Skip to main content
Log in

A test of the producer-scrounger foraging game in captive flocks of spice finches, Loncbura punctulata

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group foraging allows the co-existence of a strategy (producer) that involves searching for food, and its alternative (scrounger) exploiting the food of the producer. The use of producer and scrounger strategies has been modelled as an alternative-option scramble which assumes strong negative frequency-dependence of the scrounger's pay-offs. We tested this assumption in a flock feeding situation by manipulating the proportion of scroungers in flocks of spice finches, Lonchura punctulata. In a first experiment we found that: (1) the food intake of scroungers, and to a lesser extent producers, was negatively affected by an increase in the proportion of scroungers; (2) the food intake of producers and scroungers was equal when the proportion of scroungers was small, suggesting that producers, who exploited 35.4% of their patches by scrounging were opportunistically adjusting their use of the strategies until the pay-offs equalized. In a second experiment we tested whether finches could vary their use of the two strategies in response to changes in foraging conditions brought about by an increase in the cost of producing. As predicted by the game, finches reduced their use of the producer strategy and increased their use of the scrounger strategy when the cost of producing increased. These results suggest that spice finches can alter their allocation to each foraging alternative by experience and that the producer-scrounger game is a realistic model for predicting group foraging decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard CJ (1984) The evolution of food-scrounging strategies within and between species. In: Barnard CJ (ed) Producers and scroungers: strategies of exploitation and parasitism. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 95–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard CJ, Sibly RM (1981) Producers and scroungers: a general model and its application to captive flocks of house sparrows. Anim Behav 29:543–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann JH, Barnard CJ (1979) Kleptoparasitism in birds. Anim Behav 27:487–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T, Giraldeau L-A (1991) Social foraging: Producing and scrounging in a stochastic environment. J Theor Biol 153:559–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R (1980) Good strategy or evolutionarily stable strategy? In: Barlow GW, Silverberg J (eds) Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture? AAA S Selected Symposium 35, Westview Press, Boulder, pp 331–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis N (1992) Do flocks of specialists forage more efficiently than flocks of generalists: a test of the skill pool hypothesis using flocks of spice finches Lonchura punctulata. Unpublished MSc thesis, Concordia University, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldeau L-A, Lefebvre L (1986) Exchangeable producer and scrounger roles in a captive flock of feral pigeons: a case for the skill pool effect. Anim Behav 34:797–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldeau L-A, Hogan JA, Clinchy MJ (1990) The payoffs to producing and scrounging: what happens when patches are divisible? Ethology 85:132–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin D (1982) Estrildid finches of the world. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hake M, Ekman J (1988) Finding and sharing depletable patches: when group foraging decreases intake rates. Ornis Scand 19:275–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harley C (1981) Learning the evolutionarily stable strategy. J Theor Biol 89:611–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Immelmann K (1982) Australian finches in bush and aviary, 3rd edn. Angus and Robertson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer C, Ruttan L (1988) The evolution of cooperative hunting. Am Nat 132:159–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1984a) Evolutionarily stable strategies. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 2nd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 30–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1984b) The producer/scrounger model and its relevance to sexuality. In: Barnard CJ (ed) Producers and scroungers: strategies of exploitation and parasitism. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 127–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ (1986) Functions of schoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) The behaviour of teleost fishes. Croom Helm, London, pp 294–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöysä H (1992) Group foraging in patchy environments: the importance of coarse-level local enhancement. Ornis Scand 23:159–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer S, Ewald PW (1981) The cost of dominance and advantage of subordination in a badge signalling system. Evolution 35:441–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Theimer TC (1987) The effect of seed dispersion on the foraging success of dominant and subordinate dark-eyed juncos, Junco hyemalis. Anim Behav 35:1883–1890

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe WH (1963) Learning and instinct in animals. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery WL, Giraldeau L-A, Templeton JJ, Kramer DL, Chapman CA (1991) Producers, scroungers and group foraging. Am Nat 137:847–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath F (1984) Kleptobiotic interactions in invertebrates. In: Barnard CJ (ed) Producers and scroungers: strategies of exploitation and parasitism. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 61–94

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: L.-A. Giraldeau

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giraldeau, LA., Soos, C. & Beauchamp, G. A test of the producer-scrounger foraging game in captive flocks of spice finches, Loncbura punctulata . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34, 251–256 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183475

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183475

Key words

Navigation