Abstract
A simplified environmental biological model has been developed based on biodegradation kinetics correlation to regulate and optimize wastewater treatment system of activated sludge process. All parameters included in the model are calibrated in accordance with reference data and experimental results and good agreements are achieved between calculated results and reference data or experimental results. The minimum bioreactor volume is used as objective function in the model and errors between optimal minimum volume of the model and each reported result of three references are found to be no more than 8.63 % after validation. Comparisons between optimal results and experimental data demonstrate that the deviations are negligible. The optimal minimum volume is 9.21 m3 with the error of 6.40 % to the practical bioreactor volume of a pilot treatment system. The environmental biological model has been applied to economically evaluate a former treatment system with native bacterium YZ1 and four operation periods of the pilot system with functional strain Fhhh compared with YZ1, Fhhh possesses higher biodegradation ability in purified terephthalic acid wastewater and a broader economic potential in the field of wastewater treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, J. C.; Chang, N. B., (2008). Mining the fuzzy control rules of aeration in a submerged biofilm wastewater treatment process., Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel., 20(7), 959–969.
Cheng, S. P.; Yan, J.; Hao, C. B.; Zhang, X. X.; Shi, L., (2002). Advancement of environmental biotechnology informatics, Environ. Pollut. Control Tech. Equipment, 3(11), 92–94.
Cheng, S. P.; Zhang, X. X.; Shi, L.; Qu, M. M.; Zhou, T.; Hao, C. B.; Yan, J., (2003). Degradation kinetics for Fhhh strain in PTA wastewater., Chinese J. Environ., Sci, 24(6), 116–120.
Choi, D. J.; Park, H. Y., (2001). A hybrid artificial neural network as a software sensor for optimal control of a wastewater treatment process., Water Res., 35(16), 3959–3967.
Corbitt, R. A.; Crawford, H. B.; Gleason, D., (1998). Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering, 2nd. (Ed.) McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, USA, 6–17.
Fu, G. W.; Cheng, S. T., (1985). Design of control system for water pollution, Tsinghua university press, Beijing, China, 77–78.
Gao, J. S.; Peng, Y. Z., (2004). Wastewater treatment systems: Modeling, diagnosis and control, chemical industry press, Beijing, China, 29–31.
Glover, G. C.; Printemps, C.; Essemiani, K.; Meinhold J., (2006). Modelling of wastewater treatment plants — how far shall we go with sophisticated modelling tools?, Water Sci. Tech., 53(3), 79–89.
Gu, X. S., (1993). Mathematical Model for Biological Wastewater Treatment, Tsinghua university press, Beijing, China,.
Gujer, W., (2006). Activated sludge modelling: Past, present and future., Water Sci. Tech., 53(3), 111–119.
Gujer, W.; Henze, M.; Mino, T.; Loosdrecht, M. V., (1999). Activated sludge model No. 3., Water Sci. Tech., 39(1), 183–193.
Hao, C. B.; Yan, J.; Qu, M. M.; Wang, D.; Cheng, S. P.; Gu, J. D.; Qiu, W. F.; Wang, Y. Y., (2003). Analysis of parental strain DNA fragments existing in GEMs-Fhhh., J. Environ. Sci., 15(5), 590–594.
Hosseini, F.; Malekzadeh, F.; Amirniiozafari, N.; Ghaemi, N., (2007) Biodegradation of anionic surfactants by isolated bacteria from activated sludge., Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4(1), 127–132.
Hu, Z. R.; Wentzel, M. C.; Ekama, G. A., (2007). A general kinetic model for biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems: Model evaluation, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 98(6), 1259–1275.
IWA Task Group, (2000). Activated sludge models ASM 1, ASM 2, ASM 2D and ASM 3, Scientific and technical report No. 9, IWA Task Group on Mathematical Modelling IWA Publishing, London, UK.
Li, W. X.; Zhang, X. X.; Wu, B.; Sun, S. L.; Chen, Y. S.; Pan, W. Y.; Zhao, D.Y.; Cheng, S. P., (2008) A comparative analysis of environmental quality assessment methods for heavy metal-contaminated soils, Pedosphere, 18(3), 344–352.
Lee, C. C.; Lin, S. D., (1999). Handbook of Environmental Engineering Calculations, McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, USA, 1.545–1.551.
Middleton, A. C.; Lawrence, A. W., (1974). Cost optimization of activated sludge systems., Biotechnol. Bioeng., 16(6), 807–826.
