Skip to main content
Log in

Central station data displays: an experimental evaluation of observer performance

Part 2: Factors affecting performance, and a comparison of analogue and digital data

  • Originals
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

16 experienced ICU nurses monitored simulated central station VDU displays for the occurrence of ectopic beats and for signs of deterioration in general cardiovascular status. Each period of monitoring lasted for 1 h, and on separate occasions each nurse monitored 1, 2, 4 or 6 displays simultaneously. For primary clinical tasks, the data showed that the nurses' performance improved with each test. The identification of ventricular ectopic beats (VEBs) improved within the 1 h of each test except when 6 screens were being viewed simultaneously, with a similar result for the identification of deterioration of cardiovascular status. The nurses showed a marked preference for analogue signals over digits for the identification of VEBs. The highest priority clinical task was the identification of deteriorating cardiovascular status. When this task was performed efficiently less attention was given to minor tasks, and the nurse rated herself as very tired.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Casey E, Wickens CD (1986) Visual display representation of multidimensional systems: the effect of information correlation and display integrality. Techn Rep CPC-86-2. Prepared for the US Army Res Inst

  2. Crew AD, Stoodley KDC, Naghdy F, Unsworth GD (1984) Preliminary studies in the identification of cardiac status in a cardiac surgical intensive therapy unit. Intensive Care Med 10:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crew AD, Old S, Craig A, Unsworth GD, Fletcher PC (1989) central station data displays: an experimental evaluation of observer performance. Part 1. Number of displays and observation time. Intensive Care Med 15:314–318

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacob RJK, Egeth HE, Bevon W (1986) The face as a data display. Hum Factors 18:189–200

    Google Scholar 

  5. Naghdy F, Stoodley KDC, Henry RM, Crew AD (1984) Development of a microprocessor-based monitoring system for postsurgical cardiac patients. J Microcomp App 7:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stoodley KDC; Naghdy F, Crew AD (1982) Monitoring of cardiovascular variables in a post-surgical cardiac intensive care unit. In: Anderson OD (ed) Time series analysis: theory and practice I. North-Holland, Amsterdam Oxford New York, pp 123–137

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stoodley KDC, Lu R, Crew AD, Henry RM (1984) A microprocessor-based immediate alarm system for post-surgical cardiac patients. In: Quetglas GM, Macfarlane PW, Perez de Talens AF, Aguilar JC (eds) The application of computers in cardiology: state of the art and new perspectives. Elsevier (North-Holland), Amsterdam, pp 385–388

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wickens CD (1987) Attention. In: Hancock PA (ed) Human factors psychology. Elsevier (North-Holland), Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  9. Winer BJ (1962) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, NY

    Google Scholar 

  10. Woods DD, Wise JA, Hanes LF (1981) An evaluation of nuclear power plant safety parameter display systems. Proc Hum Factors Soc 25:110–114

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crew, A.D., Old, S., Craig, A. et al. Central station data displays: an experimental evaluation of observer performance. Intensive Care Med 15, 379–384 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261497

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261497

Key words

Navigation