Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization in castings—An overview of relevant computational technologies and future challenges

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The manufacture of defect-free components at low cost and high productivity is as important to the casting industry today as it was 30 years ago. In the past, experience was gained either by using a “trial and error” method or by undertaking expensive experiments. Many “dos” and “don’ts” have evolved in the casting process over a period of time. However, the important ones that come to mind are so fundamental that they challenge the “academic mind” to think all over again. The rules proposed by Professor John Campbell[1] are classic examples. The message is simple: mathematical complexity in computer models needs to go hand in hand with the rules derived from “first principles.” In the field of optimization, a variety of methods have been proposed over a period of years. At the start of optimization study, the foundryman’s first choice is to use simple but well-established methods such as the use of orthogonal arrays for optimal design of process conditions or the famous “inscribed” or Heuvers’ circle method[2] for optimal feeding design. The computer simulation software has been based on a variety of computational methods ranging from geometric reasoning techniques (the famous Chvorinov rule and its variants)[11,13,15,29–31] to solving complex partial differential equations using one of the numerical methods. Optimization methods based on solving partial differential methods was an active area of research in the mid-1990s.[6–10,17] This article reviews a variety of optimization methods including—probably for the first time—geometric reasoning methods. The contribution from various computational methodologies is highlighted with particular emphasis on characterizing “objective functions” and “constraints.” The article also raises some of the challenging issues that the optimization community is facing today for solving casting problems and reports on our recent work on linking geometric reasoning techniques with the finite element method (FEM) and other data mining tools to achieve computationally efficient optimal design of casting processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Campbell: Castings Practice: The Ten Rules of Castings, Butter-worth-Heinemann, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Campbell: Castings, 2nd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Upadhya and A.J. Paul: AFS Trans., 1993, vol. 113, pp. 919–25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.G. Bralla: Design for Manufacturability, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1998, p. 1.20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Lally, L.T. Biegler, and H. Henein: Metall. Trans. B, 1991, vol. 22B, pp. 641–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D.A. Tortorelli, J.A. Tomasko, T.E. Morthland, and J.A. Dantzig: Comput Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 1994, vol. 113 (1–2), pp. 157–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T.E. Morthland, P.E. Byrne, D.A. Tortorelli, and J.A. Dantzig: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1995, vol. 26B, pp. 871–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S.A. Ebrahimi, D.A. Tortorelli, and J.A. Dantzig: Appl. Mathem. Modeling, 1997, vol. 21 (2), pp. 113–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Chen and D.A. Tortorelli: Struct. Optim., 1997, vol. 13 (2–3), pp. 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R.M. McDavid and J.A. Dantzig: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1998, vol. 29B, pp. 679–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Wlodawer: Directional Solidification of Steel Castings, Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1966, pp. 61–86.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Ravi and M.N. Srinivasan: Int. J. Produc. Res., 1995, vol. 33 (12), pp. 3367–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Ravi and M.N. Srinivasan: Int. J. Cast Met. Res., 1996, vol. 9, pp. 1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Tiryakioglu, E. Tiryakioglu, and D.R. Askeland: Int. J. Cast Met. Res., 1997, vol. 9, pp. 259–67.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Tiryakioglu and E. Tiryakioglu: Int. J. Cast Met. Res., 2001, vol. 14, pp. 25–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Tiryakioglu, E. Tiryakioglu, and J. Campbell: Int. J. Cast Met. Res., 2002, vol. 14, pp. 371–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. R.S. Ransing and R.W. Lewis: Int. J. Cast Met. Res., 1997, vol. 9, pp. 269–77.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.S. Ransing, S. Savino, and R.W. Lewis: Int. J. Cast Met. Res., 2005, vol. 18 (2), pp. 109–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Wolf, G. Ehlen, and P.R. Sahm: in Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes—VIII, B.G. Thomas and C. Beckermann, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1998, pp. 975–82.

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. Zabaras, G.Z. Yang, and R. Sampath: in Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes—VIII, B.G. Thomas and C. Beckermann, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1998, pp. 983–90.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D.P.K. Singh, N. Palle, G.D. Mallinson, S.M. Panton, and S. Mahadeva: in Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes—VIII, B.G. Thomas and C. Beckermann, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1998, pp. 999–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.W. Lewis, M.T. Manzari, R.S. Ransing, and D.T. Gethin: Mater. Design, 2000, vol. 21 (4), pp. 381–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J.C. Lin: J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2002, vol. 120 (1–3), pp. 226–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J.C. Lin: Int. J. Adv. Manufacturing Technol., 2003, vol. 21 (8), pp. 612–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R.T. Haftka and R.V. Grandhi: Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng., 1986, vol. 57 (1), pp. 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R.S. Ransing: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea, United Kingdom, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R.S. Ransing, R.W. Lewis, and D.T. Gethin: Int. J. Num. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, 1999, vol. 9 (3), pp. 318–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. R.S. Ransing and R.W. Lewis: in Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes VIII, B.G. Thomas and C. Beckermann, eds., San Diego, CA, 1998, pp. 731–38.

  29. J. Berry, V. Kondic, and G. Martin: Modern Castings, 1959, vol. 36, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  30. R.W. Heine and J.J. Uicker: AFS Trans., 1983, vol. 91, pp. 127–36.

    Google Scholar 

  31. S.J. Neises, J.J. Uicker, and R.W. Heine: AFS Trans., 1987, vol. 95, pp. 25–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. S.C. Luby, J.R. Dixon, and M.K. Simmons: ASME Computer Review, ASME, New York, NY, 1988, pp. 285–92.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R.S. Ransing, M.P. Sood, and W.K.S. Pao: Int. J. Cast Met. Res., 2005, vol. 18 (2), pp. 119–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. R.S. Ransing and M.N. Srinivasan: 10th Annual Convention of IIF, Indian Foundrymen Society, Madras, India, Feb. 1992, pp. 285–91.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R.S. Ransing and R.W. Lewis: Int. J. Cast Met. Res., 1998, vol. 10, pp. 207–19.

    Google Scholar 

  36. M.R. Ransing, R.S. Ransing, and R.W. Lewis: 24th BICTA Conf. on Investment Casting, Cast Metal Federation, Oxford, United Kingdom, June 6–8, 1999, pp. 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  37. R.S. Ransing, M.R. Ransing, and R.W. Lewis: Proc. Data Mining Conf., Rio, Brazil, Dec. 2003, N.F.F. Ebecken, C.A. Brebbia, and A. Zanasi, eds., Wessex Institute of Technology, U.K. 2003, pp. 501–10.

    Google Scholar 

  38. R.S. Ransing, M.R. Ransing, and R.W. Lewis: 11th World Conf. on Investment Casting, Cast Metal Federation, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, May 23–26, 2004, pp. 7:71–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Ransing.

Additional information

This article is based on a presentation made in the John Campbell Symposium on Shape Casting, held during the TMS Annual Meeting, February 13–17, 2005, in San Francisco, CA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ransing, R.S., Sood, M.P. Optimization in castings—An overview of relevant computational technologies and future challenges. Metall Mater Trans B 37, 905–911 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735012

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735012

Keywords

Navigation