Skip to main content
Log in

Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reaching out for an object is often described as consisting of two components that are based on different visual information. Information on the object's position and orientation guides the hand to the object, while information on the object's shape and size determines how the fingers move relative to the thumb to grasp it. We propose an alternative description, which consists of determining suitable positions on the object — on the basis of its shape, surface texture, and so on — and then moving one's thumb and fingers to these positions. This could lead to the same performance without requiring distinct visual information on the object's orientation or size. If so, an illusory change in size need not influence the distance between thumb and fingers when reaching out for an object. However, as the object's size is used to estimate its weight, the illusory change in size should influence the force that is exerted to lift the object. To find out whether this is so, eight subjects were asked to pick up brass disks from a fixed position straight in front of them. The illusory change in size was brought about by presenting five converging lines in two different configurations under the disks. As predicted, the illusion influenced the force used to lift the disks, but not the distance between the subjects' thumbs and fingers when reaching for the disks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams RA, Landgraf JZ (1990) Differential use of distance and location information for spatial localization. Percept Psychophys 47:349–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Aglioti S, DeSouza JFX, Goodale MA (1995) Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 5:679–685

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (1996) Hitting moving targets: co-operative control of “when” and “where”. Hum Mov Sci 15:39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner E, Van den Berg AV,DammeWvan (1996) Perceived motion in depth. Vision Res 36:699–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman B, Lewis S, Heit G, Nagle M (1979) Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5:692–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman B, Kirch M, Sperling A (1981) Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Percept Psychophys 29:336–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15:20–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Pelisson D, Prablanc C (1986) Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320:748–750

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AM, Forssberg H, Johansson RS, Westling G (1991a) Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 83:477–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AM, Forssberg H, Johansson RS, Westling G (1991b) Integration of sensory information during the programming of precision grip: comments on the contributions of size cues. Exp Brain Res 85:226–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Iberall T, Bingham G, Arbib MA (1986) Opposition space as a structuring concept for the analysis of skilled hand movements. In: Heuer H, Fromm C (eds) Generation and modulation of action patterns. (Experimental Brain Research series, vol 15) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 158–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1986) The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern. Behav Brain Res 19:99–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M, Paulignan Y, Mackenzie C, Marteniuk RM (1992) Parallel visuomotor processing in human prehension movements. In: Caminiti R, Johnson PB, Burnod Y (eds) Control of arm movement in space: neurophysiological and computational approaches. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G (1984) Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56:550–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone M, Hubel D (1988) Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science 240:740–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JM, Da Silvva JA, Fujita N, Fukusima SS (1992) Visual space perception and visually directed action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:906–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (1995) Perception and action based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeki S, Shipp S (1988) The functional logic of cortical connections. Nature 335:311–317

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brenner, E., Smeets, J.B.J. Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Exp Brain Res 111, 473–476 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228737

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228737

Key words

Navigation