Skip to main content
Log in

D-brane anomaly inflow revisited

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Axial and gravitational anomaly of field theories, when embedded in string the- ory, must be accompanied by canceling inflow. We give a self-contained overview for various world-volume theories, and clarify the role of smeared magnetic sources in I-brane/D-brane cases. The proper anomaly descent of the source, as demanded by regularity of RR field strengths H’s, turns out to be an essential ingredient. We show how this allows correct inflow to be generated for all such theories, including self-dual cases, and also that the mechanism is now insensitive to the choice between the two related but inequivalent forms of D-brane Chern-Simons couplings. In particular, SO(6) R axial anomaly of d = 4 max- imal SYM is canceled by the inflow onto D3-branes via the standard minimal coupling to C 4. We also propose how, for the anomaly cancelation, the four types of Orientifold planes should be coupled to the spacetime curvatures, of which conflicting claims existed previously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Duff, J.T. Liu and R. Minasian, Eleven-dimensional origin of string-string duality: A One loop test, Nucl. Phys. B 452 (1995) 261 [hep-th/9506126] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Witten, Five-brane effective action in M-theory, J. Geom. Phys. 22 (1997) 103 [hep-th/9610234] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Freed, J.A. Harvey, R. Minasian and G.W. Moore, Gravitational anomaly cancellation for M-theory five-branes, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 601 [hep-th/9803205] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Y.-K.E. Cheung and Z. Yin, Anomalies, branes and currents, Nucl. Phys. B 517 (1998) 69 [hep-th/9710206] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. M.B. Green, J.A. Harvey and G.W. Moore, I-brane inflow and anomalous couplings on D-branes, Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997) 47 [hep-th/9605033] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Alvarez-Gaumé and E. Witten, Gravitational Anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 234 (1984) 269 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J.F. Morales, C.A. Scrucca and M. Serone, Anomalous couplings for D-branes and O-planes, Nucl. Phys. B 552 (1999) 291 [hep-th/9812071] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Stefański Jr., Gravitational couplings of D-branes and O-planes, Nucl. Phys. B 548 (1999) 275 [hep-th/9812088] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Dasgupta, D.P. Jatkar and S. Mukhi, Gravitational couplings and Z(2) orientifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 523 (1998) 465 [hep-th/9707224] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Dasgupta and S. Mukhi, Anomaly inflow on orientifold planes, JHEP 03 (1998) 004 [hep-th/9709219] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Distler, D.S. Freed and G.W. Moore, Orientifold Precis, arXiv:0906.0795 [INSPIRE].

  12. C.A. Scrucca and M. Serone, Anomaly inflow and RR anomalous couplings, hep-th/9911223 [INSPIRE].

  13. S. Mukhi and N.V. Suryanarayana, Gravitational couplings, orientifolds and M planes, JHEP 09 (1999) 017 [hep-th/9907215] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Henry-Labordere and B. Julia, Gravitational couplings of orientifold planes, JHEP 01 (2002) 033 [hep-th/0112065] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J.F. Ospina Giraldo, Gravitational couplings for generalized orientifold planes, hep-th/0006076 [INSPIRE].

  16. S.B. Treiman et al., Current Algebra and Anomalies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, U.S.A. (1985).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Witten, Global Aspects of Current Algebra, Nucl. Phys. B 223 (1983) 422 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Bott and L.W. Tu, Differential form in algebraic topology, Springer-Verlag, New York (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Deser, A. Gomberoff, M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Duality, selfduality, sources and charge quantization in Abelian N form theories, Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 80 [hep-th/9702184] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. K. Becker and M. Becker, Five-brane gravitational anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 577 (2000) 156 [hep-th/9911138] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Boyarsky, J.A. Harvey and O. Ruchayskiy, A Toy model of the M5-brane: Anomalies of monopole strings in five dimensions, Annals Phys. 301 (2002) 1 [hep-th/0203154] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. J.A. Harvey and O. Ruchayskiy, The Local structure of anomaly inflow, JHEP 06 (2001) 044 [hep-th/0007037] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, The Holographic Weyl anomaly, JHEP 07 (1998) 023 [hep-th/9806087] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. J.A. Harvey, R. Minasian and G.W. Moore, NonAbelian tensor multiplet anomalies, JHEP 09 (1998) 004 [hep-th/9808060] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. K.A. Intriligator, Anomaly matching and a Hopf-Wess-Zumino term in 6d, N=(2,0) field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 581 (2000) 257 [hep-th/0001205] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Yi, Anomaly of (2,0) theories, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 106006 [hep-th/0106165] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Henningson, Self-dual strings in six dimensions: Anomalies, the ADE-classification and the world-sheet WZW-model, Commun. Math. Phys. 257 (2005) 291 [hep-th/0405056] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. D.S. Berman and J.A. Harvey, The Self-dual string and anomalies in the M5-brane, JHEP 11 (2004) 015 [hep-th/0408198] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Henningson and E.P. Johansson, Dyonic anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 627 (2005) 203 [hep-th/0508103] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. C.A. Scrucca and M. Serone, Anomalies and inflow on D-branes and O - planes, Nucl. Phys. B 556 (1999) 197 [hep-th/9903145] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen and H. Georgi, Anomalies on orbifolds, Phys. Lett. B 516 (2001) 395 [hep-th/0103135] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. K. Becker, M. Becker and J. Schwarz, String theory and M-theory: A modern introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2007).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. M.B. Green and J.H. Schwarz, Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D = 10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory, Phys. Lett. B 149 (1984) 117 [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. J.H. Schwarz and A. Sen, Duality symmetric actions, Nucl. Phys. B 411 (1994) 35 [hep-th/9304154] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piljin Yi.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1201.0762

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, H., Yi, P. D-brane anomaly inflow revisited. J. High Energ. Phys. 2012, 12 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2012)012

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2012)012

Keywords

Navigation