Abstract
In the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, radiographs of the hands and knees were taken of participants 60 years and older as part of the study of arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions. The purpose of the study was to decide the digitizing resolution to be used for these radiographs. A set of wrist and hand radiographs (N=49) was graded by two radiologists for degree of bone erosions and served as a “gold standard.” The radiographs were then digitized at three resolution levels; low-resolution 150μm (2001×1634×12 bit matrix); intermediate-resolution 100 μm (3000×2400×12 bit matrix); and high-resolution 50 μm (4900×3000×12 bit matrix). A comparison of the digital images versus the gold standard reading was made at the three resolutions by two radiologists. Kappa statistics suggested fair (K>.4) to excellent (K>.75) agreement between the gold standard and the images at all levels. Intraclass correlation coefficient suggested high agreement between readers (ICC>.5), with minimal individual reader effect. Variance component estimates showed that the major contribution (78–83%) to scoring came from variability in the images themselves, not from the readers. The 100μm resolution was selected over the 150 and 50 μm on the basis of practical considerations such as storage requirements, display time, and easier manipulation of the digital images by the readers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). National Center for Health Statistics: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94, Plan and Operations Procedures Manuals (CD-ROM). Hyattsville, MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1996
Jonsson A, Borg A, Hannesson P, et al: Film-screen vs. digital radiography in rheumatoid arthritis of the hand an ROC analysis. Acta Radiologica 35:311–318, 1994
Sayre J, Aberle DR, Boechat MI, et al: Effect of data compression on diagnostic accuracy in digital hand and chest radiography. Proc SPIE 1653:232–240, 1992
Del Puente A, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, et al: High incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in Pima Indians. Am J Epidemiol 129:1170–1178, 1989
Jacobsson LTH, Knowler WC, Pillemer SR, et al: A cross-sectional and longitudinal comparison of the Rome criteria for active rheumatoid arthritis (equivalent to the American College of Rheumatology 1958 criteria) and the American College of Rheumatology 1987 criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:1479–1486, 1994
The Department of Rheumatology and Medical Illustration and Manchester Royal Infirmary and the Empire Rheumatism Council’s Field Unit: The Epidemiology of Chronic Rheumatism, Volume II, in Atlas of Standard Radiographs of Arthritis. Philadelphia, PA, F.A. Davis Company, 1963
Fleiss JL: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, (2nd ed). New York, NY, Wiley 1981
Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174, 1977
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86:420–428, 1979
SAS Institute, Inc: SAS/STAT User’s Guide (vol 2). Cary, NC, SAS Institute, 1990, pp 1661–1673
Shavelson RJ, Webb NM: Generalizability Theory: A Primer. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1991
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ostchega, Y., Rodney Long, L., Goh, GH. et al. Establishing the level of digitization for wrist and hand radiographs for the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Digit Imaging 11, 116 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168734
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168734