Skip to main content
Log in

Winding number in string field theory

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motivated by the similarity between cubic string field theory (CSFT) and the Chern-Simons theory in three dimensions, we study the possibility of interpreting \( \mathcal{N} = \left( {{\pi^2}/3} \right)\int {{{\left( {U{\mathcal{Q}_B}{U^{{ - 1}}}} \right)}^3}} \) as a kind of winding number in CSFT taking quantized values. In particular, we focus on the expression of \( \mathcal{N} \) as the integration of a BRST-exact quantity, \( \mathcal{N} = \int {{\mathcal{Q}_B}\mathcal{A}} \) which vanishes identically in naive treatments. For realizing non-trivial \( \mathcal{N} \), we need a regularization for divergences from the zero eigenvalue of the operator K in the KB c algebra. This regularization must at the same time violate the BRST-exactness of the integrand of \( \mathcal{N} \). By adopting the regularization of shifting K by a positive infinitesimal, we obtain the desired value \( \mathcal{N}[{({{\text{U}}_{\text{tv}}})^{{\pm {1}}}}] = \mp {1} \) for U tv corresponding to the tachyon vacuum. However, we find that \( \mathcal{N}[{({{\text{U}}_{\text{tv}}})^{{\pm {2}}}}] \) differs from ∓2, the value expected from the additive law of \( \mathcal{N} \). This result may be understood from the fact that \( \Psi = U{\mathcal{Q}_B}{U^{{ - 1}}} \) with U = (U tv)±2 does not satisfy the CSFT EOM in the strong sense and hence is not truly a pure-gauge in our regularization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Witten, Noncommutative geometry and string field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 253 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Takahashi and S. Tanimoto, Marginal and scalar solutions in cubic open string field theory, JHEP 03 (2002) 033 [hep-th/0202133] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Schnabl, Analytic solution for tachyon condensation in open string field theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 10 (2006) 433 [hep-th/0511286] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Okawa, Comments on Schnabl’s analytic solution for tachyon condensation in Witten’s open string field theory, JHEP 04 (2006) 055 [hep-th/0603159] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Erler and M. Schnabl, A simple analytic solution for tachyon condensation, JHEP 10 (2009) 066 [arXiv:0906.0979] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Murata and M. Schnabl, On multibrane solutions in open string field theory, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 188 (2011) 50 [arXiv:1103.1382] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Erler and C. Maccaferri, Comments on Lumps from RG flows, JHEP 11 (2011) 092 [arXiv:1105.6057] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Murata and M. Schnabl, On multiple D-brane solutions in open string field theory, talk given at String Field Theory 2011, Prague Czech Republic, 20-24 September 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiko Kojita.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1111.2389

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hata, H., Kojita, T. Winding number in string field theory. J. High Energ. Phys. 2012, 88 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2012)088

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2012)088

Keywords

Navigation