Skip to main content
Log in

Ethylene and in vitro culture of potato: suppression of ethylene generation vastly improves protoplast yield, plating efficiency and transient expression of an alien gene

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethylene release by potato shoots cultured in closed boxes was suppressed by the addition of silver thiosulfate to the culture medium. Shoots cultured in the presence of silver thiosulfate produced appreciably more tissue and the yield of protoplasts per unit tissue mass was vastly increased, resulting in an 8 fold increase of protoplast yield per shoot. Exposure of pricked leaves to macerating enzymes facilitated ethylene generation. Leaves of shoots which were previously cultured in silver thiosulfate containing medium generated much less ethylene than leaves from control shoots and this generation could be further reduced by the addition of acetylsalicylic acid during maceration. The capability of polyethylene glycol treated potato protoplasts to produce microcalli was vastly increased by the addition of silver thiosulfate during exposure of protoplasts to Ca(NO3)2 following the polyethylene glycol treatment. Similarly, when a plasmid (pCAP212) containing an expressible gene for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase was introduced into potato protoplasts through a polyethylene glycol treatment, the transient expression of acetyltransferase was very much increased by the addition of a short incubation of the protoplasts with silver thiosulfate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AOA:

(aminooxy)acetic acid

ASA:

acetylsalicylic acid

AVG:

aminoethoxyvinyl-glycine

CAT:

chloramphenicol acetyltransferase

MV:

methyl viologen

PEG:

polyethylene glycol

STS:

silver thiosulfate

References

  • Adams TL, Townsend SA (1983) Plant Cell Rep 2: 165–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammirato PV (1983) In: Evans DA, Sharp WR, Ammirato PV, Yamada Y (eds) Handbook of Plant Tissue Culture Vol 1, Macmillan, New York. pp 82–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JD, Chalutz E, Mattoo AK (1985) In: Cellular and Molecular Biology of Plant Stress, Alan R Liss Inc. New York, NY, pp 263–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JD, Mattoo AK, Lieberman M (1982) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 107: 588–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Aviv D, Galun E (1985) J Heredity 76: 135–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer EM Jr (1976) Plant Physiol 58: 268–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer EM Jr (1979) Plant Physiol 63: 169–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Binding H, Nehls R, Schieder O, Sopory SK, Wenzel G (1978) Physiol Plant 43: 52–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassells AC, Cocker FM, Austin S (1980) Plant Sci Lett 19: 169–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Facciotti D, Pilet PE (1981) Z. Pflanzenphysiol 104: 401–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Frearson EM, Power JB, Cocking EC (1973) Develop Biol 33: 130–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Galun E, Perl A, Aviv D (1988) In: Applications of Plants Cell and Tissue Culture (Ciba Foundation Symposium 137) Wiley, pp 97–112 (in press)

  • Herrera-Estrella L, Depicker A, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1983) Nature 303: 209–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey G, Stacey NJ (1981) Ann Bot 48: 787–796

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey G, Stacey NJ (1984) Ann Bot 53: 565–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Imaseki H (1986) In: Takahashi N. (ed) Chemistry of Plant Hormones. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 249–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii S (1987) In Vitro Cell Develop Biol 23: 653–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KM, Michayluk MR (1975) Planta 126: 105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger-Lebus S, Potrykus I (1987) Plant Mol Biol Rep 5: 289–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentini Z, Mussell H, Mutschler MA, Earle ED (1988) Plant Sci 54: 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie CA, Romani RJ (1986) Plant Cell Rep 5: 144–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussell H, Earle E, Campbell L, Batts LA (1986) Plant Sci 47: 207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy JF, Maliga P (1976) Z Pflanzenphysiol 78: 453–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Perl A, Aviv D, Galun E (1988) Proc Intern Congress of Plant Tissue Culture-Tropical Crops, Bogota, September 21–25, 1987 (in press)

  • Purnhauser L, Medgyesy P, Czako M, Dix PJ, Marton L (1987) Plant Cell Rep 6: 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitch HD, Fridovich I (1983) Photobiol. 37: 679–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Velten J, Schell J (1985) Nucleic Acid Res 13: 6981–6997

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by E. D. Earle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perl, A., Aviv, D. & Galun, E. Ethylene and in vitro culture of potato: suppression of ethylene generation vastly improves protoplast yield, plating efficiency and transient expression of an alien gene. Plant Cell Reports 7, 403–406 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269523

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269523

Keywords

Navigation