Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Putting the poorest farmers in control of disseminating improved wheat seed: a strategy to accelerate technology adoption and alleviate poverty in Bangladesh

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on a ‘bottom-up’ system of wheat seed technology transfer that was piloted in north–west Bangladesh with 45 mainly marginal (food insecure) farming families during the 2004–2005 wheat season, then scaled out to a further 545 mainly marginal, farming families during the 2006–2007 season. The system was devised following a survey which indicated that such farmers can obtain a 52% increase in wheat grain yield and extra income by switching from the old Kanchan variety to the newer, heat and disease-tolerant Shatabdi variety. The bottom-up wheat seed dissemination system involved the creation of an enabling environment which allowed poor and ultra-poor farmers to store and sell selected seed of recently-released wheat varieties that they produced in 20 decimal (0.08 ha) plots. During the pilot phase of the project in 2005, farmers produced 7, 976 kg of grain and more than 50% of this was selected as high quality seed, stored during the monsoon season and marketed to other farmers just prior to the following wheat season. This seed was sold at Tk25–30/kg and realised profits averaging Tk3,002 (€38.49; exchange rate was 78:1 in October 2005) per household. In 2007, the seed price had risen to Tk33–50/kg and a larger group of farmers produced, stored and marketed 168,800 kg of high quality wheat seed, which realised profits averaging Tk5,080, equivalent to €51 (exchange rate was 99.6:1 in October 2007), per household. This bottom up seed production and dissemination system met the wheat seed requirements of more than 1,400 neighbouring farmers in areas with a deficit of wheat seed for planting, and enabled poor and ultra-poor farmers to earn more than 50% of the income they needed to cross the local poverty line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. CM 98472 pedigree (Maringa/Buckbuck//Bolillo/Pavon/3/Punjab81).

  2. Part of the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI).

  3. Bangladesh’s poverty line varies according to the ‘cost of basic needs’ such as food and other essential items (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics and World Bank Poverty Assessment, 2002). Tk9,176 was calculated as being the ‘cost of basic needs’ in October 2007 by Dipak Kumar Ghosh of PROSHIKA.

  4. According to FAO/WHO/UN human daily energy requirements vary as follows: 2,780kcal for a male subsistence farmer; 2,235kcal for a rural woman in a developing country (2,585–2,977kcal during pregnancy and lactation); 1,140kcal for girls aged 1–10years; 1,200–2,150kcal for boys aged 1–10years; 2,300–2,340kcal for adolescent girls aged 10–18years and 2,500–3,100kcal for adolescent boys aged 10–18years (FAO 1985).

  5. Unprocessed rice contains 360kcal/100g (Saunders and Betschart 1979).

  6. Funded by DfID UK: see Page et al. 2006.

  7. The national seed supplier, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation (BADC) is only able to provide 15–20% of the country’s wheat seed requirements.

  8. In 1997 the government signed the national seed act which allows farmers to sell so-called ‘truthfully labelled’ seed as long as they take legal responsibility for its quality (Danielsen et al. 2005). As a result hundreds of farming families have been linked with suppliers of foundation seed and trained to produce good quality rice seed in several areas of Bangladesh by the Grameen Krishi Foundation (Van Mele et al. 2005) and the Rangpur Dinajpur Rural Service (RDRS) (Samsuzzaman and Van Mele 2005). In some cases, these farmers have organised themselves into seed-selling groups to maximise profits. Similar practices are possible with wheat seed production and marketing by small farmers in Bangladesh. The project we describe here was developed to help very poor farmers take advantage of the opportunities provided by this innovative policy.

  9. Funded by DFID UK, see Page et al.( 2006).

  10. This involves training families as wheat-producing units in recognition of the fact that all immediate family members participate in the production cycle and are affected by production decisions and results. Husband and wife, or mother and eldest son most commonly attend. Modesty is preserved by encouraging husbands and wives to sit together and adjacent to a member of the same sex. This arrangement also promotes the sharing of child care during training sessions, see Fig. 1. Women are also encouraged to participate in any field work. The methodologies were specifically designed by the WRC to be participatory, gender unbiased, and comprehensible for all educational levels. Formal classroom settings and teaching styles are discouraged. Instead, training rooms are arranged with semicircular seating to encourage maximum interaction and informal training methodologies are advocated. Evaluations have recorded 100 per cent comprehension of key messages, and nearly all wheat recommendations had a tested adoption rate of 90% to 100% (Meisner et al. 2003).

  11. Funded by Swiss Agency for Development and Co-operation.

  12. First United Nations Millennium Development Goal.

References

  • Badaruddin M, Saunders DA, Siddique AB, Hossain MA, Ahmed MU, Rahman MM, Parveen S (1994) Determining yield constraints for wheat production in Bangladesh. In: Saunders DA, Hettel GP (eds.) Proc. of the Wheat in heat-stressed environments: irrigated, dry areas and rice–wheat systems conferences held in 1993 at Wad Medani (Sudan) and Dinajpur (Bangladesh), Mexico DF, pp 265–271

  • Baksh ME (2004) Economic efficiency and sustainability of wheat production in wheat-based cropping Systems in North–West Bangladesh. Ph.D. Thesis, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh. Unpublished

