Skip to main content
Log in

Retrotransposon-induced ectopic expression of the Om(2D) gene causes the eye-specific Om(M) phenotype in Drosophila ananassae

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Molecular and General Genetics MGG Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optic morphology (Om) mutations in Drosophila ananassae map to at least 22 loci, which are scattered throughout the genome. Om mutations are all semidominant, neomorphic, nonpleiotropic, and associated with the insertion of a retrotransposon, tom. We have found that the Om(2D) gene encodes a novel protein containing histidine/proline repeats, and is ubiquitously expressed during embryogenesis. The Om(2D) RNA is not detected in wild-type eye imaginal discs, but is abundantly found in the center of the eye discs of Om(2D) mutants, where excessive cell death occurs. D. melanogaster flies transformed with the Om(2D) cDNA under control of the hsp70 promoter display abnormal eye morphology when heat-shocked at the third larval instar stage. These results suggest that the Om(2D) gene is not normally expressed in the eye imaginal discs, but its ectopic expression, induced by the tom element, in the eye disc of third instar larvae results in defects in adult eye morphology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Awasaki T, Juni N, Hamabata T, Yoshida K, Matsuda M, Tobari YN, Hori SH (1994) Retrotransposon-induced ectopic expression of cut causes the Om(1 A) mutant in Drosophila ananassae. Genetics 137:165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Blochlinger K, Jan LY, Jan YN (1993) Postembryonic patterns of expression of cut, a locus regulating sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Development 117:441–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos-Ortega JA, Hartenstein V (1985) The embryonic development of Drosophila melanogaster. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavener DR (1987) Comparison of the consensus sequence flanking translational start sites in Drosophila and vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Res 15:1353–1361

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran LM, Adams JM, Dunn AR, Cory S (1984) Murine T lymphomas in which the cellular myc oncogene has been activated by retroviral insertion. Cell 37:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter DE, Swaykus EA, Beran-Koehn MA, Goldberg D, Wieschaus E, Schedl P (1990) Molecular analysis of odd-skipped, a zinc finger encoding segmentation gene with a novel pairrule expression pattern. EMBO J 8:3795–3804

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronmiller C, Schedl P, Cline TW (1988) Molecular characterization of daughterless, a Drosophila sex determination gene with multiple roles in development. Genes Dev 2:1666–1676

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar BA, Schubiger G (1986) Parameters controlling transcriptional activation during early Drosophila development. Cell 44:871–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Frigerio G, Burri M, Bopp D, Baumgartner S, Noll M (1986) Structure of the segmentation gene paired and the Drosophila PRD gene set as part of a gene network. Cell 47:735–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita SC, Zipursky SL, Benzer S, Ferrus A, Shotwell SL (1982) Monoclonal antibodies against the Drosophila nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:7929–7933

    Google Scholar 

  • Golemis EA, Speck NA, Hopkins N (1990) Alignment of U3 region sequences of mammalian type C viruses: identification of highly conserved motifs and implications for enhancer design. J Virol 64:534–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Henikoff S (1984) Unidirectional digestion with exonuclease III creates targeted breakpoints for DNA sequencing. Gene 28:351–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Higashijima S, Kojima T, Michiue T, Ishimaru S, Emori Y, Saigo K (1992) Dual Bar homeo box genes of Drosophila required in two photoreceptor cells, R1 and R6, and primary pigment cells for normal eye development. Genes Dev 6:50–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton CW (1984) Morphogenetically specific mutability in Drosophila ananassae. Genetics 106:631–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton CW (1988) Formal relations between Om mutants and their suppressors in Drosophila ananassae. Genetics 120:1035–1042

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultmark D, Klemenz R, Gehring WJ (1986) Translational and transcriptional control elements in the untranslated leader of the heat-shock gene hsp22. Cell 44:429–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito H, Hamabata T, Hori SH (1993) Transcriptional activation of the Drosophila melanogaster glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase gene by insertion of defective P elements. Mol Gen Genet 241:637–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Janknecht R, Sander C, Pongs O (1991) (HX)n repeats: a pH-controlled protein-protein interaction motif of eukaryotic transcription factors? FEBS Lett 295:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Janknecht R, Taube W, Ludecke HJ, Pongs O (1989) Characterization of a putative transcription factor gene expressed in the 20-OH-ecdysone inducible puff 74EF in Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res 17:4455–4464

    Google Scholar 

  • Karess RE, Rubin GM (1984) Analysis of P transposable element functions in Drosophila. Cell 38:135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojima T, Ishimaru S, Higasijima S, Takayama E, Akimaru H, Sone M, Emori Y, Saigo K (1991) Identification of a different-type homeobox gene, BarH1, possibly causing Bar(B) and Om(1D) mutations in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:4343–4347

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer H, Zipursky L (1992) Whole mount in situ hybridization to imaginal discs using digoxygenin labeled DNA probes. Drosophila Inf Serv 71:147

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsubayashi H, Juni N, Usui K, Hori SH, Tobari YN (1991 a) Molecular and histological characterizations of the Om(2D) mutants in Drosophila ananassae. Mol Gen Genet 227:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsubayashi H, Tobari YN, Hori SH (1991 b) Genetic analysis of the Om(2D) locus in Drosophila ananassae. Jpn J Genet 66:387–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsubayashi H, Matsuda M, Tomimura Y, Shibata M, Tobari YN (1992) Cytological mapping of Om mutants of Drosophila ananassae. Jpn J Genet 67:259–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Nusse R (1988) The int genes in mammary tumorigenesis and in normal development. Trends Genet 4:291–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohura T, Kominami E, Katunuma N (1983) A new sensitive and convenient assay of ornithine aminotransferase. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 29:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Okayama H, Kawaichi M, Brownstein M, Lee F, Yokota T, Arai K (1987) High-efficiency cloning of full-length cDNA; construction and screening of cDNA expression libraries for mammalian cells. Methods Enzymol 154:3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirrotta V, Steller H, Bozzetti MP (1985) Multiple upstream regulatory elements control the expression of the Drosophila white gene. EMBO J 4:3501–3508

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin GM, Spradling AC (1982) Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science 218:348–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrimpton AE, Montgomery EA, Langley CH (1986) Om mutations in Drosophila ananassae are linked to inserions of a transposable element. Genetics 114:125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreij THE (1971) Cell death during the development of the imaginal disks of Calliphora erythrocephala. Neth J Zool 21:221–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanda S, Corces VG (1991) Retrotransposon-induced overexpression of a homeobox gene causes defects in eye morphogenesis in Drosophila. EMBO J 10:407–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanda S, Shrimpton AE, Hinton CW, Langley CH (1989) Analysis of the Om(1 D) locus in Drosophila ananassae. Genetics 123:495–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanda S, Leshko LA, Corces VG, Hori SH (1993) Optic morphology (Om) mutations. In: Tobari YN (ed) Drosophila ananassae, genetical and biological aspects. Japan Scientific Societies Press; Tokyo and Karger, Basel, pp 89–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz D, Pfeifle C (1989) A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma 98:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Gralla JD (1991) Differential ability of proximal and remote element pairs to cooperate in activating RNA polymerase. Mol Cell Biol 11:4561–4571

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by B. H. Judd

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoshida, K., Juni, N., Awasaki, T. et al. Retrotransposon-induced ectopic expression of the Om(2D) gene causes the eye-specific Om(M) phenotype in Drosophila ananassae . Molec. Gen. Genet. 245, 577–587 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282220

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282220

Key words

Navigation