Skip to main content
Log in

Large aftershocks triggering by Coulomb failure stress following the 2001M S=8.1 great Kunlun earthquake

  • Published:
Acta Seismologica Sinica

Abstract

The great Kunlun earthquake occurred on Nov. 14, 2001 in Qinghai Province, China. Five large aftershocks with magnitude larger than 5.0 occurred near the Kunlun fault after main shock. Calculations of the change in Coulomb failure stress reveal that 4 of 5 large aftershocks occurred in areas with Δσf>0 (10−2–10−1 MPa) and one aftershock occurred in an area with Δσf=−0.56 MPa. It is concluded that the permanent fault displacement due to the main shock is the main cause of activity of large aftershocks, but not the whole cause.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Editorial board forLithospheric Dynamics Atlas of China, State Seismological Bureau. 1989.Lithospheric Dynamics Atlas of China [M]. Beijing: China cartographic publishing house, 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardebeck J L, Nazareth J J, Hauksson E. 1998. The static stress change triggering model: Constraints from two southern California aftershock sequences [J].J Geophys Res,98: 4 461–4 472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R A. 1998. Introduction to special section: Stress triggers, stress shadows, and implications for seismic hazard [J].J Geophys Res,103: 24 347–24 358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilb D, J. Gomberg, P. Bodin. 2000. Triggering of earthquake aftershocks by dynamic stresses [J].Nature,408: 570–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King G C P, Stein R S, J Lin. 1994. Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes [J].Bull Seism Soc Amer,84: 935–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • LIU Gui-ping, FU Zheng-xiang. 2002. The triggering mechanism of the largest aftershock (M S=6.3) of the 1973 Luhuo great earthquake (M S=7.6) [J].Earthquake Research in China,18: 175–182 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada Y. 1992. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space [J].Bull Seism Soc Amer,82: 1018–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reasenberg P A, Simpson R W. 1992. Response of regional seismicity to the static stress change produced by the Loma Prieta earthquake [J].Science,255: 1 687–1 690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson R W, P A Reasenberg. 1994. Earthquake-induced static stress changes on central California faults [A]. In: Simpson R W ed. The Loma Prieta, California Earthquake of October 17, 1989—Tectonic processes and models [C].U S Geol Surv Prof Pap, F55–F89.

  • Stein R S, King G C P, Lin J. 1992. Change in failure stress on the southern San Andreas fault system caused by the 1992M=7.4 Landers earthquake [J].Science,258: 1 328–1 332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda S. 1998. Stress transferred by the 1995M w=6.9 Kobe, Japan, shock: Effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities [J].J Geophys Res,103: 24 543–24 565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WAN Yong-ge, WU Zhong-liang, ZHOU Gong-wei,et al. 2000. “Stress triggering” between different rupture events in several earthquakes [J].Acta Seismologica Sinica,13(6): 568–576 (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Chen W, Ma W,et al. 2002. Surface rupture of the Kunlunshan earthquake (M S=8.1), Northern Tibetan Plateau, China [J].Seism Res Lett,73: 884–892.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Foundation item: The State Sciences and Technology Key Project During the Tenth Five-year Plan (2001BA601B02-02-04) China-Greece International Cooperative Research Project on Seismology and Chinese Joint Seismological Science Foundation (103073).

About this article

Cite this article

Hao, P., Fu, Zx., Tian, Qj. et al. Large aftershocks triggering by Coulomb failure stress following the 2001M S=8.1 great Kunlun earthquake. Acta Seismologica Sinica 17, 31–37 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191392

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191392

Key words

CLC number

Document code

Navigation