Skip to main content
Log in

Skeleton weight allometry in aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relation of skeleton weight to body weight with increasing size is compared for aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates. Due to the buoyancy of water, the skeleton weights of aquatic vertebrates (fishes and whales) vary in nearly direct proportion (exponent 1.0) to body weight; while the skeletons of terrestrial vertebrates occupy an increasingly greater proportion of total body weight as size increases (exponent greater than i. i) due to the necessity of supporting their weight on land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakker, R. T. 1975. Dinosaur renaissance. Sci. Amer. 232: 58–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currey, J. D. 1967. The failure of exoskeletons and endoskeletons. J. Morph. 123: 1–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. D. 1962. Allometric relationships in lions vs. domestic cats. Evolution 16: 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, H. H. 1919. Quantitative studies on the growth of the skeleton in the albino rat. Amer. J. Anat. 26: 237–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galileo, G. L. 1638. Dialogues concerning two new sciences, Transl. by H. Crew and A. De Salvio (1933), Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. 1971. Geometric similarity in allometric growth: a contribution to the problem of scaling in the evolution of size. Amer. Nat. 105: 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. V. 1950. The dimensions of animals and their muscular dynamics. Sci. Progr. 38: 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayser, C. & Heusner, A. 1964. Etude comparative du métabolisme énergétique dans la série animale. J. Physiol. 56: 489–524.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer, C. 1976. Body weights of some species of large whales. J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer 36: 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, T. 1973. Size and shape in biology. Science 179: 1201–1204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niimi, A. J. 1974. Relationship between ash content and body weight in lamprey (Petromyzon marinus), trout (Salmo gairdneri) and bass (Micropterus salmoides). Copeia 1974: 794–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prange, H. D. & Christman, S. P. 1976. The allometrics of rattlesnake skeletons. Copeia 1976: 542–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, W. W. & Karlotski, W. J. 1977. The allometric relationship of skeleton weight to body weight in teleost fishes: a preliminary comparison with birds and mammals. Copeia 1977: 160–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, A. S. 1967. The Vertebrate Story. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Nielsen, K. 1972. How Animals Work. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, A. H. 1962. The relative weights of the skeletal parts in adult primates. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., n.s., 20: 1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szarski, H. 1964. The structure of respiratory organs in relation to body size in Amphibia. Evolution 18: 118–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. W. 1942. On Growth and Form. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ultsch, G. R. 1974. The allometric relationship between metabolic rate and body size: role of the skeleton. Amer. Midl. Nat. 92: 500–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reynolds, W.W. Skeleton weight allometry in aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates. Hydrobiologia 56, 35–37 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023283

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023283

Keywords

Navigation