Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of habitat fragmentation on meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) population dynamics in experiment landscape patches

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the effects of habitat fragmentation on meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) population dynamics in experimental landscape patches. The study was conducted from May–November 1993 at the Miami University Ecology Research Center. Eight 0.1-ha small mammal enclosures were used. Four enclosures contained a 160 m2 nonfragmented patch and four enclosures contained four 40 m2 fragmented patches. Thus, each treatment was replicated 4 times in a systematic research design. The patches in both treatments contained high-quality habitat surrounded by low-quality matrix. Six pairs of adult meadow voles were released in each enclosure on 27 May 1993. Populations were monitored by live-trapping and radio-telemetry methods. Significantly greater densities of female voles were found during October in the fragmented treatment compared to the nonfragmented treatment. Also, significantly more females than males were found in the fragmented treatment compared to the nonfragmented treatment for the total study period. Significantly more subadult and juvenile males were found in the matrix versus the patch of the nonfragmented treatment compared to the fragmented treatment. Males in the fragmented treatment had significantly greater mean home range size than males or females in the nonfragmented treatment. There appears to exist a relationship between patch fragmentation and the social structure of meadow vole populations; this relationship appears to function as a population regulatory mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, G.H. and Wilson, M.L. 1989. Demography of the meadow vole along a simple habitat gradient. Can. J. Zool. 67: 772–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, G.W. 1988. Effects of Sevin on small mammal populations in agricultural and old-field ecosystems. J. Mammal. 69: 170–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, G.W. and Peles, J.D. 1995. Optimizing habitat fragmentation: an agrolandscape perspective.In Landscape and Urban Planning. Edited by J.E. Rodiek. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, G.W., Peles, J.D. and Harper, S.J. 1995. Reflections on the use of experimental landscapes in mammalian ecology.In Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology. pp. 157–174. Edited by W.Z. Lidicker, Jr. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batzli, G.O. and Cole, R.F. 1979. Nutritional ecology of microtine rodents: digestibility of forage. J. Mammal. 60: 740–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, J.M. and Jodoin, L. 1987. Defining “high quality” food resources of herbivores: the case for meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Oecologia 71: 510–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birney, E.C., Grant, W.E. and Baird, D.D. 1976. Importance of vegetative cover to cycles ofMicrotus populations. Ecology 57: 1043–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra, R. and Rodd, F.H. 1983. Regulation of breeding density inMicrotus pennsylvanicus. J. Anim. Ecol. 52: 757–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, S.R., Lucas, M.F., Mugnano, J.A., Peles, J.D. and Barrett, G.W. 1993. Inheritance of albinism in meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Am. Midl. Nat. 130: 393–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol. 22: 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Arel, Y., Abramsky, Z. and Kotler, B.P. 1992. Patch use by gerbils (Gerbillus allenbyi) in sandy by rocky habitats. J. Mammal. 73: 821–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desy, E.A. and Batzli, G.O. 1989. Effects of food availability and predation on prairie vole demography: a field experiment. Ecology 70: 411–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desy, E.A. and Thompson, C.F. 1983. Effects of supplemental food onMicrotus pennsylvanicus populations in central Illinois. J. Anim. Ecol. 52: 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doonan, T.J. and Slade, N.A. 1995. Effects of supplemental food on population dynamics of cotton rats,Sigmodon hispidus. Ecology 76: 814–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1981. Patches and structural components landscape ecology. BioScience 31: 733–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. and Gaines, M.S. 1991. The effects of a successional habitat mosaic on a small mammal community. Ecology 72: 1358–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S.J.C. and FitzGerald, R.W. 1988. Home-range as a predictor of mating systems inMicrotus. J. Mammal. 69: 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S.J., Bollinger, E.K. and Barrett, G.W. 1993. Effects of habitat patch shape on population dynamics of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). J. Mammal. 74: 1045–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54: 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ims, R.A., Rolstad, J. and Wegge, P. 1993. Predicting space use responses to habitat fragmentation: Can volesMicrotus oeconomus serve as an experimental model system (EMS) for caperciallie grouseTetrao urogallus in Boreal forest? Biol. Conserv. 63: 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kie, J.G., Baldwin, J.A. and Evans, C.J. 1994. Calhome home range analysis program, U.S. Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, Fresno, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, J.B. 1981. Pregnancy blocking in rodents: Adaptive advantage for females. Amer. Nat. 118: 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, X. and Krebs, C.J. 1991. Can changes in female relatedness influence microtine populations dynamics? Oikos 61: 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Polla, V.N. and Barrett, G.W. 1993. Effects of corrider width and presence on the population dynamics of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Landscape Ecology 8: 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth, R.L. and Batzli, G.O. 1984. Food habits of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) in bluegrass and prairie habitats. J. Mammal. 65: 600–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, D.M. 1980. Space use and social structure in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol. 7: 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, D.M., FitzGerald, R.W. and McShea, W.J. 1984. Dynamics of social nesting in overwintering meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus): possible consequences for population cycling. Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol. 15: 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, R.J. and Batzli, G.O. 1989. Influence of chemical factors on palatability of forage to voles. J. Mammal. 70: 503–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGravy, K.W. and Rose, R.K. 1992. An analysis of external features as predictors of reproductive status in small mammals. J. Mammal. 73: 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, C.O. 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American mammals. Amer. Midl. Nat. 37: 223–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E.P. 1960. Organic production and turnover in old-field succession. Ecology 41: 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld, R.S. 1992. Small-mammal herbivores in patchy environment: Individual strategies and population responses.In Effects of Resource Distribution on Animal-Plant Interactions. pp. 43–73. Edited by Hunter, D.M., Ohgushi, T. and Price, R.W. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld, R.S. 1990. The ecology and territoriality in small mammals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 411–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld, R.S., Lidicker, W.Z., Jr. and Heske, E.J. 1988. Space use and reproductive success in a population of meadow voles. J. Anim. Ecol. 57: 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrusewicz, K. and Andrzejewski, R. 1962. Natural history of a free-living population of house mice (Mus musculus Linnaeus), with particular reference to groupings within populations. Ekol. Polska Ser. A 10: 85–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porneluzi, P., Bednarz, J.C., Goodrich, L.G., Zawada, N. and Hoover, J. 1993. Reproductive performance of territorial Ovenbirds occuping forest fragments and a contiguous forest in Pennsylvania. Conserv. Biol. 7: 618–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G.R., Holt, R.D., Gaines, M.S., Hamburg, S.T., Johnson, M.L., Fitch, S.S. and Martinko, E.A. 1992. Diverse and contrasting effects of habitat fragmentation. Science 257: 524–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sera, W.E. and Gaines, M.S. 1994. The effect of relatedness on spacing behavior and fitness of female praire voles. Ecology 75: 1560–1566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, M. and Tamarin, R.H. 1988. Space use, longevity and reproductive success in meadow voles. Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol. 22: 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S.R. and Barrett, G.W. 1980. Effects of acute herbicide stress on the small mammal component of an experimental grassland ecosystem. Am. Midl. Nat. 103: 32–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps, J.A., Buechner, M. and Krishnan, V.V. 1987. The effects of habitat geometry on territorial defense costs: Intruder pressure in bounded habitats. Amer. Zool. 27: 307–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stueck, K.L. and Barrett, G.W. 1978. Effects of resource partitioning on population dynamics and energy utilization strategies of feral house mice (Mus musculus) populations under experimental field conditions. Ecology 59: 539–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szacki, J., Babinska-Weka, J. and Liro, A. 1993. The influence of landscape spatial structure on small mammal movements. Acta Theriologica 38: 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.W., Forsman, E.D., Lint, J.L., Meslow, E.C., Noon, B.R. and Verner, J. 1990. A conservation strategy for the norther spotted owl. Report of the Interagency Scientific Committee to Address the Conservation of the Northern Spotted Owl. Portland, Oregon.

