Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of a simple potato growth model in the North Central United States

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple potato growth model was validated in 1985 and 1986 at two dryland sites, Grand Forks, ND and Rosemount, MN, and one irrigated site, Hancock, WI. At each site, Russet Burbank potatoes were grown to maximize yield. Leaf area index and leaf, stem, root, and tuber biomass data were collected from replicated experiments every two weeks. Soil matric potentials, minimum and maximum temperatures, and solar radiation also were measured. Among sites, crop development rates and solar radiation receipts were similar, but final tuber yields differed by as much as 35 Mg/ha. Model predictions of leaf, stem, and tuber dry weights were similar to observed data both in terms of maximum values attained and seasonal development except for the experiment in Grand Forks in 1986 where the model over-estimated final tuber yield by 23 Mg/ha (115%). Soil aeration or salinity, factors not currently modeled, may account for this discrepancy. Modeled yield responses to defoliation were compared with field data from one of the experimental locations. At levels of defoliation below fifty percent, proportional yield reductions were similar between observed and modeled crops.

Compendio

En 1985 y 1986, se validó un modelo simple de crecimiento de la papa en dos localidades de tierras sin riego, Grand Forks, ND, y Rosemount, MN, y una localidad irrigada, Hancock, WI. En cada localidad se sembró papa del cultivar Russet Burbank, para maximizar el rendimiento. Cada dos semanas, se recolectó de experimentos repetidos, información sobre el indice de área de hoja, y sobre la biomasa de hoja, talle y raíz. Se midieron también los potenciales considerados de suelo, las temperaturas mínima y máxima, y la radiación solar. Las tasas de desarrollo del cultivo entre las localidades y las radiaciones solares interceptadas fueron similares, pero los rendimientos finales en tubérculos difirieron hasta en 35 Mg/ha. Con la excepción de un experimento, los pronósticos del modelo para los pesos secos de hojas, tallos, y tubérculos fueron similares a los datos observados, tanto en términos de valores máximos logrados como en lo concerniente al desarrollo estacional. Sin embargo, para Grand Forks, en 1986, el modelo sobre estimó el rendimiento final en tubérculos en aproximadamente 23 Mg/ha (115%). La aereación del suelo o su salinidad —factores no considerados en el modelo—pueden ser la causa de esta diferencia. Las respuestas de los rendimientos a la defoliación fueron comparadas con los datos de campo de una de las localidades experimentales. Una concordancia razonable fue observada entre los rendimientos de campo y los pronosticados bajo niveles similares de defoliación.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Allen, R.J. and R.K. Scott. 1980. An analysis of growth of the potato crop. J Agric Sci (Camb.) 94: 583–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cary, J.W. 1985. Potato tubers and soil aeration. Agron J 77: 379–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Corbett, E.G. and H.W. Gausman. 1960. The interactions of chloride with sulfate and phosphate on the nutrition of potato plants (Solanum tuberosum). Agron J 52: 94–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunkle, E.C. and F.G. Merkle. 1943. The conductivity of soil extracts in relation to germination and growth of certain plants. Soil Sci Am Proc 9: 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fishman, S., H. Talpaz, R. Winograd, M. Dinar, Y. Arazi, Y. Roseman and S. Varshavski. 1985. A model for simulation of potato growth on the plant community level. Agric Syst 18: 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleming, R.A. and J.A. Bruhn. 1983. The role of mathematical models in plant health management. Pages 368–378 in: Challenging problems in plant health, T. Kommedahl and P. Williams, eds. Am Phytopath Soc., St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fye, R.E., V.R. Reddy and D.N. Baker. 1984. Validation of GOSSYM: Part I. Arizona conditions. Agric Syst 14: 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gandar, P.W. and C.B. Tanner. 1976. Leaf growth, tuber growth, and water potential in potatoes. Crop Sci 16: 534–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnsgard, G.A. 1974. Salt affected problem soils in North Dakota. Ext Bul No. 2; North Dakota State Univ., Fargo.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, K.B., S.B. Johnson and P.S. Teng. 1986. Development of a simple potato growth model for use in crop-pest management. Agric Syst 19: 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, K.B., P.S. Teng and E.B. Radcliffe. 1987. Coupling feeding effects of potato leafhopper,Empoasca fabae, nymphs to a model of potato growth. Environ Entomol 16: 250–258.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, S.B., P.S. Teng, G.W. Bird, E. Grafius, D.C. Nelson and D.I. Rouse. 1985. Analysis of potato production systems and identification of IPM research needs. Final report of the potato task force, NC-166 Technical committee on IPM. Cooperative States Research Service, U.S. Dept. Agric., Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lemmon, H. 1986. COMAX: An expert system for cotton crop management. Science 233: 29–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lesczynski, D.B. and C.B. Tanner. 1976. Seasonal variation of root distribution of irrigated, field-grown Russet Burbank potato. Am Potato J 53: 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Loomis, R.S. and S.S. Adams. 1983. Integrative analyses of host-pathogen relations. Ann Rev Phytopathol 21: 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maas, E.V. and G.J. Hoffman. 1977. Crop salt tolerance: current assessment. J Irrig Drainage Div. ASCE (IR2) 103: 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maianu, A. 1985. Natural conditions of salt accumulations in North Dakota. North Dakota Farm Res 43(6): 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maianu, A. 1985. Saline and sodic soils: genesis and properties of saline and sodic soils, methods of reclamation, and management practices for crop production. Dept Soil Sci, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mishoe, J.W., J.W. Jones, D.P. Swaney and G.G. Wilkerson. 1984. Using crop and pest models for management applications. Agric Syst 15: 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ng, E. and R.S. Loomis. 1984. Simulation of growth and yield of the potato crop. Simulation Series Monographs, Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 147 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rawls, W.J. and D.L. Brakensiek, 1982. Estimating soil water retention from soil properties. J Irrig Drainage Div ASCE (IR2) 108: 166–171.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rouse, D.I. 1983. Plant growth models and plant disease epidemiology. Pages 387–398 in: Challenging problems in plant growth, T. Kommedahl and P. Williams, eds. Am Phytopath Soc, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sands, P.J., C. Hackett and H.A. Nix. 1979. A model of the development and bulking of potatoes. I. Derivation from well-managed field crops. Field Crops Res 2: 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sayre, R.N., M. Nonaka and M.L. Weaver. 1975. French fry quality related to specific gravity and solids content variation among potato strips within the same tuber. Am Potato J 52: 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shields, E.J. and J.A. Wyman. 1984. Effect of defoliation at specific growth stages on potato yields. J Econ Entomol 77: 1194–1199.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stone, N.D., R.N. Coulson, R.E. Frisbie and D.K. Loh. 1986. Expert systems in entomology: Three approaches to problem solving. Bul Entomol Soc Am 32: 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Teng, P.S. 1981. Validation of computer models of plant disease epidemics: A review of philosophy and methodology Z Pflanzen Krankheiten Pflanzenschutz 88: 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This is paper 15,452 of the Scientific Journal Series, Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN 55108.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, K.B., Conlon, R.L., Adams, S.S. et al. Validation of a simple potato growth model in the North Central United States. American Potato Journal 65, 27–44 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855312

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855312

Additional Key Words

Navigation