Skip to main content
Log in

Special report

Standing on all three legs: The técnico as a cross-cultural occupational group

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature cited

  • Bentley, J., and G. Rodríguez. 2001. Honduran folk entomology. Current Anthropology, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. 1980. The small farmer is a professional. Ceres 13(2):19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, R. F. 1993. The cultural relations of classification: an analysis of nuaulu animal categories from central Seram. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunn, E. 1982. The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. American Anthropologist 84:830–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naipaul, V. S. 1990. India: a million mutinies now. Minerva, London. 520 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla A., M. 1999. El cultivo del duraznero en los valles Cruceños. CIAT, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. 55 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Eric Boa, Jeffery W. Bentley or John Stonehouse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boa, E., Bentley, J.W. & Stonehouse, J. Special report. Econ Bot 55, 363–369 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866559

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866559

Keywords

Navigation