Skip to main content
Log in

There is no such thing as environmental ethics

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Engineers and scientists, whose professional responsibilities often influence the natural environment, have sought to develop an environmental ethic that will be in tune with their attitudes toward the non-human environment, and that will assist them in decision making regarding questions of environmental quality. In this paper the classical traditions in normative ethics are explored in an attempt to formulate such an environmental ethic. I conclude, however, that because the discipline of ethics is directed at person-person interactions, ethics as a scholarly discipline does not help us understand how we ought to treat non-human nature. We therefore cannot look to ethics as a source for understanding our attitudes and for providing guidance to our actions with regard to the environment. To do so is to ask too much of ethics.

If we are to find an acceptable environmental morality, it must come from a new paradigm. One approach might be to understand our attitudes on the basis of spirituality, modeled after animistic religions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and references

  1. Witness for example the efforts of the American Society of Civil Engineers to develop the so-called “eighth canon” for its Code of Ethics. For a discussion of this, see Vesilind, P.A. (1995) “Evolution of the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Code of Ethics”,Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering and Education ASCE121:4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rawls, J. (1972)A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, p.512.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aristotle,Politic, transl. by Rachham, H. (1944) Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Immanuel Kant, “Duties Toward Animals and Spirits” in Lecture on Ethics, p.240, as quoted by Midgley, M. “Duties Concerning Islands”, in Elliot, R. and Gare, A. (eds) (1983)Environmental Philosophy, Pennsylvania State University Press, State College, PA.

  5. Baxter, Wm.F. (1974)People or Penguins: The Case for Optimal Pollution, Columbia University Press, New York, p.5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Locke, J. (1693)Some Thoughts Concerning Education, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Whitlock, E.S. and Westerlund, S. R., “Humane Education: An Overview”, National Association for the Advancement of Humanc Education, Tulsa, Oklahoma, quoted in Fox, M.A. (1986)The Case for Animal Experimentation, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, p.75.

  8. Gert, B. (1988)Morality, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, p.89.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rawls, J. (1972) ibid., p. 510.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sessions, G. (1985) “Western Process Metaphysics: Heraclitus, Whitchead, and Spinoza” in Devall, B. and Sessions, G. (eds)Deep Ecology, Salt Lake City, UT.

  11. Bentham, J. (1823)An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, LaFleur, L. J. (ed) (1948), Hafner Publishing Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Singer, P. (1979)Practical Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matthews, E. (1989) “The Metaphysics of Environmentalism” in: Dower, N. (ed)Ethics and Environmental Responsibility. Avesbury, Aldershot, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gert, B. (1988)op. cit., p.90.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Warren, M-A. “The Rights of the Nonhuman World” in: Elliot, R. and Gare, A. (eds) (1983)op. cit., p.114.

  16. Fox, M.A. (1986)The Case for Animal Experimentation, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, p.66.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guthric, R.D. (1967) “The Ethical Relationship between Humans and Other Organisms”,Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 11:52–62

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schweitzer, A. (1949)Out of My Life and Thought: An Autobiography, H. Holt, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson, J. (1990) “A Refutation of Environmental Ethics”,Environmental Ethics 12:147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor, P.W. (1986)Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leopold, A. (1949)The Sand County Almanac, Oxford University Press, New York, p.203.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shrader-Frachette, K. and McCoy, E., quoted in Westra, L. (1994)An Environmental Proposal for Ethics, Brown and Littlefield, Lantham MD, p. 52.

  23. Lovelock, J. (1979)Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth, Oxford University Press, Oxford UK.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Callicott, J. B. (1989)In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy, State University of New York Press, Albany, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Routley, R. and Routley, V. (1987) “Against the Inevitability of Human Chauvinism”, in: Goodpaster, K. and Sayre, K. (eds) (1987)Ethics and the Problems of the 21st Century, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rolston III, H. (1988)Environmental Ethics, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Naess, A. (1985) “Basic Principles of Deep Ecology”, in: Devall, B. and Sessions, G. (eds) (1985)Deep Ecology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

  28. Routley, R. and Routley, V. (1980) “Human Chauvinism and Environmental Ethics” in: Mannison, D., McRobbie, M. and Routley, R. (eds) (1980)Environmental Philosophy, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Paulson, I. (1971)The Old Estonian Folk Religions, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vesilind, P.A. There is no such thing as environmental ethics. Sci Eng Ethics 2, 307–318 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583916

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583916

Key Words

Navigation