Skip to main content
Log in

On the developmental morphology of androgynous receptacles inMarchantia palmata nees

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

Summary

  1. 1.

    Marchantia palmata which grows commonly at Ootacamund on the Nilgiris forms plenty of androgynous receptacles.

  2. 2.

    These receptacles start as purely female receptacles, but soon one or more proliferations bearing antheridia grow out from its under surface.

  3. 3.

    These proliferations are merely the archegonia-bearing lobes of the female receptacle which become active again and continue to grow further into narrow elongated outgrowths.

  4. 4.

    The proliferations produce at first sexual structures which are intermediate between an archegonium and an antheridium and later on typical antheridia. A consideration of these intermediate structures suggests that antheridia and archegonia are homologous structures.

  5. 5.

    A fungus forming pycnidia is generally present in the liverwort. It could not be dicided whether the change of sex in the receptacle is due to this fungal attack.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Campbell, D. H. “Studies on some East Indian Hepaticæ,”Ann. Bot., 1918,32, 319–38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chopra, R. S. “Notes on Indian Hepaticæ, I. S. India,”Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1938,7, No. 5, 243.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cutting, E. M. “On Androgynous Receptacles inMarchantia,”Ann. Bot., 1910,24, 349–57.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, B. M. “The origin of the archegonium,”ibid.,, 1903,17 477–92.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ernst, A. “Untersuchungen uber Entwicklung Bau und Verteilung der Infloreszenzen vonDumortiera,”Ann. Du. Jard. Bot. de Buitenzorg, ii, S. 1908,22, 153–223.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goebel, K. “Uber die Verzweigung dorsiventraler Sprosse,”Arb. des. Bot. Instit. in Wurzburg, 1880, Bd.2, Heft 3, 353 (from Cutting).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haupt, A. W. “Morphology ofPreissia quadrata,”Bot. Gaz., 1926,82, 30–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haupt, G. “Beitrage zur Zytologie der GattungMarchantia (L.),”Zeits. fur. Ind. Abs. und Vereb., 1933, Bd.63, 390–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heberlein, E. A. “Morphological studies on a new species ofMarchantia,”Bot. Gaz., 1929,88, 427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holferty, G. M. “The archegonium ofMnium cuspidatum,”ibid.,, 1904,37, 106–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kashyap, S. R.Liverworts of the Western Himalayas and the Panjab Plains, Pt. I, Lahore, 1929.

  12. Leitgeb, H.Untersuchungen uber die Lebermoose Graz., 1874–82.vi. Die Marchantiaceen, 1881.

  13. O’Hanlon, M. E. “A study ofPreissia quadrata,”Bot. Gaz., 1927,84, 208–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor, Th. “De Marchantieis,”Trans. Linn. Soc., 1834,17, 375 (from Cutting).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. — Mackay’sFlora Hiberniae, 1836,2, 54 (from Cutting).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Townsend, A. “An hermaphrodite gametophore inPreissia commutata,”Bot. Gaz., 1899,28, 360–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by Dr. M. O. P. Iyengar,m.a., ph.d. (Lond.),f.l.s.

From the University Botany Laboratory, Madras. This paper formed part of a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Master of Science of the University of Madras. It was read before the Annual Meeting of the Indian Academy of Sciences at Madras on 20th December 1938.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srinivasan, K.S. On the developmental morphology of androgynous receptacles inMarchantia palmata nees. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 10, 88–97 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03047665

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03047665

Keywords

Navigation