Skip to main content
Log in

A methodology for parameter estimation in seaweed productivity modelling

  • 3. Ecology
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a combined approach for parameter estimation in models of primary production. The focus is on gross primary production and nutrient assimilation by seaweeds.

A database of productivity determinations, biomass and mortality measurements and nutrient uptake rates obtained over one year for Gelidium sesquipedale in the Atlantic Ocean off Portugal has been used. Annual productivity was estimated by harvesting methods, and empirical relationships using mortality/wave energy and respiration rates have been derived to correct for losses and to convert the estimates to gross production.

In situ determinations of productivity have been combined with data on the light climate (radiation periods, intensity, mean turbidity) to give daily and annual productivity estimates. The theoretical nutrient uptake calculated using a ‘Redfield ratio’ approach and determinations of in situ N and P consumption by the algae during incubation periods have also been compared.

The results of the biomass difference and incubation approaches are discussed in order to assess the utility of coefficients determined in situ for parameter estimation in seaweed production models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, K. E. & S. N. Murray, 1980. Relationships between irradiance and photosynthesis for marine benthic green algae (Chlorophyta) of differing morphologies. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 43: 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhuis, B. H., 1977. Comparisons of salt-marsh fucoid production estimated from three different indices. J. Phycol. 13: 328–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Búesa, R. J., 1977. Photosynthesis and respiration of some tropical marine plants. Aquat. Bot. 3: 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dromgoole, F. I., 1978. The effects of pH and inorganic carbon on photosynthesis and dark respiration of Carpophyllum (Fucales Phaeophyceae). Aquat. Bot. 4: 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dromgoole, F. I., 1978. The effects of oxygen on dark respiration and apparent photosynthesis of marine macro-algae. Aquat. Bot. 4: 281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, J. G. & L. Ramos, 1989. A model for the estimation of annual production rates of macrophyte algae. Aquat. Bot. 33: 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksen, S. & J. Rueness, 1989. Culture studies of Gelidium latifolium (Grev.) Born et Thur. (Rhodophyta) from Norway. Growth and nitrogen storage in response to varying photon flux density, temperature and nitrogen availability. Bot. mar. 32: 539–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, R. M., P. A. Wheeler & R. L. Edwards, 1989. Assessment of macroalgal nitrogen limitation in a seasonal upwelling region. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 53: 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khailov, K. M. & Z. P. Burlakova, 1969. Release of dissolved organic matter by marine seaweeds and distribution of total organic production to unshore communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 14: 521–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, M. M. & K. E. Arnold, 1980. Sources of variability in macroalgal primary productivity: sampling and interpretative problems. Aquat. Bot. 8: 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macler, B. A. & J. R. Zupan, 1991. Physiological basis for the cultivation of the Gelidiaceae. Hydrobiologia 221: 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, K. H., 1973. Seaweeds: Their productivity and strategy for growth. Science, 182: 975–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef, R., 1977. Ecologia. Omega, Barcelona, 962 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo, R. A., B. W. W. Harger & M. Neushul, 1991. Gelidium cultivation in the sea. Hydrobiologia 221: 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, M. S., T. Ramakrisnha, G. V. Sarat Babu & Y. N. Rao, 1986. Estimation of net primary productivity of intertidal seaweeds — limitations and latent problems. Aquat. Bot. 23: 383–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. R., M. Takahashi & B. Hargrave, 1984. Biological Oceanographic Processes. 3rd edn. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 330 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires, H. O. & A. Rodrigues, 1988. Modelo de agitaçao marítima

  • Rable, A., 1985. Active solar collectors and their applications. Oxford Univ. Press., 200 pp.

  • Santos, R. & P. Duarte, 1991. Marine plant harvest in Portugal. J. appl. Phycol. 3: 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, M., F. X. Niell & P. Algarra, 1991. Photosynthesis of Gelidium sesquipedale: effects of temperature and light on pigment concentration, C/N ratio and cell-wall polysaccharides. Hydrobiologia 221: 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollenweider, R. A., 1974. A manual on methods for measuring primary production in aquatic environments. Published for the International Biological Program by Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 225 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegert, R. G. & F. C. Evans, 1964. Primary production and disappearance of dead vegetation on an old field in south-eastern Michigan. Ecology 45: 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duarte, P., Ferreira, J.G. A methodology for parameter estimation in seaweed productivity modelling. Hydrobiologia 260, 183–189 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049018

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049018

Key words

Navigation