Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tennessee meets the challenge of dyslexia

  • Part II Lessons From The Field
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1993, the Tennessee General Assembly voted funds to establish a model unit of integrated services and research to address the full scope of issues associated with dyslexia. Dyslexia is characterized as significant difficulty in reading and spelling individual words. In the Tennessee Center for the Study and Treatment of Dyslexia, these problems are presumed to be the consequence of a phonological core deficit. When compared to typical readers, matched for age or reading level, dyslexic readers evidence average listening comprehension, a relative strength in reading comprehension, deficits in word recognition and spelling, and severe deficits in word analysis as well as in awareness and manipulation of phonemes. Integration of this information yields a diagnostic profile that may be applied in the differential diagnosis of dyslexia both in clinical and school settings. This paper presents an overview of the Tennessee Center for Dyslexia and the services it provides as well as its guidelines for interpreting the results of norm-referenced tests and criterion-referenced measures to diagnose dyslexia and plan appropriate intervention. Frith’s (1985, 1986) developmental framework for reading acquisition is integrated with the assessment data to outline an instructional plan that addresses mastery of skills within and across the hierarchical phases—logographic, alphabetic, and orthographic—of reading development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaron, P. G. 1991. Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests?Journal of Learning Disabilities 24:178–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaron, P. G. 1995. Differential diagnosis of reading disabilities.School Psychology Review 24:345–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaron, P. G., and Joshi, R. M. 1992.Reading Problems: Consultation and Remediation. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abouzeid, M. P. 1992. Stages of word knowledge in reading disabled children. In S. Templeton and D. Bear (eds.),Development of Orthographic Knowledge and the Foundation of Literacy: A Memorial Festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backman, J., Bruck, M., Herbert, M., and Seidenberg, M. S. 1984. Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38:114–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., and Bryant, P. E. 1983. Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection.Nature 301:419–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. 1988. The word recognition and spelling of dyslexic children.Reading Research Quarterly 23:51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conners, F., and Olson, R. K. 1990. Reading comprehension in dyslexic and normal readers: A component skills analysis. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Areais, and K. Rayner (eds.),Comprehension Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. 1987. Learning to read and spell words.Journal of Reading Behavior 19:5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. 1994. Development of the ability to read words: Update. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, and H. Singer (eds.),Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, Fourth Edition. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkonin, D. B. 1973. U.S.S.R. In J. Downing (ed.),Comparative Reading. New York: MacMillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R., and Francis, D. J. 1994. Exploring connections among reading, spelling, and phonemic segmentation during the first grade.Reading and Writing 6:65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. 1985. Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J. Marshall, and M. Coltheart (eds.),Surface Dyslexia. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. 1986. A developmental framework for developmental dyslexia.Annals of Dyslexia 36:69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganske, K. 1993.Developmental Spelling Analysis. Barboursville, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith-Phillips, J. 1994. Toward a research-based dyslexia assessment. In N. C. Jordan and J. Goldsmith-Phillips (eds.),Learning Disabilities: New Directions for Assessment and Intervention. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E. H. 1990.Teaching Spelling, Second Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, R. M. 1995. Assessing reading and spelling skills.School Psychology Review 24:361–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y. 1973. Segmentation of the spoken word and reading acquisition.Bulletin of The Orton Society. 23:65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindamood, C. H., and Lindamood, P. C. 1979.Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test. Chicago: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., Frost, I., and Peterson, O. 1988. Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children.Reading Research Quarterly 23:263–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R. 1995. Toward a definition of dyslexia.Annals of Dyslexia 45:3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F. R., Custodio, R., and Szeszulski, P. A. 1993. Development of phonological and orthographic skill: A 2-year longitudinal study of dyslexic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 56:64–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. 1993. Spelling error interpretation: Beyond the phonetic/dysphonetic dictionary.Annals of Dyslexia 43:174–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., and Rack, J. P. 1994. Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G.R. Lyon (ed.),Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F. 1991.Diagnosing Learning Disorders: A Neuropsychological Framework. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A. 1992. The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, and R. Treiman (eds.),Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psychological Corporation. 1992.Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. San Antionio, TX: Harcourt Brace and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., and Olson, R.K. 1992. The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review.Reading Research Quarterly 27:28–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, E., and Dibenedetto, B. 1985.Decoding Skills Test. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, D. J. 1992. Language abilities, reading acquisition, and developmental dyslexia: A discussion of hypothetical and observed relationships.Journal of Learning Disabilities 25:82–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, D. J. 1987.Test of Awareness of Language Segments. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A. E., Liberman, A. M., Brady, S. A., Thornton, R., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, S. E., and Shaywitz, B. A. 1995. Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax.Psychological Science 6:149–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. 1989. IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities 22:469–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, C., and French, L. 1990. Identifying children with specific reading disabilities from listening and reading discrepancy scores.Journal of Learning Disabilities 23:53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. 1991. Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray?Reading Research Quarterly 26:7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. and West, R. F. 1989. Exposure to print and orthographic processing.Reading Research Quarterly 24:402–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, S., and Bear, D. R. eds. 1992.Development of Orthographic Knowledge and Foundations of Literacy: A Memorial Festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., and Rashotte, C. A. 1994. Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading.Journal of Learning Disabilities 27:276–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. 1993.Beginning to Spell. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., and Tanzman, M. S. 1994. Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding, and orthographic coding. In G.R. Lyon (ed.),Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K. and Torgesen, J. J. 1987. The nature of phonological processing, and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills.Psychological Bulletin 101:192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. 1987.Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests (rev. ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee

    S. Yancey Padget, Deborah F. Knight & Diane J. Sawyer

Authors
  1. S. Yancey Padget
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deborah F. Knight
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Diane J. Sawyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padget, S.Y., Knight, D.F. & Sawyer, D.J. Tennessee meets the challenge of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia 46, 49–72 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648171

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648171

Keywords

Search

Navigation