Skip to main content
Log in

An optimum multivariate-multiobjective stratified sampling design

  • Published:
METRON Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

It is well known that in stratified sampling design when the measurement cost does not vary from stratum to stratum, an estimate of population mean or total constructed from a sample selected according to Neyman allocation is the most precise estimate. But unfortunately the practical use of Neyman allocation suffers from a number of limitations. The most serious of all is the absence of the true values of the stratum standard deviations. When the strata standard deviations are unknown but we have additional information about the equality of standard deviations between some of the strata, we can use this information to increase the precision of the estimate by pooling the strata with equal standard deviations as a single stratum and using Neyman and proportional allocations together. This paper studies the case of multiple pooling of the standard deviations in a multivariate stratified sampling when the number of strata is more than three. The problem is formulated as a Multiobjective Nonlinear Programming Problem. A solution procedure is developed using Goal Programming approach. For computation purpose, the software LINGO is used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahsan, M. J. and Khan, S. U. (1977) Optimum allocation in multivariate stratified random sampling using prior information, Journal of Indian Statistical Association, 15, 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahsan, M. J. and Khan, S. U. (1982) Optimum allocation in multivariate stratified random sampling with overhead cost, Metrika, 29, 71–78.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ahsan, M. J., Najmussehar and Khan, M. G. M. (2005) Mixed allocation in stratified sampling, Aligarh Journal of Statistics, 25, 87–97.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, A. H., Najmussehar and Ahsan, M. J. (2009) On multiple response stratified random sampling design, Journal of Statistical Sciences, Kolkata, India, 1(1), 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoyama, H. (1963) Stratified random sampling with optimum allocation for multivariate populations, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 14, 251–258.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, L. G. and Afonja, B. (1971) Use of the generalized variance and the gradient projection method in multivariate stratified random sampling, Biometrics, 27, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bankier, M. D. (1988) Power allocations: determining sample sizes for sub national areas, The American Statistician, 42, 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethel, J. (1989) Sample allocation in multivariate surveys, Survey Methodology, 15(1), 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S. (1967) A note on optimum allocation, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 50, 40–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S. (1968) Multivariate stratified surveys, Journal of American Statistical Association, 63, 530–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dalenius, T. (1957) Sampling in Sweden: contributions to the methods and theories of sample survey practice, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-garcía, J. A. and Cortez, L. U. (2006) Optimum allocation in multivariate stratified sampling: multi-objective programming, Comunicación TécnicaNo. I-06-07/28-03-2006(PE/CIMAT).

  • Díaz-garcía, J. A. and Cortez, L. U. (2008) Multi-objective optimisation for optimum allocation in multivariate stratified sampling, Survey Methodology, 34(2), 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folks, J. L. and Antle, C. E. (1965) Optimum allocation of sampling units to the strata when there are R responses of interest, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 225–233.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S. P. (1958) A note on stratified random sampling with multiple characters, Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin, 8, 81–89.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, A. (2002) A multiparameter perspective on the choice of sampling design in surveys, Statistics in Transition, 5(6), 969–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahan, N., Khan, M. G. M. and Ahsan, M. J. (1994) A generalized compromise allocation, Journal of the Indian Statistical Association, 32, 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. G. M., Ahsan, M. J. and Jahan, N. (1997) Compromise allocation in multivariate stratified sampling: an integer solution, Naval Research Logistics, 44, 69–79.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. G. M., Khan, E. A. and Ahsan, M. J. (2003) An optimal multivariate stratified sampling design using dynamic programming, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 45(1), 107–113.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kokan, A. R. and Khan, S. U. (1967) Optimum allocation in multivariate surveys: an analytical solution, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 29(1), 115–125.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak, M. (2006a) Multivariate sample allocation: application of random search method, Statistics in Transition, 7(4), 889–900.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak, M. (2006b) On sample allocation in multivariate surveys, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 35, 901–910.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kreienbrock, L. (1993) Generalized measures of dispersion to solve the allocation problem in multivariate stratified random sampling, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 22(1), 219–239.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lingo user’s guide (2001) LINGO-user’s guide, Published by LINDO SYSTEM INC., 1415, North Dayton Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60622, USA.

  • Mahalanobis, P. C. (1944) On large-scale sample surveys, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 231, 329–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melaku, A. and Sadasivan, G. (1987) L1-norm and other methods for sample allocation in multivariate stratified surveys, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 5(4), 415–423.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J. (1934) On the two different aspects of the representative method: the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 97 (4) 558–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., Na, S. and Jeon, J. (2007) Compromise allocation in univariate stratified sampling, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 36, 265–271.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, A. (1954) A simple presentation of optimum sampling results, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 16(2), 239–241.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sukhatme, P. V., Sukhatme, B. V., Sukhatme, S. and Asok, C. (1984) Sampling theory of surveys with applications, 3rd ed., Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa and Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. (1960) Sampling methods for censuses and surveys, 3rd ed., Charles Griffin and Co., London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athar Hussain Ansari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ansari, A.H., Varshney, R., Najmussehar et al. An optimum multivariate-multiobjective stratified sampling design. METRON 69, 227–250 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263559

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263559

Keywords

Navigation