Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of eight small supernumerary marker chromosomes originating from chromosomes 2, 4, 8,18, and 21 in three patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) are a morphologically heterogeneous group of additional structurally abnormal chromosomes that cannot be identified unambiguously by conventional banding techniques alone. Molecular cytogenetic methods enable detailed characterization of sSMCs; however, in many cases interpretation of their clinical significance is problematic. The aim of our study was to characterize precisely sSMCs identified in three patients with dysmorphic features, psychomotor retardation and multiple congenital anomalies. We also attempted to correlate the patients’ genotypes with phenotypes by inclusion of data from the literature. The sSMCs were initially detected by G-banding analysis in peripheral blood lymphocytes in these patients and were subsequently characterized using multicolor fluorescencein situ hybridization (M-FISH), (sub)centromere-specific multicolor FISH (cenM-FISH, subcenM-FISH), and multicolor banding (MCB) techniques. Additionally, the sSMCs in two patients were also studied by hybridization to whole-genome bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) arrays (array-CGH) to map the breakpoints on a single BAC clone level. In all three patients, the chromosome origin, structure, and euchromatin content of the sSMCs were determined. In patient RS, only a neocentric r(2)(q35q36) was identified. It is a second neocentric sSMC(2) in the literature and the first marker chromosome derived from the terminal part of 2q. In the other two patients, two sSMCs were found, as M-FISH detected additional sSMCs that could not be characterized in G-banding analysis. In patient MK, each of four cell lines contained der(4)(:p1 1.1→q12:) accompanied by a sSMC(18): r(18)(:p11.2→q11.1∷p11.2→q11.1:), inv dup(18)(:p11.1→q11.1∷q11.1→p11.1:), or der(18)(:p11.2→q11.1∷q11.1→p11.1:). In patient NP, with clinical features of trisomy 8p, three sSMCs were characterized: r(8)(:p12 →q11.1∷q11.1 →p21:) der(8) (:p11.22→q11.1∷q11.1→p21∷p21→p11.22:) and der(21)(:p11.1→q21.3:). The BAC array results confirmed the molecular cytogenetic results and refined the breakpoints to the single BAC clone resolution. However, the complex mosaic structure of the marker chromosomes derived from chromosomes 8 and 18 could only be identified by molecular cytogenetic methods. This study confirms the usefulness of multicolor FISH combined with whole-genome arrays for comprehensive analyses of marker chromosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderlid BM, Sigrid Sahlén S, Schoumans J, Holmberg E, Åhsgren I, Mortier G, et al. 2001. Detailed characterization of 12 supernumerary ring chromosomes using micro-FISH and search for uniparental disomy. Am J Med Genet 99: 223–233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batanian JR, Huang Y, Gottesman GS, Grange DK, Blasingame AV, 2000. Preferential involvement of the short arm in chromosome 8-derived supernumerary markers and ring as identified by chromosome arm painting. Am J Med Genet 90: 276–282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch O, Loitzsch A, Kozlowski P, Mazauric ML, Hickmann G, 2005. Forty-two supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs) in 43273 prenatal samples: chromosomal distribution, clinical findings, and UPD studies. Eur J Hum Genet 13: 1192–1204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumer A, Giovannucci Uzielli ML, Guarducci S, Lapi E, Röhlisberger B, Schinzel A, 2002. Meiotic origin of two ring chromosomes 18 in a girl with developmental delay. Am JMed Genet 113: 101–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blennov E, Anneren G, Bui TH, Berggren E, Asadi E, Nordenskjöld M, 1993. Characterization of supernumerary ring marker chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Am J Hum Genet 53: 433–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocian E, Nowakowska B, Obersztyn E, Borg K, Chudoba I, Kostyk E, et al. 2006. Characterization of marker chromosomes with molecular cytogenetic methods in patients with mental retardation and congenital malformations. Developmental Period Medicine 10: 211–225.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet C, Zix C, Gregoire MJ, Brochet K, Duc M, Rousselet F, et al. 2006. Characterization of mosaic supernumerary ring chromosomes by array-CGH: segmental aneusomy for proximal 4q in a child with tall stature and obesity. Am J Med Genet A 140: 233–237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckton K, Spowart G, Newton MS, Evans HJ, 1985. Forty-four probands with an additional ‘marker chromosome’. Hum Genet 69: 353–370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler MG, Roback EW, Allen GA, Dev VC, 1995. Identification of a ring chromosome as a ring 8 using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in a child with multiple congenital anomalies. Am J Med Genet 57: 494–495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cai WW, Mao JH, Chow CW, Damani S, Balmain A, Bradley A, 2002. Genome-wide detection of chromosomal imbalances in tumors using BAC microarrays. Nat Biotechnol 20: 