  • Thompson, D.Q. 1965. Food preferences of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) in relation to habitat affinities. Amer. Midl. Nat. 74: 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor, G.D. and Minson, D.J. 1982. The utilization of dietary energy ofPangola andSetaria by young growing beef cattle. J. Agric. Science. 98: 395–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B.N. and Iverson, S.L. 1973. The annual cycle of aggression in maleMicrotus pennsylvanicus, and its relation to population parameters. Ecology 54: 967–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. and Moss, R. 1970. Dominance, spacing behavior and aggression in relation to population limitation in vertebrates.In Animal Populations in Relation to Their Food Resources. pp. 167–218. Edited by A. Watson. Blackwell, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, A.B. and Brooks, R.J. 1981. Social behavior ofMicrotus pennsylvanicus in relation to seasonal changes in demography. J. Mammal. 62: 738–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J.O. 1993. Why are female small mammals territorial? Oikos 68: 364–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Miami University, 45056, Oxford, OH, U.S.A.

    Rachel J. Collins

  2. Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, 30602, Athens, GA, U.S.A.

    Gary W. Barrett

Authors
  1. Rachel J. Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gary W. Barrett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collins, R.J., Barrett, G.W. Effects of habitat fragmentation on meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) population dynamics in experiment landscape patches. Landscape Ecol 12, 63–76 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698208

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698208

Keywords

Search

Navigation