Skip to main content
Log in

The floodplain grasslands of the Middle Lena-river. I. General characteristic and ordination

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The middle part of one of the largest rivers of Eurasia, the Lena, stretches for a more than 1500 km; the width of its floodplain varies from 5 to 30 km. This floodplain is covered by islands at various stages of development, which are covered by a mosaic of different successional stages. Forests are the terminal stage of succession. Soils are permafrost, ranging from chernozem to saline and alluvial types. Grassland communities are due mainly to the activity of man. Two major ecological factors are responsible for the differentiation: hydrothermic regime (regulated mainly by the altitude above the river) and by soil salinity. Both direct and indirect gradient analyses are used to demonstrate this relation. Species positions along these gradients are given. Two climatically differentiated parts of the floodplain are distinguished. The first steppe-meadow floodplain is characterized by low soil salinity and a more favourable regime of precipitation; the second (meadow-steppe part) by a very dry and continental climate and strong soil salinization up to true sodum-chloride solontchaks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Akhtjamov M.Ch., Urazmetov R.V. &Rudakov K.M. (1980): Otnošenie vidov rastitelnosti pojmennich lugov Srednego Amura k faktoru uvlažnenija.—Ekologija, 6: 73–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliokin S.A. (1954): Chimičeskij analiz vod suši.—Leningrad, “Nauka”, pp. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtseva E.I. (1981): Solončakovatie luga pojmi Srednej Leni (opit statističeskogo analiza).—Avtoref. diss. kand. biol. nauk, Moskva, MGU, pp. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtseva E.I. &Kononov K.E. (1977): Količestvennij analiz svjazi počv i rastitelnosti solončakovatich lugov pojmi Srednej Leni. I. Ordinacija.—Biol. nauki, 12: 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtseva E.I., Kononov K.E. &Rosenberg G.S. (1978): Statističeskij analiz rastitelnosti solončakovatich lugov pojmi Srednej Leni. 2. Geobotaničeskaja indikacia.—Biol. nauki, 6: 132–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtseva E.I. &Kononov K.E. (1979): Količestvennij analiz svjazi počv i rastitelnosti solončakovatich lugov pojmi Srednej Leni. 3. Klassifikacija.—Biol. nauka, 1: 1–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajander A.K. (1903): Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Vegetation der Alluvionen des nördlichen Eurasiens. 1. Die Alluvionen des unteren Lene-Thales.—Acta Soc. Sci. fenn., 32(1): 1–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Čerepanov S.K. (1981): Sosudistie rastenija SSSR.—Leningrad, “Nauka”, pp. 509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononov K.E. (1966a): Ekologičeskie uslovija na lugach pojmi r. Leni v Jugo-Zapadnoj Jakutii (Vodnij režim pojmennich počv. I.).—Vestn. LGU, ser. geol. i geogr., 2(12): 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononov K.E. (1966b): Ekologičeskie uslovija na lugach pojmi r. Leni Jugo-Zapadnoj Jakutii (Vodnij režim pojmennich počv. II.).—Vestn. LGU, ser. geol. i geogr., 4(24): 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononov K.E. (1971): Pojmennie luga Srednej Leni.—Jakutsk, pp. 126.

  • Kononov K.E. (1977): Summarnoe isparenie s različnich tipov pojmennich lugov Srednej Leni.—Meteorol. i gidrol., 10: 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononov K.E. (1978): O statističeskich metodach sravnenija gidrotermičeskogo režima počv.—Počvovedenie 9: 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononov K.E. (1982): Ekologia lugov pojmi Srednej Leni.—Avtoref. diss. dokt. biol. nauk, Moskva, MGU, pp. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononov K.E., Gogoleva P.A. & Burtseva E.I. (1979): Senokosi i pastbišča Centralnoj Jakutii.—Jakutsk, pp. 160.

  • Konorovskij A.K. (1974): Režim merzlotnich pojmennich počv dolini r. Leni.—Novosibirsk, “Nauka”, pp. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lvovič M.I. (1971): Reki SSSR.—Moskva, “Misl”, pp. 351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirkin B.M., Bublienko A.N. & Rozenberg G.S. (1978): Kompozicionnaja ordinacija: uslovija primenenija i optimizacija techniki.—In: Statističeskie metodi analiza počv, rastitelnosti i ich svjazi, Ufa, 129–135.

  • Mirkin B.M., Kononov K.E., Gogoleva P.A., Burtseva E.I. &Naumova L.G. (1992): The floodplain grasslands of the Middle Lena-river. II. Classification.—Folia Geobot. Phytotax, Praha, 27: 247–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirkin B.M. &Naumova L.G. (1983): Gradientnij analiz rastitelnosti.—Uspechi sovremennoj biologii, 1983, Vol. 95, 2: 304–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirkin B.M. &Shelyag-Sosonko Yu.R. (1984): Classification of meadow vegetation in the USSR. Brief survey of history, current status and perspectives.—Vegetatio, 56: 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirkin B.M., Rozenberg G.S. &Naumova L.G. (1989): Slovar ponjatij i terminov sovremennoj fitocenologii.—Moskva, “Nauka”, pp. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapegin L.M. & Oniščenko L.I. (1982): Ob osobennostjach rastitelnosti lugov pojm Belorusskogo Polesja (po resultatam Kompozicionnoj ordinacii).—In: Statističeskij analiz i matematičeskoe modelirovanie fitocenotičeskich sistem.—Ufa, 95–101.

  • Savvinov D.D. &Kononov K.E. (1981): Teplovoj balans lugovoj rastitelnosti i klimat merzlotnich pojmennich počv.—Novosibirsk, “Nauka”, pp. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šennikov A.P. (1941): Lugovedenie.—Leningrad, Izd. LGU, pp. 512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomacha V.A., Rozenberg G.S., Fedorov N.I. &Shelyag-Sosonko Ju.R. (1981): Analiz pojmennich lugov r. Dnepr s pomoščju ordinacionnich metodov..—Ukr. bot. žurn., 37, 5: 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirkin, B.M., Kononov, K.E., Gogoleva, P.A. et al. The floodplain grasslands of the Middle Lena-river. I. General characteristic and ordination. Folia geobot. phytotax. 27, 225–245 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853016

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853016

Keywords

Navigation