Skip to main content
Log in

Superior efficacy of trimelamol to hexamethylmelamine in human ovarian cancer xenografts

  • Original Articles
  • Hexamethylmelamine, Trimelamol, Ovarian Cancer, Xenografts
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A series of eight human ovarian cancer lines grown in nude mice were used to compare the activity of hexamethylmelamine (HMM) and N 2,N 4,N 6-trihydroxy methyl-N 2,N 4,N 6-trimethylmelamine (trimelamol). The tumor lines differed in histological subtype and growth rate. The drugs were administered i.p. at the maximum tolerated dose at alternate days. Differences in volume of treated and control tumors were endpoints of the study. The tumor lines varied widely in sensitivity to HMM and in four lines a T/C% below 25% was achieved. Trimelamol appeared to be more active than HMM and achieved a T/C below 25% in seven tumor lines. Thus far, the drug has demonstrated significant activity in a phase I trial in ovarian cancer patients. Comparative clinical studies of HMM vs trimelamol have not yet been performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ames MM, Sanders ME, Tiede WS (1981) Metabolic activation of hexamethylmelamine and pentamethylmelamine by live microsomal preparations. Life Sci 29: 1591

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonomi PD, Mladineo J, Morrin B, Wilbanks G, Slayton RE (1979) Phase II trial of hexamethylmelamine in ovarian carcinoma resistant to alkylating agents. Cancer Treat Rep 63: 137

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boven E, Van der Vijgh WJF, Nauta MM, Schlüper HMM, Pinedo HM (1985) Comparative activity and distribution studies of five platinum analogues in nude mice bearing human ovarian carcinoma xenografts. Cancer Res 45: 86

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boven E, Nauta MM, Schlüper HMM, Elferink F, Van der Vijgh WJF, Pinedo HM (1985) Secondary screening of platinum compounds in human ovarian cancer xenografts in nude mice. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 21: 1253

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buckley SM, Stock CC, Crossley ML, Rhoads CP (1952) Inhibition of the Crocker mouse sarcoma 180 by certain ethylenimine derivatives and related compounds. Cancer 5: 144

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casper ES, Gralla RJ, Lynch GR, Jones BR, Woodcock TM, Gordon C, Kelsen DP, Young CW (1981) Phase I and pharmacological studies of pentamethylmelamine administered by 24-hour intravenous infusion. Cancer Res 41: 1402

    Google Scholar 

  7. Connors TA, Cumber AJ, Ross WCJ, Clarke SA, Mitchley BCV (1977) Regression of human lung tumor xenografts induced by water-soluble analogs of hexamethylmelamine. Cancer Treat Rep 61: 927

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cumber AJ, Ross WCJ (1977) Analogues of hexamethylmelamine. The anti-neoplastic activity of derivatives with enhanced water solubility. Chem Biol Interact 17: 349

    Google Scholar 

  9. D'Incalci M, Bolis G, Mangioni C, Morasca L, Garattini S (1978) Variable oral absorption of hexamethylmelamine in man. Cancer Treat Rep 62: 2117

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eva A, Robbins KC, Andersen PR, Srinivasan A, Tronick SR, Reddy EP, Ellmore NW, Galen AT, Lautenberger JA, Papas TS, Westin EH, Wong-Staal F, Gallo RC, Aaronson SA (1982) Cellular genes analogous to retroviral one genes are transcribed in human tumour cells. Science 295: 116

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg RS, Griffin JP, McSherry JW, Krakoff IH (1980) Phase I study of pentamethylmelamine. Cancer Treat Rep 64: 1319

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson BL, Fisher RI, Bender RA, DeVita VT, Chabner BA, Young RC (1978) Hexamethylmelamine in alkylating agentresistant ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 42: 2157

    Google Scholar 

  13. Judson IR, Rutty CJ, Abel G, Gumbrell L, Harrap KR, Calvert AH (1985) Report on the Phase I trial of N 2,N 4,N 6-trihydroxymethyl-N 2,N 4,N 6-trimethylmelamine (trimelamol). Br J Cancer 52: 466

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klippert PJM, Hulshoff A, Mingels MJJ, Hofman G, Noordhoek J (1983) Low oral bioavailability of hexamethylmelamine in the rat due to simultaneous hepatic and intestinal metabolism. Cancer Res 43: 3160

    Google Scholar 

  15. Legha SS, Slavik M, Carter SK (1976) Hexamethylmelamine. An evaluation in its role in the therapy of cancer. Cancer 38: 27

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muindi JRF, Newell DR, Smith IE, Harrap KR (1983) Pentamethylmelamine (PMM): Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic studies. Br J Cancer 47: 27

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neyt JP, Ten Bokkel Huinink WW, van der Burg MEL, Van Oosterom AT, Vriesendorp R, Kooyman CD, Van Lindert ACM, Hamerlynck JVTH, Van Lent M, Van Houwelingen JC, Pinedo HM (1984) Randomized trial comparing two combination chemotherapy regimens (Hexa-CAF vs CHAP-5) in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Lancet 2: 594

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rutty CJ, Newell DR, Muindi JRF, Harrap KR (1983) The comparative pharmacokinetics of pentamethylmelamine in man, rat, and mouse. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 8: 105

    Google Scholar 

  19. Van Echo DA, Chiuten DF, Whitacre M, Aisner J, Lichtenfeld JL, Wiernik PH (1980) Phase I trial of pentamethylmelamine in patients with previously treated malignancies. Cancer Treat Rep 64: 1335

    Google Scholar 

  20. Young RC, Chabner BA, Hubbard SP, Fisher RI, Bender RA, Anderson T, Simon RM, Canellos GP, DeVita VT (1978) Advanced ovarian carcinoma. A prospective clinical trial of melphalan (L0PAM) versus combination chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 299: 1261

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boven, E., Nauta, M.M., Schlüper, H.M.M. et al. Superior efficacy of trimelamol to hexamethylmelamine in human ovarian cancer xenografts. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 18, 124–128 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262280

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262280

Keywords

Navigation