Abstract
Each year millions of Americans become victims of predatory crimes. The way victims respond to these attacks varies from complicance with offenders' requests to physically challenging offenders. In some cases, the physical defense of self and property has lethal consequences for the initial offender. While much is known about felony murder victims and typical homicide offenders, little is known about individuals who fight back against predatory attack by using lethal violence. In this paper, we use data from the Homicides in Chicago, 1965–1995 study to describe the characteristics of defensive homicide offenders and to determine how they compare with felony murder victims and defensive homicide offenders. Our results indicate that defensive homicide offenders are more similar to typical homicide offenders than felony murder victims, and are even more likely to have violent criminal histories and to use firearms than typical homicide offenders. Our results challenge the common perception that individuals who fight back against predatory attack are simply “law-abiding citizens.” We conclude the paper with a discussion of the implications of our study for additional research and police practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, N. H. (1980).Homicide: Perspectives on prevention. New York: Human Sciences Press.
Alvarez, A. (1992). Trends and patterns of justifiable homicide: A comparative analysis.Violence and Victims, 7, 347–356.
Black, Donald (1983). Crime as social control.American Sociological Review, 48, 34–45.
Block, C. R. & Block, R. L. (1991). Beginning with Wolfgang: An agenda for homicide research.Journal of Crime and Justice, 14, 31–70.
Block, C. R., Block, R. L., & Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. (1998).Homicides in Chicago, 1965–1995. 4th ICPSR version. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority [producer], 1998. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1998.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2000). Criminal victimization in the United States, 1999. Washington, DC.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2001). Criminal victimization 2000: Changes 1999–2000 with trends 1993–2000. Washington, DC.
Cook, P. J. (1991). The technology of personal violence. In M. H. Tonry (Ed.),Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 1–71). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cook, P. J. & Ludwig, J. (2000).Gun violence: The real costs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cook, P. J. & Moore, M. H. (1999). Guns, gun control, and homicide: A review of research and public policy. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.),Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 277–296). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
Copes, H., Kerley, K. R., Mason, K. & Van Wyk, J. (2001). Reporting behavior of fraud victims and Black's theory of law: An empirical assessment.Justice Quarterly, 18, 343–363.
Copes, H. & Carroll, A. (2001). Killed in the act: A descriptive analysis of crime-precipitated homicide. Paper presented at the 2001 American can Society of Criminology Annual Meeting. Atlanta, GA.
Drinan, R. F. (1990). The good outweighs the evil. In L. Nisbet (Ed.),The gun control debate (pp. 54–62). Buffalo: Prometheus Books.
Erickson, R. J. & Stenseth, A. (1996). Crimes of convenience.Security Management, 40, 60–64.
Hochstetler, A. & Copes, H. (Forthcoming). Managing fears to commit felony theft. In P. Cromwell (ed.),In their own words: Criminals on crime, 3rd edition. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
Kleck, G. (1988). Crime control through the private use of armed force.Social Problems, 35, 1–22.
Kleck, G. (1990). The relationship between gun ownership levels and rates of violence in the United States. In L. Nisbet (Ed.),The gun control debate (pp. 123–129), Buffalo: Prometheus Books.
Kleck, G. (1991).Point blank: Guns and violence in America. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kleck, G. (1997).Targeting guns: Firearms and their control. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kleck, G. & Gertz, M. (1995). Armed resistance to crime: The prevalence and nature of self-defense with a gun.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 150–187.
McDowall, D. (1995). Firearms and self-defense.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 539, 130–140.
Meadows, R. J. (2001).Understanding violence & victimization (2nd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Miethe, T.D. & Meier R. F. (1994).Crime in its social context: Toward an integrated theory of offenders, victims, and situations. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Polsby, D. D. (1995). Firearms costs, firearms benefits and the limits of knowledge.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 207–220.
Rebovich, Donald & Layne, Jenny. (2000).The national public survey on white collar crime. Morgantown, WV: National White Collar Crime Center.
Wolfgang, M. (1958).Patterns in criminal homicide. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Wright, J. D. & Rossi, P. H. (1986)Armed and considered dangerous: A survey of felons and their firearms. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Zahn, M. D. & McCall, P. L. (1999). Trends and patterns of homicide in the 20th Century United States. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.),Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 9–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Authors' Note: The authors thank editor Dennis Stevens and James Black for their helpful comments on earlier draft of the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kerley, K.R., Copes, H., Hochstetler, A.L. et al. Fighting back: Lethal responses to predatory attacks. J Police Crim Psych 17, 52–64 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802861
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802861