  • Baksh ME, M. Harun ur Rashid and M. Golam Rabbani (2006) Report on Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) at PVS Village in Thakurgaon, Dinajpur, Rajshahi and in Jamalpur districts. Wheat Research Centre, Dinajpur. Unpublished

  • Barma NCD, Malaker PK, Baksh ME, Hossain I, Samad MA, Saifuzzaman M, Sufian MA, Hossain ABS (2008) Wheat production in Bangladesh—an overview. In: Reynolds MP, Pietragalla J, Braun H-J (eds) International Symposium on Wheat Yield Potential: Challenges to International Wheat Breeding. CIMMYT, Mexico DF, pp 30–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatrath R, Mishra B, Ortiz-Ferrara G, Singh SK, Joshi AK (2007) Challenges to wheat production in South Asia. Euphytica 157:447–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy C, Sutherland A (2004) Participatory technology development with resource-poor farmers: maximising impact through the use of recommendation domains. AgREN Network Paper No. 133, 10 pp

  • Craufurd P, Dorward P, Marfo K, Bam R, Dogbe W (2004) Participatory varietal selection (PVS) to identify upland rice cvs in Ghana. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress Brisbane, Australia, 26 Sep–1 Oct 2004. Available at http://www.cropscience.org.au

  • Danielsen S, Bashar MK, Holderness M (2005) Innovations in seed systems. In: Van Mele P, Salhuddin A, Magor N (eds) Innovations in rural extension. Case studies from Bangladesh. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp 185–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for International Development (1999) Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. Available at http://www.livelihoods.org/info/info_guidancesheets.html. Accessed 4 June 2008

  • FAO (1985) Report of the joint FAO/WHO/UN expert consultation. Geneva WHO. Technical Report Series No. 724. Available at http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/AA040E/AA040E00.htm. Accessed 25 June 2008

  • Jiggins J (1986) Women and the green revolution. Gender-related impacts and the work of the International Agricultural Research Centres. World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Witcombe JR (1996) Farmer participatory crop improvement. II. Participatory varietal selection: a case study in India. Exp Agric 32:461–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton M, Longhurst R (1989) New seeds and poor people. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA, p 473

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisner CA, Sufian A, Baksh E, Smith O’Donoghue M, Razzaque MA, Shaha NK (2003) Whole family training and adoption of innovations in wheat producing households in Bangladesh. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 9(4):165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page SLJ, Chonyera P (1994) The promotion of maize fertiliser packages: a cause of household food insecurity and peasant impoverishment in high rainfall areas of Zimbabwe. Dev South Afr 11(3):301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page SLJ, Baksh E, Rahman M, Rozina YL, Jahangir K, Harun-ur-Rashid J, Kispatta K (2006) Reaping the benefits: assessing the impact and facilitating the uptake of resource conserving technologies in the rice–wheat systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Bangladesh’s final report to the Department for International Development. Available at http://www.research4development.info/SearchResearchDatabase.asp?ProjectID=3706

  • Pandit DB, Baksh ME, Sufian MA, Harun-Ur-Rashid M, Islam MM (2007) Impacts of participatory variety selection in wheat on agro-economic changes of wheat farmers in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Agric Res 32(3):335–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MH, Manprasert S (2006) Landlessness and its impact on economic development: a case study on Bangladesh. Journal of Social Sciences 2(2):54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice–Wheat Consortium (2006) A research strategy for improved livelihoods and sustainable rice–wheat cropping in the Indo-Gangetic Plains: vision for 2006–2010 and beyond. Available at http://www.rwc.cgiar.org/Pub_Info.asp?ID=178. Accessed January 2007

  • Samsuzzaman S, Van Mele P (2005) Innovating with federations: community institutions take the lead in seed marketing. In: Van Mele P, Salhuddin A, Magor N (eds) Innovations in rural extension. Case studies from Bangladesh. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp 233–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders R, Betschart A (1979) Rice and rice foods. In: Inglett GE, Charalambous G (eds) Tropical foods: chemistry and nutrition. Academic, New York, USA, pp 191–216

  • Sharma RC, Duveiller E, Ortiz-Ferrara G (2007) Progress and challenge towards reducing wheat spot blotch threat in the Eastern Gangetic Plains of South Asia: is climate change already taking its toll? Field Crops Res 103:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddique AB, Hossain MH, Duveiller E, Sharma RC (2006) On-farm and on-station trials under warm growing conditions confirm progress in breeding for spot blotch resistant wheat in Bangladesh. Journal of Phytopathology 154:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sufian MA (2005) Sustainable wheat production in Bangladesh in relation to climate change. A keynote paper presented at the workshop on ‘Sustainable Wheat Production’ held at BRAC Centre Inn, Dhaka, October

  • Van Mele P, Salhuddin A, Jabbar MA (2005) Grameen seed: Grameen experiments with a pro-poor seed business. In: Van Mele P, Salhuddin A, Magor N (eds) Innovations in rural extension. Case studies from Bangladesh. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp 233–244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam L. J. Page.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Page, S.L.J., Baksh, M.E., Duveiller, E. et al. Putting the poorest farmers in control of disseminating improved wheat seed: a strategy to accelerate technology adoption and alleviate poverty in Bangladesh. Food Sec. 1, 99–109 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-008-0006-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-008-0006-7

Keywords

Navigation