Abstract
Data show that spatial orientation in microgravity differs from that on Earth possibly facilitating space motion sickness and degrading performance. As a technology demonstration, we developed a Tactile Orientation Awareness Support Tool (TOAST) consisting of a vest with 56 vibrators. TOAST presents an artificial gravity vector by a localised vibration on the torso that points in the direction of down. Here, we report on the operational issues of TOAST. In an experiment with a single male austronaut, we tested if he could detect the vibrations in mircogravity as fast as on Earth. We used several questionnaires to investigate issues such as comfort and usability. The results show that, on average, the astronaut responds faster in microgravity than on Earth. However, the data also showed that the fit of the vest could be improved. The questionnaires show that the tool supported the astronaut in orientation tasks and has potential in challenging situations, but is not needed during daily operations. Although the comfort of the vest is OK, the somewhat bulky equipment of the demonstrator reduced its wearibility. We conclude that the demonstration was successful but that more microgravity data are needed to corroborate the findings. We expect a spin- off to applications for pilots, divers, individuals with a visual or vestibular dysfunction, emergency services, and the automobile and sports industry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zupan, L.H., Merfeld, D.M. & Darlot, C.: Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements. Biol Cybern. 86 (3), 209–230 (2002).
Dichgans, J. & Diener, H.C.: The contribution of vestibulo-spinal mechanisms to the maintenance of human upright posture. Acta Otolaryngol. 107(5–6), 338–345(1989).
Glasauer, S. & Mittelsteadt H.: Perception of spatial orientation in microgravity. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 28 (1–2), 185–193 (1998).
Lackner, J.R.: Spatial orientation in weightless environments. Perception 21 (6), 803–812 (1992).
Young, L.R. &Shelhamer, M.: Weightlessness enhances the relative contribution of visually-induced motion sensation. Aviat Space Environ Med. 61 (6), 525–530 (1990).
Kornilova, L.N.: Orientation illusions in spaceflight. J Vestib Res. 7 (6), 429–439 (1997).
Graybiel, A., & Kellogg, R.S.: The inversion illusion and its probable dependence on otolith function. Aerosp Med. 38, 1099–1103 (1967).
The National Academy of Sciences: Chapter 5, Sensorymotor Integration. In: A strategy for research in space biology and medicine into the next century, pp 63–66. (1988).
Carriot, J., Bringoux, L., Charles, C., Mars, F., Nougier, V. & Cian, C.: Perceived body orientation in microgravity: effects of prior experience and pressure under the feet. Aviat Space Environ Med. 75 (9), 795–799 (2004).
Van Erp, J.B.F.: Presenting Directions with a Vibro-Tactile Torso Display. Ergonomics, 48, 302–313. (2005).
Van Erp, J.B.F., van Veen, H.A.H.C., Jansen, C. & Dobbins, T.: Waypoint Navigation with a Vibrotactile Waist Belt. Transactions on Applied Perception, 2 (2), 106–117. (2005).
Van Erp, J.B.F., Groen, E.L., Bos, J.E. & Van Veen, H.A.H.C.: A Tactile Cockpit Instrument Supports the Control of Self-Motion During Spatial Disorientation. Human Factors, 48 (2), 219–228. (2006).
Van Erp, J.B.F., Van Veen, H.A.H.C.: Touch down: the effect of artificial touch cues on orientation in microgravity. NeuroScience Letters, 404, 78–82. (2006).
Tan, H., Lim, A & Traylor, R.: A psychophysical study of sensory saltation with an open response paradigm. In S.S. Nair (ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. American Society of Mechanical engineers Dynamic Systems and Control Division, 69 (2), 1109–1115. (2000).
Traylor, R. & Tan, H.: Development of a wearable Haptic Display for Situation Awareness in Altered-gravity Environment: Some Initial Findings. Proceedings of the 1 0th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. IEEE Computer Society. (2002).
Van Erp, J.B.F. & Van Veen, H.A.H.C.: Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system. Transportation Research part F: Human Factors, 7, 247–256. (2004).
Eriksson, L., Van Erp, J.B.F., Carlander, O., Levin, B., Van Veen, H.A.H.C. & Veltman, J.E.: Vibrotactile and visual threat cueing with high g threat intercept in dynamic flight simulation. HFES 50th annual meeting. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. (2006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Erp Jan, B.F., van Veen Hendrik, A.H.C. & Mark, R. More than a feeling: bringing touch into astronauts’ spatial orientation. Microgravity Sci. Technol 19, 108–112 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02919463
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02919463