Skip to main content
Log in

The role of pith, tube, and stalk density in determining sugarcane sucrose content and stalk weight

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Selection against pith and tube is one of the major criteria used to eliminate inferior sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivars in early stages of new cultivar evaluation. Understanding the genetic relationships for these traits would facilitate crossing and selection decisions. This study was conducted to determine heritability, genetic coefficient of variation, and the potential for genetic advance by selection for pith, tube, and stalk density. Correlation and path-coefficient analysis studies were conducted to determine the effects of Brix, pith, and stalk density on sucrose content and the effects of stalk volume, tube, and pith on stalk weight. Eighty randomly selected cultivars (four progeny from each of 20 crosses), representing a first clonal stage of a Louisiana sugarcane breeding population, and their parents were planted at St. Gabriel/LA, and yield data were collected in 1986, 1987, and 1988. Pith and tube exhibited large genotype and genotype-by-year variation, whereas variation in stalk density was nonsignificant. Broad-sense and narrow-sense heritabilities were high, moderately high, and low for pith, tube, and stalk density, respectively. Path-coefficient analysis revealed that stalk volume was the major factor determining stalk weight. Tube and pith were factors that decreased stalk weight. As expected, Brix was the single most important factor determining sucrose content, however, high stalk density and low pith were also associated with high sucrose content. Sugarcane breeders should practice stringent selection for low pith across years to increase stalk weight and sucrose content. Since stalk density was effectively increased by high sucrose content and low pith, the use of stalk density in breeding and selection should be avoided. The minimal effect of tube on stalk weight suggests that its use as selection criteria be minimized or dropped.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard RW (1960) Principles of plant breeding. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker WA (1984) Manual of quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Academic Enterprises, Pullman/WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Breaux RD (1972) Selecting commercial sugarcane varieties from large seedling and clonal populations. Proc Am Soc Sugarcane Technol 2(ns):58–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Breaux RD, Matherne RJ, Millhollon RW, Jackson RD (1972) Culture of sugarcane for sugar production in the Mississippi delta. USDA Agric Handbook No. 417

  • Dewey DR, Lu KH (1959) A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agron J 51:515–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson GE (1969) Techniques in research in quantitative animal genetics. In: Techniques and procedures in animal production research. American Society of Animal Science, Champaign/IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillewijn CV (1952) Botany of sugarcane. Chronica Botanica, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley JW, Moll RH (1969) Interpretation and use of estimates of heritability and genetic variances in plant breeding. Crop Sci 9:257–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt NL, Rao JT (1950) Progeny tests and inheritance of pith in sugarcane seedlings. Proc 1st Biennial Conf Sugar Res, India, Part I

  • Evans H (1966) The incidence of pithiness in sugarcane and its effect on yield and quality. Proc Br West Indies Sugar Technol 1:119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) An introduction to quantitative genetics. 2nd edn. Longman Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1981) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames/IA

    Google Scholar 

  • Imran M (1986) Heritability of flowering. PhD dissertation Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge/LA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang MS, Miller JD, Tai PYP (1983) Genetic and phenotypic path analyses and heritability in sugarcane. Crop Sci 23: 643–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmikantham M (1946) Pith in sugarcane. Curr Sci 15: 284–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre BL, Henderson MT (1972) The history and development of sugar yield calculations. Proc Am Soc Sugarcane Technol 2(ns):10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma G (1948) Studies in pithiness in sugarcane. Chronica Botanica, Waltham/MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. R. Hallauer

Approved for publication by the director of the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station as Manuscript No. 89-09-3203

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gravois, K.A., Milligan, S.B. & Martin, F.A. The role of pith, tube, and stalk density in determining sugarcane sucrose content and stalk weight. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 79, 273–277 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225963

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225963

Key words

Navigation