Abstract
Forest regeneration can be improved by matching seedling stock with reforestation site environmental conditions. To achieve this improvement, one must characterize seedling performance potential with anticipated field site conditions. A theoretical performance potential index (PPI) has been developed to forecast seedling field performance during the first growing season on a reforestation site. PPI includes material and performance attribute tests that characterize seedling performance potential under optimum and limiting environmental conditions. Test results are standardized and then integrated resulting in a comprehensive assessment procedure. The PPI concept is demonstrated using containerized western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.) seedlings subjected to a series of dormancy induction treatments and the results are compared with actual seedling performance during the first growing season on a reforestation site. Results indicated that PPI values for western hemlock seedlings treated with various dormancy induction treatments corresponded to field performance. Possible use of PPI in stock selection is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous. 1980. Techniques for evaluating Planting Stock Quality. N. Z. J. Forestry Sci. 10 (Special issue), 303 pp.
Armson, K. A. and Sadreka, V. 1979. Forest tree nursery soil management and related practices. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 177 pp.
Burdett, A. N. 1983. Quality control in the production of forest planting stock. For. Chron. 59: 132–138.
Burdett, A. N. 1987. Understanding root growth capacity: theoretical considerations in assessing planting stock quality by means of root growth tests. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 768–775.
Burdett, A. N. 1990. Physiological processes in plantation establishment and the development of specifications for forest planting stock. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 415–427.
Burdett, A. N., Simpson, D. G. and Thompson, C. F. 1983. Root development and plantation establishment success. Plant Soil. 71: 103–110.
Chavasse, C. G. R. 1980. Planting stock quality: a review of factors affecting performance. N.Z.J. For. 25: 144–171.
Cleary, B. D., Greaves, R. D. and Owston, P. W. 1978. Seedlings. In: Cleary, B. D., Greaves R. D. and Hermann, R. K. (Eds) Regenerating Oregon Forests, pp. 63–98. Oregon State Univ. Extension Service, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Colombo, S. J. 1986. Second-year shoot development in black spruce Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P. container seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 68–73.
Duryea, M. L. (Ed) 1985a. Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests. For. Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR, 143 pp.
Duryea, M. L. 1985b. Evaluating seedling quality; importance to reforestation In: Duryea, M.L. (Ed) Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests, pp. 1–16. Forest Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ. Corvallis, OR.
Gardner, R. H., Cale, W. G. and O'Neill, R. V. 1982. Robust analysis of aggregation error. Ecology 63: 1771–1779.
Glerum, C. 1985. Frost hardiness of coniferous seedlings: principles and applications. In: Duryea, M. L. (Ed) Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests, pp. 107–123. Forest Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.
Glerum, C. 1988. Evaluation of planting stock quality. In: Smith, C. R. and Reffle, R. J. (Eds) Taking Stock: The role of nursery practice in forest Renewal, pp. 44–49. Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, OFRC Symposium Proc. O-P-16.
Grossnickle, S. C. and Arnott, J. T. 1991. Gas exchange response of western hemlock seedlings from various dormancy induction treatments to reforestation site environmental conditions. For. Ecol. Manage. (in press).
Grossnickle, S. C., Arnott, J. T. and Major, J. E. 1988. A stock quality assessment procedure for characterizing nursery-grown seedlings, pp. 77–88. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-167
Grossnickle, S. C., Arnott, J. T., Major, J. E. and Tschaplinski, T. J. 1991a. Influence of dormancy induction treatments on western hemlock seedlings. 1. Seedling development and stock quality assessment. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 164–174.
Grossnickle, S. C., Arnott, J. T. and Major, J. E. 1991b. Influence of dormancy induction treatments on western hemlock seedlings. 2. Physiological and morphological response during the first growing season on a reforestation site. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 175–185.
Hinckley, T. M., Lassoie, J. P. and Running, S. W. 1978. Temporal and spatial variations in the water status of forest trees. For. Sci. Monog. No. 20.
Jaramillo, A. 1980. Review of techniques used to evaluate seedling quality. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-109, pp. 84–95.
Jones, M. M. and Turner, N. C. 1978. Osmotic adjustments to leaves of sorghum in response to water deficits. Plant Physiol. 61: 122–126.
Marshall, J. D. 1985. Carbohydrate status as a measure of seedling quality. In: Duryea, M. L. (Ed) Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests, pp. 49–58. Forest Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.
Puttonen, P. 1989. Criteria for using seedling performance potential tests. New For. 3: 67–87.
Ritchie, G.A. 1984. Assessing seedling quality. In: Duryea, M. L. and Landis, T. D. (Eds) Forest Nursery Manual: Production of Bareroot Seedlings, pp. 243–259. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.
Schmidt-Vogt, H. 1981. Morphological and physiological characteristics of planting stock: present state of research and research tasks for the future. In: Proc., IUFRO XVII World Congress. Kyoto, Japan, pp. 433–446.
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics, 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, 633 pp.
Sutton, R. F. 1979. Planting stock quality and grading. For. Ecol. and Manage. 2: 123–132.
Sutton, R. F. 1982. Plantation establishment with bareroot stock; some critical factors. In: Mroz G. D. and Berner, J. F. (Eds) Artificial Regeneration of Conifers in the Upper Great Lakes Region. Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, Michigan, USA.
Sutton, R. F. 1988. Planting stock quality is fitness for purpose. In: Smith, C. R. and Reffle, R. J. (Eds) Taking stock: The role of nursery practice in forest Renewal, pp. 39–43. Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Can. For. Serv., OFRC Symposium Proc. O-P-16.
Thompson, B. E. 1985. Seedling morphological evaluation—What you can tell by looking. In: Duryea, M. L. (Ed) Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests, pp. 59–72. Forest Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.
Timmis, R. 1980. Stress resistance and quality criteria for tree seedlings: analysis, measurement and use. N.Z.J. For. Sci. 10: 21–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grossnickle, S.C., Major, J.E., Arnott, J.T. et al. Stock quality assessment through an integrated approach. New Forest 5, 77–91 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029300
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029300