Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The proper designation of the vascular plants

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • André, H. 1938. Die Polarität der Pflanze als Schlüssel zur Lösung des Generationswechselproblems.

  • Arber, Agnes. 1941. The interpretation of leaf and root in the angiosperms. Biol. Rev.16: 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arber, E. A. N. 1921. Devonian floras, a study of the origin of Cormophyta.

  • Berry, E. W. 1920. Paleobotany: a sketch of the origin and evolution of floras. Smithson. Inst., Ann. Rep.1918: 289–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessey, C. E. 1914. Revisions of some plant phyla. Univ. Stud. Lincoln, Nebraska14(1): 73 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, F. O. 1930. Size and form in plants with special reference to the primary conducting tracts.

  • -. 1935. Primitive land plants also known as the Archegoniatae.

  • Briquet, J. 1935. International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature. 3. ed.

  • Browne, Isabel M. P. 1935. Some views on the morphology and phylogeny of the leafy vascular sporophyte. Bot. Rev.1: 383–404, 427–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugnon, P. 1922. L’origine phylogénique des plantes vasculaires d’après Lignier et la nouvelle classe des Psilophytales. Bull. Soc. Linnéenne Normandie, VII,4(1921): 196–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. H. 1940. The evolution of the land plants (Embryophyta).

  • Cappelletti, C. 1936. Morfologia.In Gola, G., Negri, G. and C. Cappelletti, Trattato di Botanica.

  • Clements, F. E. 1902. A system of nomenclature for phytogeography. Beibl. (70) Bot. Jahrb.31(4/5): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, F. 1872. Conspectus familiarum cryptogamarum secundum methodum naturalem dispositarum. Hedwigia11(2): 17–20. [See Rep. ann. lit. bot. per. 1: 95, 1872 for additional references of publication elsewhere.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Conard, H. S. 1919. The classification of vascular plants: a review. Plant World22(3): 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrah, W. C. 1939. Textbook of paleobotany.

  • -. 1942. An introduction to the plant sciences.

  • DeCandolle, A. P. 1805–1815. See under Lemarck.

  • -. 1818. Regni vegetabilis systerna naturale, etc. Vol. 1.

  • —. 1833. Note sur la division du règne végétal en quatre grandes classes ou embranchemens. Bibl. Univ. Genève54: 259–268. See also Schlechtendal, F. L. von. 1836. Linnaea10(3): 270–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, A. J. 1936. Morphology of vascular plants, lower groups (Psilophytales to Filicales).

  • - andL. H. MacDaniels. 1925. An introduction to plant anatomy.

  • Endlicher, S. 1836–1840. Genera plantaram secundum ordines naturales disposita.

  • Engler, A. andL. Diels. 1936. Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. 11. ed.

  • Foster, A. S. 1942. Practical plant anatomy.

  • Fritsch, F. E. 1935. The structure and reproduction of the algae. Vol.1.

  • Gmelin, P. 1867. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien nach ihren gegenseitigen Verwandschaften.

  • Gravis, A. 1922. Gamétophore et sporophore. Arch. Inst. Bot. Univ. Liége 6: 6 pp.

  • Haeckel, E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Vol.2.

  • -. 1894. Systematische Phylogenie. I. Teil. Systematische Phylogenie der Protisten und Pflanzen.

  • Hallier, H. 1905. Provisional scheme of the natural (phylogenetic) system of flowering plants. New Phytol.4: 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harder, R. 1939. Gliederung des Pflanzenreichs.In Strasburger’s Lehrbuch der Botanik. 20. ed.

  • Hofmann, E. 1934. Paläohistologie der Pflanze.

  • Jeffrey, E. C. 1917. The anatomy of woody plants.

  • Kousnetzow, N. J. 1922. Les principes, les méthodes contemporains et les problèmes futurs du système phylogénétique naturel des plantes Angiospermes. Bull. Jard. Bot. Republ. Russe21(3): 182–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lamarck et De Candolle. 1805–1815. Flore Française, etc. 3. ed. Vol. 1.

  • Lotsy, J. P. 1909. Vorträge über botanische Stammesgeschichte, 2: Cormophyta Zoidogamia.

  • MacDougall, Mary S. andR. Hegner. 1943. Biology the science of life.

  • MacMillan, C. 1892. The Metaspermae of the Minnesota Valley. Geol. & Nat. Hist. Survey Minn., Bot. I.

  • —. 1892. Suggestions on the classification of Metaphyta. Bot. Gaz.17: 108–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J. W. 1934. Phytography as a fine art.

  • Mortier, M. B. du. 1864. Discours sur la marche de la classification générale des plantes, depuis Jussieu jusqu’a nos jours. Fasc, viiin Opuscules de Botanique (1862-1873).

