Skip to main content
Log in

Establishing the level of digitization for wrist and hand radiographs for the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, radiographs of the hands and knees were taken of participants 60 years and older as part of the study of arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions. The purpose of the study was to decide the digitizing resolution to be used for these radiographs. A set of wrist and hand radiographs (N=49) was graded by two radiologists for degree of bone erosions and served as a “gold standard.” The radiographs were then digitized at three resolution levels; low-resolution 150μm (2001×1634×12 bit matrix); intermediate-resolution 100 μm (3000×2400×12 bit matrix); and high-resolution 50 μm (4900×3000×12 bit matrix). A comparison of the digital images versus the gold standard reading was made at the three resolutions by two radiologists. Kappa statistics suggested fair (K>.4) to excellent (K>.75) agreement between the gold standard and the images at all levels. Intraclass correlation coefficient suggested high agreement between readers (ICC>.5), with minimal individual reader effect. Variance component estimates showed that the major contribution (78–83%) to scoring came from variability in the images themselves, not from the readers. The 100μm resolution was selected over the 150 and 50 μm on the basis of practical considerations such as storage requirements, display time, and easier manipulation of the digital images by the readers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). National Center for Health Statistics: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94, Plan and Operations Procedures Manuals (CD-ROM). Hyattsville, MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jonsson A, Borg A, Hannesson P, et al: Film-screen vs. digital radiography in rheumatoid arthritis of the hand an ROC analysis. Acta Radiologica 35:311–318, 1994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sayre J, Aberle DR, Boechat MI, et al: Effect of data compression on diagnostic accuracy in digital hand and chest radiography. Proc SPIE 1653:232–240, 1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Del Puente A, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, et al: High incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in Pima Indians. Am J Epidemiol 129:1170–1178, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobsson LTH, Knowler WC, Pillemer SR, et al: A cross-sectional and longitudinal comparison of the Rome criteria for active rheumatoid arthritis (equivalent to the American College of Rheumatology 1958 criteria) and the American College of Rheumatology 1987 criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:1479–1486, 1994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. The Department of Rheumatology and Medical Illustration and Manchester Royal Infirmary and the Empire Rheumatism Council’s Field Unit: The Epidemiology of Chronic Rheumatism, Volume II, in Atlas of Standard Radiographs of Arthritis. Philadelphia, PA, F.A. Davis Company, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fleiss JL: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, (2nd ed). New York, NY, Wiley 1981

    Google Scholar 

  8. Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174, 1977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86:420–428, 1979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. SAS Institute, Inc: SAS/STAT User’s Guide (vol 2). Cary, NC, SAS Institute, 1990, pp 1661–1673

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shavelson RJ, Webb NM: Generalizability Theory: A Primer. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ostchega, Y., Rodney Long, L., Goh, GH. et al. Establishing the level of digitization for wrist and hand radiographs for the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Digit Imaging 11, 116 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168734

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168734

Key words

Navigation