Skip to main content
Log in

Ecology of two cytotypes ofButomus umbellatus II. Reproduction, growth and biomass production

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generative and vegetative reproduction of diploid and triploidButomus umbellatus L., and growth and biomass production of both cytotypes under two different nutrient levels were compared.

Seedling survival was studied under controlled conditions in a growth chamber; the response of plants to different nutrient conditions was studied in experimental garden.

Both cytotypes do not differ in seed germination and seedling survival. Triploids produce more aboveground and underground biomass, more numerous lateral rhizome buds, and have significantly higher flowering stalks. Low generative reproduction (limited seed production) in triploids is compensated for by more intensive vegetative reproduction. High nutrient level appeared to be stressful for plants of both cytotypes: it limits plant growth and causes plant mortality. Triploids are more viable than diploids in this case, which may be important for their survival under conditions of high trophic level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Baumann E. (1911): Die Vegetation des Untersee (Bodensee).—Arch. Hydrobiol. Planktonk., suppl. 1: 1–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O. (1989): Seedling dynamics and life histories in clonal plants.—Oikos 55: 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger R. (1961): Das Klima der bodennahen Luftschicht.—Braunschweig.

  • Glück H. (1911): Biologische und morphologische Untersuchungen über Wasser- und Sumpfgewächse. III. Die Uferflora.-Jena.

  • Hejný S. (1980): Flora a vegetace dvou letněných rybníků ve středních Čechách (Kala u Hostivic, Bucek u Řevníčova) (Flora and vegetation of two summer-drained fishponds in Central Bohemia (Kala near Hostivice, Bucek near Řevníčov)).—Studie ČSAV 1/80, Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hroudová Z. (1980): Ekologická studie druhůSagittaria sagittifolia L.,Butomus umbellatus L.,Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.)Palla,Oenanthe aquatica (L.)Poir. (Ecological study ofSagittaria sagittifolia L.,Butomus umbellatus L.,Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.)Palla,Oenanthe aquatica (L.)Poir.).—Ms., PhD thesis, Bot. Inst. CSAS, Průhonice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hroudová Z. (1981): Sezónní dynamika porostu obnaženého rybničního dna (Seasonal vegetation dynamics on emerged pond bottom).—Sborn. Jihočes. Muz. Přír. Vědy, 21: 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kik C., Linders Th.E. &Bijlsma R. (1992): The distribution of cytotypes in ecologically contrasting populations of the clonal perennialAgrostis stolonifera.—Evol. Trends in Plants, 6 (2): (93–98).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahulcová A. &Jarolímová V. (1993): Ecology of two cytotypes ofButomus umbellatus. I. Karyology and breeding behaviour.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 28: 385–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin D. A. (1983): Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants.—The Amer. Natur. 122 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohammar G. (1954): Bulbils in the inflorescences ofButomus umbellatus.—Svensk Bot. Tidsskr. 48: 485–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve A. (1961): Biosystematics and classification of apomicts.—Feddes Repert. 63: 136–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothera S. &Davy A.J. (1986): Polyploidy and habitat differentiation inDeschampsia caespitosa.— New Phytol., 102: 449–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor G.W. & Cochran W.G. (1971): Statistical methods.-Ames, Iowa.

  • Sokal R.R. &Rohlf F.J. (1969): Biometry.—Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins G.L. (1971): Chromosomal evolution in higher plants.-London.

  • Šetlík I. (1968): Growth and photosynthetic characteristics of algae.-In:Nečas J. & Lhotský O. [eds.]: Ann. Rep. Algolog. Lab. Třeboň for 1967, pp. 71–140.

  • Véber K. &Zahradník J. (1986): Dočišt'ování vod autotrofními mikroorganismy a vyššími rostlinami (Waste water final treatment by autotrophic microorganisms and macrophyta).—Studie Čsav 24/86, Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez J. (1975): Communities and production ecology ofEleocharis acicularis (L.) R. etSch.-Ms. Diss. (Depon. in Bot. Inst. AS CR Průhonice).

  • de Wet J.M.J. (1980): Origins of polyploids.—In:Lewis W.H. [ed.]: Polyploidy. Biological relevance.—New York et London, p. 3–15.

  • Woodhead T.W. & Kirchner O. (1908):Butomaceae.—In:Kirchner O., Loew E. & Schröter C. [eds.]: Lebensgeschichte der Blütenpflanzen Mitteleuropas, Vol. 1/1, Stuttgart, pp. 648–664.

  • Zákravský P. & Hroudová Z. (1992):Butomus umbellatus L.—pěstování a rozmnožování (Butomus umbellatus L.—cultivation and reproduction).—In: Sborník předn. ze semin. Účelové kultivace vodních a mokřadních rostlin, Třeboň 1992: 31–38.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hroudová, Z., Zákravský, P. Ecology of two cytotypes ofButomus umbellatus II. Reproduction, growth and biomass production. Folia geobot. phytotax. 28, 413–424 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853307

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853307

Keywords

Navigation