Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of significant others’ actual appraisals on children’s self-perceptions: What about Cooley’s assumption for children?

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to study the construction of children’s self-perception relying on Cooley’s hypothesis. More precisely, we were interested in the mediation effect of significant others’ actual appraisal on self-perception by the perception of others’ actual appraisal (i.e., reflected appraisal). First, we argued that this mediation effect would occur in the domains where children have feedback from significant others (here teacher or parents). Second, we took into account two measures of reflected appraisal: reflected appraisal assessed in a classic fashion and appraisal social support assessed with Harter’s scale (1985b). We argued that reflected appraisal assessed in a classic fashion would be a better mediator of the effect of actual appraisal on self-perception by reflected appraisal in comparison to appraisal social support. In order to test these hypotheses, we conducted a study with 126 children (age 8–9), 106 parents and six teachers. The results, taken as a whole, support these hypotheses.

Résumé

Le but de cet article est d’étudier la construction des perceptions de soi des enfants à partir de l’hypothèse de Cooley (1902). Plus précisément, nous nous intéressons à la médiation de l’effet du jugement des personnes signifiantes sur les perceptions de soi par la perception de ce jugement (i.e., perception prêtée). Premièrement, nous faisons l’hypothèse que cette médiation sera observée uniquement dans les domaines où l’enfant reçoit des feedback d’une personne signifiante (ici l’enseignant ou les parents). Deuxièmement, nous avons pris en compte deux mesures de perceptions prêtées pouvant être considérées comme équivalentes: une mesure classique et une mesure de soutien social d’approbation (Harter, 1985b). Nous faisons l’hypothèse que les perceptions prêtées mesurées de manière classique seraient un meilleur médiateur de l’effet du jugement des personnes signifiantes sur les perceptions de soi que la mesure de soutien social d’approbation. Afin de tester ces hypothèses, nous avons conduit une étude auprès de 126 enfants âgés de 8–9 ans, de 106 parents et de six enseignants. Pris dans leur ensemble, les résultats vont dans le sens de nos hypothèses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bois, J.E., Sarrazin, P.G., Brustad, R.J., Chanal, J.P., & Trouilloud, D.O. (2005). Parents’ appraisals, reflected appraisals, and children’s self-appraisals of sport competence: A yearlong study.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17, 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Gagnon, C. (1992). A reassessment of the Self-Perception Profile for Children: Factor structure, reliability, and convergent validity of a French version among second through sixth grade children.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 15, 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressoux, P., & Pansu, P. (2003).Quand les enseignants jugent leurs élèves. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J.R., Epley, N., Savitsky, K., & Windschitl, P.D. (2008). Knowing too much: Using private knowledge to predict how one is viewed by others.Psychological Science, 19, 542–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D.A. (1991). Change in self-perceived competence as a function of peer and teacher evaluation.Developmental Psychology, 27, 682–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D.A., Gondoli, D., & Peeke, L. (1998). Structure and validity of parent and teacher perceptions of children’s competence: A multitrait-multimethod-multigroup investigation.Psychological Assessment, 10, 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D.A., Jacquez, F.M., & Maschman, T.L. (2001). Social origins of depressive cognitions: A longitudinal study of self-perceived competence in children.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D.A., Maxwell, S.E., & Martin, J.M. (1997). Reflected self-appraisals: Strength and structure of the relation of teacher, peer, and parent ratings to children’s self-perceived competencies.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D.A., Maxwell, S.E., Martin, J.M., Peeke, L.G., Seroczynski, A.D., Tram, J.M., Hoffman, K.B., Ruiz, M.D., Jacquez, F., & Maschman, T. (2001). The development of multiple domains of child and adolescent self-concept: A cohort sequential longitudinal design.Child Development, 72, 1723–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W.L., & Douglas, E. M. (1998). The looking-glass self in family context: A social relations analysis.Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C.H. (1902).Human nature and the social order (1964 ed.). New York: Scocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R.B. (1985). Reflected appraisal and the development of self.Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R.B. (1989). Parents and the reflected appraisal process: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 965–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, M.S., & MacKinnon, D.P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect.Psychological Science, 18, 233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D.C., & Colvin, C.R. (1997). Congruence of others’ and self-judgments of personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.),Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 617–647): Academic press.

  • Gest, S.D., Domitrovich, C.E., & Welsh, J.A. (2005). Peer academic reputation in elementary school: Association with changes in self-concept and academic skills.Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 337–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D., Atkins, R., & Tursi, N. (2006). Origins and Developmental Influences on Self-Esteem. In M.H. Kernis (Ed.),Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of current perspectives (pp. 157–162) New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1985a).Manual for the self-perception profile for children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1985b).Manual for the social support scale for children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1999).The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K., Swindle, R.W., & Dusenbury, L. (1986). Component social support processes: Comments integration.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 466–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, J., & Stipek, D. (2005). The emergence of gender differences in children’s perceptions of their academic competence.Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 276–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hergovich, A., Sirsch, U., & Felinger, M. (2002). Self-appraisals, actual appraisals and reflected appraisals of preadolescent children.Social Behaviour and Personality, 30, 603–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C.M., & McClelland, G.H. (1989).Data analysis: A model comparison approach. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L. (1986). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and integrative review.Psychological Review, 93, 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L., Soffin, S., Brown, R., & Kohlhepp, K. (1992). Understanding reactions to feedback by integrating ideas from symbolic interactionism and cognitive evaluation theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 402–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M.R. (2006). To what extent is self-esteem influenced by interpersonal as compared with intrapersonal processes? What are these processes? In M.H. Kernis (Ed.),Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of current perspectives (pp. 195–200). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, T.E., Albright, L., Kenny, D.A., Agatstein, F., & Winquist, L. (1997). Interpersonal perception and metaperception in nonoverlapping social groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 390–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Cross, S. (1990). The interpersonal self. In L.A. Pervin (Ed.),Handbook of personnality. Theory and research (pp. 576–608). New York, London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social cognitive perspective.Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narciss, S. (2004). The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning.Experimental Psychology, 51, 214–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piek, J.P., Dworcan, M., Barrett, N.C., & Coleman, R. (2000). Determinants of self-worth in children with and without developmental coordination disorder.International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47, 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in simple and multiple mediator models.Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N.S. (1995). Evaluating the nature of perceived support and its relation to perceived self-worth in adolescents.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5, 253–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, B.R., Pierce, G.R., Bannerman, A., & Sarason, I.G. (1993). Investigating the antecedents of perceived social support: Parents’ views of and behavior toward their children.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1071–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrauger, J.S., & Schoeneman, T.J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Trough the looking glass darkly.Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P.E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J.V., & Wilson, A.E. (2003). How important is social comparison. In M.R. Leary & J.P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 344–366). New York, London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cécile Nurra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nurra, C., Pansu, P. The impact of significant others’ actual appraisals on children’s self-perceptions: What about Cooley’s assumption for children?. Eur J Psychol Educ 24, 247–262 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173015

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173015

Key words

Navigation