Skip to main content
Log in

Phase II trial of continuous drug infusions in advanced ovarian carcinoma: Acivicin versus vinblastine

  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Sixty-six women with advanced ovarian carcinoma of coelomic epithelial origin were randomly assigned to one of two intravenous single-agent infusion treatment regimens, either acivicin (60 mg/m2/course, administered as a 72-hr infusion) or vinblastine (7.5 mg/m2/course, administered as a 120-hr infusion) every three weeks. All had progressive disease after one to three prior chemotherapeutic regimens. Of 62 patients who were evaluable for response, survival and toxicity, there was one partial response (2%) produced by vin-blastine. Median survival was 13 weeks on either treatment arm. Three patients (10%) on the acivicin arm experienced life-threatening myelosuppression. Severe toxicities resulting from this treatment included myelosuppression (26%), neurotoxicity (16%), mucositis (3%) and vomiting (6%). Vinblastine was associated with one lethal pneumonia and five cases of life-threatening myelosuppression (16%); severe toxicities included myelosuppression (58%), genitourinary toxicity (6%), infection (3%), and edema (3%). Neither regimen produces useful clinical results in patients who have relapsed after prior chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klaassen DJ, Boyes DA, Gerulath A, Levitt M, Miller AB, Pearson JG: Preliminary report of a clinical trial of the treatment of patients with advanced stage III and IV ovarian cancer with melphalan, 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in combination and sequentially: A study of the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Cancer Treat Rep 63:289–295, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith JP, Rutledge F, Wharton JT: Chemotherapy of ovarian cancer: New approaches to treatment. Cancer 30:1565–1571, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brodovsky HS, Pocock SJ: A comparison of melphalan with fluorouracil, cytoxan and methotrexate in patients with ovarian cancer. (Abstr) Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 15:165, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  4. Young RC, Chabner BA, Hubbard SP, Fisher RI, Bender RA, Anderson T, Simon RM, Canellos GP, DeVita VT: Ad-vanced ovarian adenocarcinoma. A prospective clinical trial of melphalan (L-PAM) versus combination chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 299:1261–1266, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bruckner HW, Pagano M, Falkson G, Creech R, Arseneau JC, Horton J, Brodovsky H, Davis TE, Slayton RW, Green-span E: Controlled prospective trial of combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: A preliminary report. Cancer Treat Rep 63:297–299, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vogl SE, Berenzweig M, Kaplan BH, Moukhtar M, Bulkin W: The CHAD and HAD regimens in advanced ovarian cancer: Combination chemotherapy including cyclophosphamide, hexamethylmelamine, adriamaycin, and cis-di-chlorodiammineplatinum (II). Cancer Treat Rep 63:311–317, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrlich CE, Einhorn L, Williams SD, Morgan J: Chemotherapy for stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer with cisdichlorodiammineplatinum (II), adriamycin and cyclophosphamide: A preliminary report. Cancer Treat Rep 63:281–288, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kane R, Harvey H, Andrews T, Bernath A, Curry S, Dixon R, Gottlieb R, Kukrika M, Lipton A, Mortel R, Ricci J, White D: Phase II trial of cyclophosphamide, hexamethyl-melamine, adriamycin and cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II) combination chemotherapy in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rep 63:307–309, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hainsworth JD, Grosh WW, Burnett LS, Jones HW III, Wolff SN, Greco FA: Advanced ovarian cancer: long-term results of treatment with intensive cisplatin-based chemotherapy of brief duration. Ann Int Med 108:165–170, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thigpen T, Vanee R, Lambuth B, Balducci L, Khansur T, Blessing J, McGehee R: Chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gynecologic cancer. Cancer 60:2104–2116, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  11. Neil GL, Berger AE, Bhuyan BK, Blowers CL, Kuenzel SL: Studies of the biochemical pharmacology of the fermen-tation-derived antitumor agent, (αS,5S)-α-amino-3-chloro-4, 5-dihydro-5-isoxazoleacetic acid (AT-125). Adv Enzyme Regulation 17:375–398, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sridhar KS, Ohnuma T, Chahinian AP, Holland JF: Phase I study of acivicin in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 67:701–703, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weiss GR, McGovren JP, Schade D, Kufe DW: Phase I and pharmacological study of acivicin by 24-hour continuous infusion. Cancer Res 42:3892–3895, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  14. Earhart RH, Koeller JM, Davis TE, Borden EC, McGovren JP, Davis HL, Tormey DC: Phase I trial and pharmacokinetics of acivicin administered by 72-hour infusion. Cancer Treat Rep 67:683–692, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor S, Belt RJ, Joseph U, Haas CD, Hoogstraten B: Phase I evaluation of AT-125 single dose every three weeks. Invest New Drugs 2:311–314, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  16. Earhart RH, Neil GL: Acivicin in 1985. Adv. Enzyme Regulation 24:179–205, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bleehen N, Jelliffe A: Vinblastine sulfate in the treatment of malignant disease. Br J Cancer 19:268–273, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wright TL, Hurley J, Korst DR, Monto RW, Rohn RJ, Will JJ, Louis J: Vinblastine in neoplastic disease: Midwest Cooperative Chemotherapy Group. Cancer Res 22:169–179, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alberts DS, Salmon SE, Chen H-SG, Surwit EA, Soehnlen B, Young L: In vitro detection of cross-resistance (XR) and sensitivity (S) in relapsing ovarian cancer (OV) with the human tumor stem cell assay (HTSCA). (Abstr) Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 21:181, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alberts DS, Salmon SE, Chen HSG, Surwit EA, Soehnlen B, Young L, Moon TE: In vitro clonogenic assay for predicting response of ovarian cancer to chemotherapy. Lancet 2:340–342, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yap H-Y, Blumenschein GR, Keating MJ, Hortobagyi GN, Tashima CK, Loo TL: Vinblastine given as a continuous 5-day infusion in the treatment of refractory advanced breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 64:279–283, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kavanagh JJ, Wharton JT, Rutledge FN: Continuous-infusion vinblastine for treatment of refractory epithelial carcinoma of the ovary: A phase II trial. Cancer Treat Rep 68:1417–1418, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lu K, Yap H-Y, Loo TL: Clinical pharmacokinetics of vinblastine by continuous intravenous infusion. Cancer Res 43:1405–1408, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cox DR: Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J Royal Statistical Soc B34:187–220, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  25. McGuire WP, Blessing JA, DiSaia PJ, Buchsbaum HJ: Phase II trial of acivicin in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 4:49–52, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marsoni S, Hoth D, Simon R, Leyland-Jones B, De Rosa M, Wittes RE: Clinical drug development: An analysis of phase II trials, 1970–1985. Cancer Treat Rep 71:71–80, 1987

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (Paul P. Carbone, chairman).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Earhart, R.H., Khandekar, J.D., Faraggi, D. et al. Phase II trial of continuous drug infusions in advanced ovarian carcinoma: Acivicin versus vinblastine. Invest New Drugs 7, 255–260 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170870

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170870

Key words

Navigation