Abstract
Background: Exploration of the contralateral breast in case of breast cancer has been advocated by many investigators, based on the incidence of contralateral cancer expected to be around 10–15%.
Method: From 1978 to 1993, 813 contralateral mammaplasties were performed to obtain symmetry in the course of breast reconstruction, including 373 mastopexies and 440 reduction mammaplasties (RMs). All these operations were performed in patients treated for a cancer of the opposite breast. Clinical and radiologic examination before the reduction mammaplasty showed tissue to be free of evident tumor.
Results: Twenty clinically and radiologically occult contralateral cancers were found in the reduction specimen (4.6%). Most of them were located in the lower and central quadrants (70%). The macroscopic size of the tumors varied from 3 to 16 mm. Twelve carcinomas were in situ, and eight cases were infiltrating.
Conclusion: The symmetry procedure allows a good check-up of the glandular tissue of the contralateral breast at the time of the breast reconstruction, especially when there is no evidence of tumor. The different techniques of breast reduction provide specific possibilities for such exploration and should be chosen according to the preferential area that should be explored.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fontaine F, Contesso G, Mouriesse H, Travagli JP, Sarrazin D. Bilateralisation des cancers du sein.Bull Cancer (Paris) 1985;72:127–38.
Pack GT. Argument for bilateral mastectomy.Surgery 1951;29:929.
Bloodgood JC. The remaining breast after radical removal of the opposite side for cancer.J South Surg Assoc 1921;34:223.
Hubbard TB Jr. Nonsimultaneous bilateral carcinoma of the breast.Surgery 1953;34:2460–8.
Farrow JH. Bilateral mammary cancer.Cancer 1956;9:1182.
Urban JA, Papachristou D, Taylor J. Bilateral breast cancer.Cancer 1977;40:1968–73.
Petit JY, Rietjens M, Garusi C, Capko D. Primary and secondary breast reconstruction with special emphasis on the use of prosthesis.Recent Results Cancer Res 1996;140.
Pitanguy I. Reduction mammaplasty. In:Aesthetic Plastic Surgery of Head and Body. Vol. 1. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981:3–36.
McKissock PK. Reduction mammaplasty by the vertical bipedicle flap technique.Clin Plast Surg 1976;3:309.
Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM. Reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique: an alternative to free nipple and areola grafting for severe macromastia or extreme ptosis.Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;66:646.
Contesso G, Mouriesse H, Genin J, Sarrazin D, Friedman S, Rouesse J. The importance of histologic grade in long term prognosis of breast cancer: a study of 1010 patients uniformly treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy.J Clin Oncol 1987;5:1378–86.
Wanebo HJ, Senofsky GM, Fechner RE, Kaiser D, Lynn S, Paradies J. Bilateral breast cancer. Risk reduction by contralateral biopsy.Ann Surg 1985;201:667–77.
Smith BL, Bertagnolli M, Klein BB, et al. Evaluation of the contralateral breast. The role of biopsy at the time of treatment of primary breast cancer.Ann Surg 1992;216:17–21.
Spratt JS, Donegan WL.Cancer of the Breast. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1971:133–134.
Mascaret L, Trojani M, Coindre JM, Faucher A. The incidence of cancer in the contralateral reduction mammaplasty after mastectomy and reconstruction of the removed breast.Tumori 1986;72:183–6.
Baasch M, Nielsen SF, Engholm G, Lund K. Breast cancer incidence subsequent to surgical reduction of the female breast.Br J Cancer 1996;73:961–3.
Bondeson L, Linell F, Ringberg A. Breast reductions: what to do with all the tissue specimens?Histopathology 1985;9:281–5.
Dinner MI, Artz JS. Carcinoma of the breast occuring in routine reduction mammaplasty.Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:1042–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petit, JY., Rietjens, M., Contesso, G. et al. Contralateral mastoplasty for breast reconstruction: A good opportunity for glandular exploration and occult carcinomas diagnosis. Annals of Surgical Oncology 4, 511–515 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303678
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303678