Skip to main content
Log in

Prehistoric sunflower (Helianthus Annuus L.) domestication in Mexico

Domesticación Prehistórica del Glrasol (helianthus Annuus L.) en México

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early remains of Helianthus annuus L. unearthed at the San Andrés site in the Gulf Coast region of Tabasco, Mexico, constitute the earliest record of domesticated sunflower. Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) age determinations of a large domesticated seed and achene produced dates of 4130 ± 40 years before the present (B.P.) and 4085 ± 50 B.P., respectively. These discoveries challenge the longstanding hypothesis that sunflower was domesticated in eastern North America. Moreover, when considered with other recent discoveries on plant domestication, these data suggest a reconsideration of the idea that the eastern United States was an independent hearth for domestication.

Resumen

Los registros más antiguos del girasol lo constituyen los primeror restos deHelianthus annuus L. desenter-rados en el sitio de San Andrés, Tabasco, en la costa del Golfo de México. Mediante el acelerador de espectrometría de masas se determinó la edad de una semilla grande domesticada y un aquenio se obtuvieron dos fechas de 4130 ± 40 años antes del presente (A.P.) y 4085 ± 50 A.P., respectivamente. Estos descubrimientos ponen en duda la hipótesis de hace tiempo que dice que el girasol fue domesticado en el este de None América. También, cuando se tomaron en cuenta otros descubrimientos sobre domesticatión de plantas, estos datos suguieren una reconsideratión de la idea que el este de los Estados Unidos fue un centro independiente de domesticatión.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Arias, D. M., and L. H. Rieseberg. 1995. Genetic relationships among domesticated and wild sunflowers (Helianthus annuus, Asteraceae). Economic Botany 49:239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, D. L., and N. B. Ash. 1985. Prehistoric plant cultivation in west-central Illinois. Pages 149–203in R. I. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Paper No. 75. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, A. J. 1973. Analysis of floral remains from the Higgs site (40L045). Pages 141–144in M. C. R. McCullough and C. J. Faulknor, eds., Excavation of the Higgs and Doughty Site. 1-75 Salvage Archaeology. Tennessee Archaeological Society, Miscellaneous Papers No. 12, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callen, E. O. 1969. Diet as revealed by coprolites. Pages 235–243in D. Brothwell and E. Higgs, eds., Science in archaeology, 2nd ed. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, C. W. 1978. The prehistoric use and distribution of maygrass in eastern North America: cultural and phytogeographical implications. Pages 263–288in R. I. Ford, ed., The nature and status of ethnobotany. Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Paper No. 67, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crites, G. D. 1993. Domesticated sunflower in fifth millenium B.P. temporal context: New evidence from Middle Tennessee. American Antiquity 58 (1):146–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronn, R., M. Brothers, K. Klier, P. K. Bretting, and J. F. Wendel. 1997. Allozyme variation in domesticated annual sunflower and its wild relatives. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95(4):532- 545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doebley, J. 1990. Molecular evidence and the evolution of maize. Economic Botany 44(3 Supplement): 6–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, G. 1997. A three-thousand-year-old cache of crop seeds from Marble Bluff, Arkansas. Pages 42–62in K. J. Gremillion, ed., People, plants, and landscapes: studies in paleoethnobotany. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C. B. 1951. The sunflower among the North American Indians. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 95(4):432–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. Variation and subspeciation in the common sunflowerHelianthus annuus. American Midland Naturalist 51:287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985. Some botanical considerations of the early domesticated plants north of Mexico. Pages 149–203in R. I. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Paper No. 75, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. The domesticated sunflower in old Mexico? Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 45:447–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, F. 1942. Historia de las plantas de Nueva Espana 1. Imprenta Universitaria, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun, S., A. Gopher, and S. Abbo. 2000. The cradle of agriculture. Science 288:1602–1603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miksicek, C. H. 1986. Paleobotanical identifications, Appendix 2. Pages 199–200in A. A. Demarest, ed., The archaeology of Santa Leticia and the rise of Maya civilization. Middle American Research Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Sunflower Association. Sunflower seed pro-duction[online]. Available: http//www.sunflowersnsa. com/producers/mark-stats/world-snd.html (1999, August 13).

  • Ramirez Celestino, C. 1991. Plantas de la regíon Ná-huatl del centro de Guerrero. Centro de Investiga-ciones y Estudias Superiores en Antropología Social, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg, L. H., and G. J. Seiler. 1990. Molecular evidence and the origin and development of the domesticated sunflower (Helianthus annuus, Aster-aceae). Economic Botany 44(3 Supplement):79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. E., T. T. Thompson, and G. J. Seiler. 1982. Sunflower Species of the United States. National Sunflower Association, Bismarck, ND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, W. F., and R. J. Sharer. 1988. Olmec settlement data from La Venta, Tabasco, Mexico. Science 242:102–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. D. 1992a. Rivers of change. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992b. Prehistoric plant husbandry in eastern North America. Pages 101–119in C. W. Cowan and P. J. Watson, eds., The origins of agriculture: an international perspective. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. The initial domestication ofCucurbita pepo in the Americas 10,000 years ago. Science 276:932.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. Emergence of agriculture. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L. n.d. The comps of Mexico: a systematic account of the family Asteraceae, Heliantheae. Phytologia Memoirs Nos. 10–11, Huntsville, TX.

  • Wilson, H. D. 1990.Quinua and relatives (Chenopo-dium sect.Chenopodium subsect.cellulata). Econ-onic Botany 44(3 Supplement):92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarnell, R. 1978. Domestication of sunflower and sumpweed in eastern North America. Pages 289–299in R. I. Ford, ed., The nature and status of ethnobotany. Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers No. 67, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary, D. 1996. The founder crops of southwest Asian agriculture. Pages 142–158in D. R. Harris, ed., The origins and spread of agriculture and pas-toralism in Eurasia. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lentz, D.L., Pohl, M.E.D., Pope, K.O. et al. Prehistoric sunflower (Helianthus Annuus L.) domestication in Mexico. Econ Bot 55, 370–376 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866560

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866560

Key Words

Navigation