Abstract
A comparison of the development of reading ability among adults with that of children—from the lowest levels of literacy to the most advanced. Included in the comparison are characteristics of adults at each level of development, the kind of instruction that will help bring them from lower to higher levels, and the particular difficulties they experience at the various levels. The article concludes with a historical overview of the changes in literacy standards and needs in the United States and the growing recognition that among the adult illiterates, particularly native English speakers who have very limited reading skills, are large numbers who have dyslexia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. D., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., and Wilkinson, I. A. G. 1985.Becoming a Nation of Readers: The report of the commission on reading. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Education.
Bennett, W. 1986.First Lessons. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Carroll, J. B. and Chall, J. S. 1975.Toward a Literate Society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chall, J. S. 1983a.Stages of Reading Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chall, J. S. 1983b. Literacy: Trends and explanations.Educational Researcher 12(9):3–8.
Cross, P. 1981.Adults as Learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Freire, P. 1970.Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
Freire, P. 1974.Education for Critical Consciousness. London: Sheed and Ward.
Freire, P. 1985.The Politics of Education: Culture, power and liberation. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.
Hunter, C. and Harman, D. 1979.Adult Illiteracy in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lerche, R. 1985.Effective Adult Literacy Programs. New York: Cambridge Adult Education Company.
Lorge, I. and Chall, J. S. 1963. Estimating the size of vocabularies of children and adults: An analysis of methodological issues.Journal of Experimental Education 32:147–157.
Mikulecky, L. 1981. The mismatch between school training and job literacy demands.The Vocational Guidance Quarterly 30(2):174–180.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. 1986.Literacy: Profiles of America’s young adults. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Smith, L. 1979.An evaluation of studies of long term effects of remedial reading programs. Ed.D. diss. Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.
Sticht, T. G., Caylor, J. S., Fox, L. C., Hauke, R. N., James, J. H. Snyder, S. S., and Kern, R. P. 1973.HumRRO’s literacy research for the U.S. Army: Developing functional literacy training. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.
United States, Bureau of the Census. 1970.1970 census. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
United States, Bureau of the Census. 1980.1980 census. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
What works. 1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based, in part, on an earlier paper, “New Views on Developing Basic Skills with Adults,” presented at the National Conference on Adult Literacy, Washington, D.C., January, 1984.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chall, J.S. Reading development in adults. Annals of Dyslexia 37, 240–251 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648070
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648070