987;317: 1237–1245.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Virgolini I, Angelberger P, Li SR, et al. Indium-111-labeled low-density lipoprotein binds with higher affinity to the human liver as compared to iodine-123-low-density-labeled lipoprotein. J Nucl Med 1991;32: 2132–2138.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Virgolini I, Li SR, Yang Q, et al. Binding of 111In-labeled low density lipoprotein (LDL) to platelets of normolipemic volunteers and patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Arteriosclerosis 1993;13: 536–547.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Havel RJ, Eder HA, Bragdon JH. The distribution and chemical composition of ultracentrifugally separated lipoproteins in human serum. J Clin Invest 1955;34: 1345–1353.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lowry OH, Rosenbrough OH, Farr AL, Randall RL. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951;193: 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boyum A. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Scand J Clin Invest 1968;21: 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Virgolini I, Angelberger P, Lupattelli G, et al. Comparison of different methods for LDL isolation and radioiodination on liver LDL receptor binding in vitro. Nucl Med Biol 1991;18: 513–517.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scatchard G. The attraction of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann NYAcad Sci 1949;51: 660–672.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Familial hypercholesterolemia: defective binding of lipoproteins to cultured fibroblasts associated with impaired regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1974;71: 788–792.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ho YK, Brown MS, Bilheimer DW, Goldstein JL. Regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor activity in freshly isolated human lymphocytes. J Clin Invest 1976;58: 1465–1474.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lupattelli G, Virgolini I, Li S, et al. Low density lipoprotein receptors: preliminary results on “in vivo” study. Wien Min Wochenschr 1991;103: 462–465.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koller E, Koller F, Binder BR. Purification and identification of the lipoprotein-binding proteins from human blood platelets. J Biol Chem 1989;264: 12412–12418.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banyai, M., Lupattelli, G., Li, S.R. et al. Comparison of iodine-123 low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and indium-111 LDL binding to mononuclear cells of healthy normolipaemic controls and patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Eur J Nucl Med 21, 634–639 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00285585

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00285585

Key words

Navigation