Skip to main content

Knowledge in music theory by shapes of musical objects and sound-producing actions

  • I. Gestalt Theory Revisited
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Music, Gestalt, and Computing (JIC 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1317))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Music theory must try to deal with emergent qualities, such as contour, texture, timbre and tone semantics, and this necessitates recognizing musical objects as holistic entities. Representations by shapes can be useful here, as shapes are inherently holistic. The idea of shapes is seen as applicable to several aspects and modalities at work in musical imagery, providing images at various levels of resolution of both the unfolding sounds and the sound-producing actions. The paradigm of shapes is seen as well supported by several contemporary domains of thought, but in need of extensive development as an alternative to more abstract approaches in music theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bregman, A. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chion, M. (1983). Guide des objets sonores. Paris: Editions Buchet/Chastel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogan, R. (1984). New images of musical sound. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Man, P. (1978). The epistemology of metaphor. Critical Inquiry, 5, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M. (1989). Image et cognition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. (1984). Musical space. In W. Crozier & A. Chapman (Eds.), Cognitive processes in the perception of art. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A. (1989). Principles of mental imagery. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godøy, R., (1993). Formalization and epistemology. Oslo: Det historisk-filosofiske fakultet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberlandt, K. (1994). Cognitive psychology. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (Ed.). (1987). Categorical perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1980). Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins. Tübingen: Max Nimeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1963). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leman, M. (1995). Music and schema theory: Cognitive foundations of systematic musicology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, S. (1984). The auditory image: A metaphor for musical and psychological research on auditory organization. In W. Crozier & A. Chapman (Eds.), Cognitive processes in the perception of art. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, I. (1982). Husserl's account of our temporal awareness. In H. Dreyfus (Ed.), Husserl, intentionality, and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, F. (1990). Elements of computer music. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persichetti, V. (1962). Twentieth century harmony. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitot, J. (1985x). Les catastrophes de la parole de Roman Jacobson á René Thom. Paris: Maline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitot, J. (1985b). Morphogenèse du sens I. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, D. (Ed.). (1992). Auditory imagery. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics & the human sciences. Cambridge, Paris: Cambridge University Press, Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risset, J. (1991). Timbre analysis by synthesis: Representations, imitations and variants for musical composition. In G. De Poli, A. Piccialli, & C. Roads (Eds.), Representations of musical signals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, P. (1966). Traité des objets musicaux: Essai interdisciplines. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, K. (1972). The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatoryacoustic data. In E. David & P. Denes (Eds.), Human communication: A unified view. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, C. (1883/90). Tonpsychologie. Leipzig: Hirzel. (two volumes)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudnow, D. (1978). Ways of the hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. (1983). Paraboles et catastrophes. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Ehrenfels, C. (1988). On “Gestalt Qualities”. In B. Smith (Ed.), Foundations of Gestalt theory. Munich, Vienna: Philosophia Verlag. (Original work published 1890)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1967). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In W. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessel, D. (1985). Timbre space as a musical control structure. In C. Roads & J. Strawn (Eds.), Foundations of computer music. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marc Leman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Godøy, R.I. (1997). Knowledge in music theory by shapes of musical objects and sound-producing actions. In: Leman, M. (eds) Music, Gestalt, and Computing. JIC 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1317. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034109

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034109

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63526-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69591-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics