Abstract
Social and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (SELCA) is an analytical tool for profiling and evaluating the interaction between the social and technological systems within the life cycle of given service. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (ELCA) and Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA) are undertaken with their own objectives using independent methodologies. Integrating the outcomes of the two assessments provides more comprehensive and insightful descriptions of the potential impacts of a life cycle, including the key social factors through which the life cycle is sustained and modified. The SELCA approach is outlined using the examples of two fuel cycles of coal and waste in energy-generation. There are some methodological issues in combining ELCA and SLCA which we highlight in order to encourage further work on the integration of environmental and social processes in LCA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clift, R. &Longley, AJ. (1995): Clean Technology: An Introduction, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 62:321–26
Doig, A.,Ellison, J. &O’Brien, M. (1994): Combining Social Science and Environmental Data in the Development of Life Cycle Assessment. Presentation to SETAC Conference on LCA Case Studies. Brussels, December
Doig, A. &Ellison, J. (1995): Validating and Completing the Model: Integrating Social Science Data Collection Methods and Life Cycle Assessment. 5th SETAC-Europe Conference, Copenhagen, June
O’Brien, M.,Clift, R. &Doig, A. (1996a): Social and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment: Report of a Study. Guildford, The University of Surrey
O’Brien, M.,Clift, R. &Doig, A. (1996b): Social and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice. Guildford, The University of Surrey
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Brien, M., Doig, A. & Clift, R. Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA). Int. J. LCA 1, 231–237 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978703
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978703