Mino, T.; San Pedro, D. C.; Yamamoto, S.; Matsuo, T., (1997). Application of the IAWQ activated sludge model to nutrient removal process., Water Sci. Tech., 35(8), 111–118.
Mohanan, S.; Maruthamuthu, S.; Muthukumar, N.; Rajesekar, A.; Palaniswamy, N., (2007). Biodegradation of palmarosa oil (green oil) by Serratia marcescens., Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4(2), 279–2
Oda, T.; Yano, T.; Niboshi Y., (2006). Development and exploitation of a multipurpose CFD tool for optimisation of microbial reaction and sludge flow., Water Sci. Tech., 53(3), 101–110.
Okubo, T.; Kubo, K.; Hosomi, M.; Murakami, A., (1994). A knowledge-based decision support system for selection small-scale waste-water treatment processes., Water Sci. Tech., 30(2), 175–184.
Panjeshahi, M. H.; Ataei A., (2008). Application of an environmentally optimum cooling water system design in water and energy conservation., Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 5(2), 251–262.
Qin, L. Y., (1989). Biological treatment of wastewater, Tongji University Press, Shanghai, China, 55–71.
Rashidinejad, F.; Osanloo, M.; Rezai, B., (2008). An environmental oriented model for optimum cut-off grades in open pit mining projects to minimize acid mine drainage., Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 5(2), 183–194.
Reichert, P.; Von Schulthess, R.; Wild, D., (1995). The use of AQUASIM for estimating parameters of activated sludge models., Water Sci. Tech., 31(2), 135–147.
Ribas, F.; Rodriguez-Roda, I.; Serrat, J.; Clara, P.; Comas, J., (2008). Development and implementation of an expert system to improve the control of nitrification and denitrification in the Vic wastewater treatment plant., Environ. Tech., 29(5), 583–590.
Rivas, A.; Irizar, I.; Ayesa, E., (2008). Model-based optimisation of wastewater treatment plants design., Environ. Modell. Softw., 23(4), 435–450.
Souza, S. M.; Araújo, O. Q. F.; Coelho, M. A. Z., (2008). Model-based optimization of a sequencing batch reactor for biological nitrogen removal, Bioresource Tech., 99(8), 3213–3223.
Sun, S. L.; Cheng, S. P.; Wan, Y. Q.; Zhang, X. X.; Shi, L.; Zhu, C. J.; Yu, H. X., (2005). Pilot regulation of MnP-SA to treat PTA wastewater, J. Environ. Sci., 17(3), 375–378.
Suzuki, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Haesslein, M.; Seyfried, C. F., (1999). Development of simulation model for a combined activated-sludge and biofilm process to remove nitrogen and phosphorus., Water Environ. Res., 71(4), 388–397.
Templeton, M. R.; Hofmann, R.; Andrews, R. C.; Whitby, G. E., (2006). Biodosimetry testing of a simplified computational model for the UV disinfection of wastewater., J. Environ. Eng. Sci., 5(1), 29–36.
Von Sperling, M., (1994). Calibration of poorly identifiable systems — Application to activated sludge model., J. Environ. Eng-ASCE, 120(3), 625–644.
Woodard, F., (2001). Industrial waste treatment handbook. Butterworth-Heinemann Inc, Woburn, USA, 260–26
Zeidan, A.; Rohani, S.; Bassi, A.; Whitting, P., (2003). BioSys: Software for wastewater treatment simulation., Adv. Eng. Softw., 34(9), 539–549.
Zhang, X. X.; Cheng, S. P.; Sun, S. L.; Zhu, C. J.; Zhao, D. Y., (2006a). A pilot study on the biological treatment of PTA wastewater with functional strain Fhhh., Environ. Eng. Sci., 23(6), 1065–1072.
Zhang, X. X.; Cheng, S. P.; Wan, Y. Q.; Sun, S.L.; Zhu, C. J.; Zhao, D. Y.; Pan, W. Y., (2006b). Degradability of five aromatic compounds in a pilot wastewater treatment system, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 58(2), 94–98.
Zhang, X. X.; Wan, Y. Q.; Cheng, S. P.; Sun, S. L.; Zhu, C. J.; Li, W. X.; Zhang, X. C.; Wang, G. L.; Lu, J. H.; Luo, X.; Gu, J. D., (2005). Purified terephthalic acid wastewater biodegradation and toxicity., J. Environ. Sci., 17(5), 876–880.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X.X., Zhao, D.Y., Wang, Z.X. et al. Environmental biological model based on optimization of activated sludge process. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 6, 69–76 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326061
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326061