  • Nilsson, H. 1941. Die Homologie des angiospermen Embryosacks. Bot. Not.1941(1): 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascher, A. 1931. Systematische Übersicht über die mit Flagellaten in Zusammenhang stehenden Algenreihen und Versuch einer Einreihung dieser Algenstämme in die Stämme des Pflanzenreiches. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 2. Abt.48: 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pia, J. 1931. Review of W. Zimmermann, Die Phylogenie der Pflanzen, Jena, 1930in Mitt. Geol. Ges. Wien23(1930): 164–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincher, H. C. 1935. A genetical interpretation of the origin of heterospory and related conditions. New Phytol.34: 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1937. A genetical interpretation of alternation of generations. New Phytol.36(2): 179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, K. 1921. Die Entwicklung der Stammbildung bei den fossilen Pflanzen. Lotos (Prague)69: 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakisaka, M. andY. Sinoto. 1930. Critical considerations on the phylogenetic system of classification of plants. I. On the diagnostic characters of phylum and subphylum (P.N.). Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)44: 285–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, J. H. 1928. The general course of evolution in the pjant kingdom. Studies in Determinate Evolution, I. Ohio Jour. Sci.28(6): 277–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1931a. Long-continued determinative orthogenetic series. Studies in Determinate Evolution, IV. Ohio Jour. Sci.31(1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1931b. Principles of plant taxonomy. X. Ohio Jour. Sci.31(2): 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1934. Phylogenetic taxonomy of plants. Quart. Rev. Biol.9(2): 129–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffner, V. 1926. Die Existenzgründe der Zellbildung und Zellteilung, der Vererbung und Sexualität.

  • Schlechtendal, F. L. von. 1836. Bemerkung über die Eintheilung des Gewächsreichs in vier grosse Klassen oder Verzweigungen von A. P. De Candolle. Linnaea10(3): 270–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopf, J. M. 1943. The embryology ofLarix. Ill. Biol. Monogr.19(4).

  • Schoute, J. C. 1902. Die Stelär-Theorie.

  • —. 1926. On the foliar origin of the internal stelar structure of the Marattiaceae. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl.23: 269–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1931. On Phytonism. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl.28: 82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1938. Anatomy.In Frans Verdoorn, Manual of Pteridology.

  • Sinnott, E. W. 1935. Botany. Principles and problems. 3. ed.

  • Smith, G. M. 1938. Cryptogamic botany. 2 vols.

  • Stefanoff, B. 1937. Über die parallelen Beziehungen in der Entwicklung des Leitungs-und des Blattsystems unter Berücksichtigung der ökologischen Entwicklung der Landvegetation. Rep. Spec. Nov. Regn. Veg. Beih. 94.

  • Stolley, E. 1925. Die Psilophyten. 18. Jahresber. Niedersächs. Geol. Ver. Hannover: 39–96.

  • Tippo, O. 1941. A modern classification of the plant kingdom.In Harry J. Fuller, The plant world, pp. 556–558.

  • —. 1942. A modern classification of the plant kingdom. Chron. Bot.7(5): 203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrey, R. E. 1932. General botany for colleges.

  • Troll, W. 1937. Vergleichende Morphologie der Höheren Pflanzen. Vol. 1, pt. 1.

  • Turrill, W. W. 1942. Taxonomy and phylogeny. Bot. Rev.8: 247–270, 473–532, 655–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncer, F. 1838. Aphorismen zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Pflanzen. van Tieghem, Ph. 1906. Eléments de botanique. 2 vols. 4. ed.

  • Wardlaw, C. W. 1944. Experimental and analytical studies of pteridophytes. III. Stelar morphology: the initial differentiation of vascular tissue. Ann. Bot.8(30/31): 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, E. V. 1943. The dynamic approach to plant structure and its relation to modern taxonomic botany. Biol. Rev.18(2): 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetmore, R. H. 1943. Leaf-stem relationships in the vascular plants. Torreya43: 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, R. 1935. Handbuch der systematischen Botanik. 4. ed.

  • Willkomm, M. 1854. Anleitung zum Studium der wissenschaftlichen Botanik, etc.

  • Winckler, E. 1854. Geschichte der Botanik.

  • Zimmermann, W. 1930. Die Phylogenie der Pflanzen.

  • -. 1938. Phylogenie.In Frans Verdoorn, Manual of Pteridology.

  • Zunck, H. L. 1840. Die natürlichen Pflanzensysteme geschichtlich entwickelt.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Notre Dame, USA

    Theodor Just

Authors
  1. Theodor Just
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Just, T. The proper designation of the vascular plants. Bot. Rev 11, 299–309 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861197

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861197

Keywords

Search

Navigation