Skip to main content
Log in

Field comparisons of colloidal phosphate and superphosphate as sources of phosphorus in potato fertilizers

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Superphosphate, triple superphosphate, and mono-ammonium phosphate (Ammo-Phos) are the main sources used to supply phosphorus in potato fertilizers. As is generally recognized, growing potato plants require relatively large amounts of readily available plant nutrients. Although the amount of phosphorus absorbed is only about one-eighth to one-fourth of the amount of nitrogen and potash absorbed, the source of phosphorus must also be readily available to meet the needs of the potato plant for this essential plant nutrient. For a number of years a material designated Colloidal or Waste-pond Phosphate has been on the fertilizer market; at least it has been offered for sale to farmers who use fertilizer for crop production purposes. Potato farmers have been solicited to purchase the material on the strength of statements that its phosphorus is available and that, moreover, it has additional merit because of its content of certain so-called minor or secondary nutrient elements.

Field studies have been made in Maine, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Virginia to compare Colloidal Phosphate and superphosphate as sources of phosphorus in potato fertilizers, the results of which have shown:

  1. 1.

    In all field comparisons,—a total of 13 having been made,—potato plants receiving fertilizer mixture formulated with superphosphate produced greater yields than those receiving the fertilizer mixtures which had Colloidal Phosphate as the source of phosphorus. In Maine, the average increase for 8 tests was 68 bushels per acre in favor of superphosphate; in New Jersey, 1 test, 27 bushels per acre; in Pennsylvania, average of 2 tests, 24.5 bushels per acre; and in Virginia, average of 2 tests, 64 bushels per acre.

  2. 2.

    The more favorable influence of the superphosphate fertilizers on earlier emergence, vine development, tuber set, and number of marketable tubers produced was pronounced.

  3. 3.

    The results reported herein afford a pattern showing (1) that the use of Colloidal Phosphate as a source of phosphorus in potato fertilizers is not justifiable, and (2) that the maintenance of normal vine growth and maximum potato yields requires the use of a material high in available phosphorus as the source of phosphorus in potato fertilizers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. “ Potato yields and quality”, Mont. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. No. 392, 20 pp., 1941.

  2. White-Stevens, R. H.. Effect of different sources of phosphorus on the production of potatoes of Long Island. Amer. Potato Jour.19 (5): 81–90. 1942).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Cooperative investigations with the Maine, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Stations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, B.E., Chucka, J.A., Hawkins, A. et al. Field comparisons of colloidal phosphate and superphosphate as sources of phosphorus in potato fertilizers. American Potato Journal 21, 241–249 (1944). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855899

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855899

Keywords

Navigation