393–396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chudoba I, Plesch A, Lörch T, Lemke J, Claussen U, Senger G, 1999. High-resolution multicolour-banding: a new technique for refined FISH analysis of human chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 84: 156–160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crolla JA, 1998. FISH and molecular studies of autosomal supernumerary marker chromosomes excluding those derived from chromosome 15 II. Review of the literature. Am J Med Genet 75: 367–381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crolla JA, Sheila AY, Ennis S, Jackobs PA, 2005. Supernumerary marker chromosomes in man: parental origin, mosaicism and maternal age revisited. Eur J Hum Genet 13: 154–160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel A, 1979. Normal phenotype and partial trisomy for the G positive region of chromosome 21. J Med Genet 117A: 227–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel A, Malafiej P, 2003. A series of supernumerary small ring marker autosomes identified by FISH with chromosome probe arrays and literature review exlcluding chromosome 15. Am J Med Genet 117A: 212–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demori E, Devescovi R, Benussi DG, Dolce S, Carrozzi M, Villa N, et al. 2004. Supernumerary ring chromosome 8: clinical and molecular cytogenetic characterization in a case report. Am J Med Genet 130A: 288–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engelen JJ, de Die-Smulers CE, Sijstermans JM, Meers LE, Albrechts JC, Hamers AJ, 1995. Familial partial trisomy of 8p without dysmorphic features and only mild mental retardation. J Med Genet 32: 792–795.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fang YY, Eyre HJ, Bohlander SK, Estop A, McPherson E, Trager T, et al. 1995. Mechanisms of small ring formation suggested by the molecular characterization of two small accessory ring chromosomes derived from chromosome 4. Am J Hum Genet 57: 1137–1142.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz B, Müller-Navia J, Hillig U, Köhler M, Mücevher A, Rehder H, 1999. Trisomy 2q35-q37 due to insertion of 2q material into 17q25: clinical, cytogentic, and molecular cytogenetic characterization. Am J Med Genet 87: 297–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardino D, Finelli P, Russo S, Gottardi G, Rodeschini O, Atza MG, et al. 2002. Small familial supernumerary ring chromosome 2: FISH characterization and genotype-phenotype correlation. Am J Med Genet 111: 319–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guanciali-Franchi P, Calabrese G, Morizio E, Fantasia D, Colosimo A, Rinaldi MM, et al. 2004. Identification of 14 rare marker chromosomes and derivatives by spectral karyotyping in prenatal and postnatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet 127A: 144–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings RJ, Nisbet DL, Waters K, Spencer T, Chitty LS, 1999. Prenatal detection of extra structurally abnormal chromosomes (ESACs): new cases and a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 19: 436–445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotzot D, 2002. Supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMC) and uniparental disomy (UPD): coincidence or consequence? J Med Genet 39: 775–778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langer S, Fauth C, Rocchi M, Murken J, Speicher MR, 2001. AcroM fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses of marker chromosomes. Hum Genet 109: 152–158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lasan Trčić R, Hitrec V, Letica L, Ćuk M, Begović D, 2003. Small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from proximal p-arm of chromosome 2: Identification by fluorescentin situ hybridization. Croat Med J 44: 477–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Jiang T, Bejjani B, Rajcan-Separovic E, Cai WW, 2003. High-resolution human genome scanning using whole-genome BAC arrays. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 68: 323–329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Thoma K, Kammler K, Gehring C, Ekici A, Bathke KD, et al. 1995. Direct preparation of uncultured EDTA-treated or heparinized blood for interphase FISH analysis. Appl Cytogenet 21: 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Heller A, Starke H, Rubtsov N, Trifonov V, Mrasek K, et al. 2002. Microdissection-based high-resolution multicolor banding for all 24 human chromosomes. Int J Mol Med 9: 335–339.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Starke H, Weise A, Lehrer H, Claussen U, 2004. Multicolor FISH probe set and their applications. Histol Histopathol 19: 229–237.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Hickmann G, Kozlowski P, Claussen U, Starke H, 2004a. Molecular — cytogenetic characterization of the origin and the presence of pericentromeric euchromatin on minute supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs). Chromosome Res 12: 239–244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Claussen U, Starke H, 2004b. Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in humans. Cytogenet Genome Res 107: 55–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Mrasek K, Weise A, Kuechler A, von Eggeling F, Claussen U, Starke H, 2004c. Characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in human. Current Genomics 5: 279–286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Mrasek K, Weise A, Dufke A, Rodríguez L, Martínez Guardia N, et al. 2006. Small supernumerary marker chromosomes — progress towards a genotype-phenotype correlation. Cytogenet Genome Res 112: 23–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loeffler J, Soelder E, Erdel M, Utermann B, Janecke A, Duba HC, Utermann G, 2003. Muellerian aplasia associated with ring chromosome 8p12q12 mosaicism. Am J Med Genet 116A: 290–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mrasek K, Starke H, Liehr T, 2005. Another small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 2: towards a genotype/phenotype correlation. J Histochem Cytochem 53: 367–370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzel A, Rocchi M, Starke H, Heller A, Fiedler W, Wlodarska I, et al. 2001. A new multicolor-FISH approach for the characterization of marker chromosomes: centromere-specific multicolor-FISH (cenM-FISH). Hum Genet 108: 199–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ostroverkhova NV, Nazarenko SA, Rubtsov NB, Nazarenko LP, Bunina EN, 1999. Characterization of a small supernumerary ring marker derived from chromosome 2 by forward and reverse chromosome painting. Am J Med Genet 87: 217–220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park JP, Wurster-Hill DH, Andrews PA, Cooley WC, Graham JM, 1987. Three proximal trisomy 21 without the Down syndrome. Clin Genet 32: 342–348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petit P, Fryns JP, 1997. Intersitial deletion 2p accompanied by marker chromosome formation of the deleted segment resulting in a stable acentric marker chromosome. Genet Couns 8: 341–343.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plattner R, Heerema NA, Howard-Peebles PN, Miles JH, Soukup S, Palmer CG, 1993. Clinical findings in patients with marker chromosomes identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 91: 589–598.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senger G, Chudoba I, Plesch A, 1998. Multicolor-FISH - the identification of chromosome aberrations by 24 colors. Bioforum 9: 499–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel M, Hickmann G, Senger G, Kozlowski P, Bartsch O, 2003. Two new cases of analphoid marker chromosomes. Am J Med Genet 116A: 284–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Starke H, Raida M, Trifonov V, Clement JH, Loncarevic IF, Heller A, et al. 2001. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of an acquired minute superumerary marker chromosome as the sole abnormality in a case clinically diagnosed as atypical Philadelphia-negative chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Br J Haematol 113: 435–438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Starke H, Nietzel A, Weise A, Heller A, Mrasek K, Belitz B, et al. 2003. Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs): genotype-phenotype correlation and classification. Hum Genet 114: 51–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Rubinstein J, Soukup S, Palmer CG, 1995. Marker chromosome 21 identified by microdissection and FISH. Am J Med Genet 2: 151–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telenius H, Carter NP, Bebb CE, Nordenskjold M, Ponder BA, 1992. Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. 13: 718–725.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timur AA, Sadgephour A, Graf M, Schwartz S, Libby ED, Driscoll DJ, Wang Q, 2004. Identification and molecular characterization of a de novo supernumerary ring chromosome 18 in a patient with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. Ann Hum Genet 68: 353–361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb T, 1994. Inv dup(15) supernumerary marker chromosomes. J Med Genet 31: 585–594.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weise A, Starke H, Heller A, Tönnies H, Volleth M, Stumm M, et al. 2002. Chromosome 2 aberrations in clinical cases characterised by high-resolution multicolour banding and region specific FISH probes. J Med Genet 39: 434–439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verma RS, Babu A, 1998. Human chromosomes —manual of basic technologies, 4th ed. New York: Pergamon Press: 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa N, Riva P, Colombo D, Sala E, Mariani S, Zorloni C, et al. 2001. Identification of a small supernumerary marker chromosome, r(2)(p10q11.2), and the problem of determining prognosis. Prenat Diagn 21: 801–805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viersbach R, Engels H, Gamerdinger U, Hansmann M, 1998. Delineation of supernumerary marker chromosomes in 38 patients. Am J Med Gen 76: 351–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewa Bocian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pietrzak, J., Mrasek, K., Obersztyn, E. et al. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of eight small supernumerary marker chromosomes originating from chromosomes 2, 4, 8,18, and 21 in three patients. J Appl Genet 48, 167–175 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03194675

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03194675

Keywords

Navigation