Skip to main content
Log in

Economic growth and convergence in Germany

  • Shorter Papers & Comments
  • Published:
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

The empirical analysis gives clear evidence of regional convergence in West Germany: poorer regions tend to grow faster than richer ones. In the period 1957–88, the speed of convergence was around 4 percent per year, implying a halving of the difference between actual and steady-state income every 16 years. While our empirical findings on convergence are of a similar magnitude as found by studies for the US and Europe by Barro and Sala-i-Martin (1991) and Mankiw et al. (1990), they indicate however a somewhat faster speed of adjustment for Germany. Also the pattern of a deceleration of the speed of convergence in recent years is similar to the developments found in these two regions (Barro and Sala-i-Martin 1991).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, R. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries.Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, pp. 407–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R., and X. Sala-i-Martin (1990). Economic Growth and Convergence Across the United States. NBER Working Paper, No. 3419. Cambridge, Mass.

  • — (1991). Convergence Across States and Regions.Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1, pp. 107–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. (1986). Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show.American Economic Review, Vol. 76, pp. 1072–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft (1993).Jahreswirtschaftsbericht 1993. Bonn.

  • Chirinko, R.S. (1993). Business Fixed Investment Spending: A Critical Survey of Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Working Paper, No. 93-301, Kansas City.

  • De Long, J.B. (1988). Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: Comment.American Economic Review, Vol. 78, pp. 1138–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowrick, S., and D.-T. Nguyen (1989). OECD Comparative Economic Growth 150–85; Catch-Up and Convergence.American Economic Review, Vol. 79, pp. 1010–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S.N., and P. Johnson (1991). Local versus Global Convergence across National Economies. Center for Economic Policy Research Working Paper, No. 269, London.

  • Funke, M., A. Rüll, and D. Willenbockel (1989). Taxation and Capital Formation in West German Industries: A Q-Theory Approach. In: M. Funke (ed.),Factors in Business Investment. Berlin: Springer, pp. 76–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, F. (1982). Tobin's Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation.Econometrica, Vol. 50, pp. 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuyama, K. (1987). Current Account Dynamics in a Finite Horizon Model.Journal of International Economics, Vol. 23, pp. 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N.G., D. Romer, and D.N. Weil (1980). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper, No. 3541, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Sala-i-Martin X. (1990). Lecture Notes on Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper, No. 3563, Cambridge, Mass.

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Herz, B., Roger, W. Economic growth and convergence in Germany. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 131, 132–143 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02709075

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02709075

Keywords

Navigation