Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution and activity of bacteria in deep granitic groundwaters of southeastern sweden

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the distribution of bacteria in groundwater from 16 different levels in five boreholes in granite bedrock down to a maximum of 860 m. Enrichment cultures were used to assay the groups of bacteria present. Autoradiographic studies with14C- or3H-labeled formate, methanol, acetate, lactate, glucose, sodium bicarbonate, leucine, glutamine, thymidine, orN-acetyl-glucosamine were used to obtain information about bacteria active in substrate uptake. The biofilm formation potential was studied in one borehole. The chemical environment in the groundwater was anaerobic with an Eh between −112 and −383 mV, a pH usually around 8, and a temperature range of 10.2 to 20.5°C, depending on the depth. The organic content ranged between <0.5 and 9.5 mg total organic carbon liter−1. Carbon dioxide, hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide, and methane were present in the water. The nitrate, nitrite, and phosphate concentrations were close to, or below, the detection limits, while there were detectable amounts of NH +4 in the range of 4 to 330 μg liter−1. The average total number of bacteria was 2.6×105 bacteria ml−1, as determined with an acridine organge direct-count (AODC) technique. The average number of bacteria that grew on a medium with 1.5 g liter−1 of organic substrate was 7.7×103 colony-forming units (CFU) ml−1. The majority of these were facultatively anaerobic, gram-negative, nonfermenting heterotrophs. Enrichment cultures indicated the presence of anaerobic bacteria capable of growth on C-1 compounds and hydrogen, presumably methanogenic bacteria. Most probable number assays with sulfate and lactate revealed up to 5.6×104 viable sulfate-reducing bacteria per ml. A biofilm development experiment indicated an active attached microbial population. Active substrate uptake could not be registered with the bulk water populations, except for an uptake of leucine not associated with growth. The bulk water microbial cells in deep groundwater may be inactive cells detached from active biofilms on the rock surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alföldi L (1988) Groundwater microbiology: Problems and biological treatment—state-of-theart report. Wat Sci Technol 20:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beeman RE, Suflita JM (1987) Microbial ecology of a shallow unconfined groundwater aquifer polluted by municipal landfill leachate. Microb Ecol 14:39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beveridge TJ, Fyfe WS (1985) Metal fixation by bacterial cell walls. Can J Earth Sci 22:1893–1898

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bitton G, Marshall KC (1980) Adsorption of microorganisms to surfaces. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Characklis WG (1984) Biofilm development: A process analysis. In: Marshall KC (ed) Microbial adhesion and aggregation. Dahlem konferenzen 1984, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 137–157

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferris FG, Schultze S, Witten TC, Fyfe WS, Beveridge TJ (1989) Metal interactions with microbial biofilms in acidic and neutral pH environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:1249–1257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fliermans CB, Balkwill DL (1989) Microbial life in deep terrestrial subsurfaces. Bioscience 39: 370–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghiorse WC, Wilson JT (1988) Microbial ecology of the terrestrial sub-surface. Adv Appl Microbiol 33:107–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gustafson G, Stanfors R, Wikberg P (1988) Swedish hard rock laboratory first evaluation of prein vestigations 1986–1987 and target area characterization. SKB Technical report, 1988, 88–16, Stockholm. Available from SKB, Box 5864, 102 48 Stockholm, Sweden

  10. Gustafson G, Stanfors R, Wikberg P (1989) Swedish hard rock laboratory first evaluation of prein vestigations 1988 and target area characterization. SKB Technical report, 1989, 89-16,

  11. Hirsch P, Rades-Rohkohl E (1988) Some special problems in the determination of viable counts of groundwater microorganisms. Microb Ecol 16:99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S (1977) Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1225–1228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ingraham JL, Maalöe O, Neidharde FC (1983) Growth of the bacterial cell. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jardim WF, Pearson HW (1984) A study of the copper-complexing compounds released by some species of cyanobacteria. Wat Res 18:985–989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. KBS (1983) Final storage of spent nuclear fuel—KBS-3, Part I–IV, Report by Swedish Nuclear Fuel Supply Co, SKBF/KBS, Stockholm. Available from SKB, Box 5864, 102 48 Stockholm, Sweden, tel. 46-8-665 28 00

  16. Kirchman D, Ducklow H, Mitchell R (1982) Estimates of bacterial growth from changes in uptake rates and biomass. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:1296–1307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kjelleberg S, Hermansson M, M»rden P, Jones GW (1987) The-transient phase between growth and non growth of heterotrophic bacteria, with emphasis on the marine environment. Ann Rev Microbiol 41:25–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marshall KC (1984) Microbial adhesion and aggregation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marxsen J (1988) Investigations into the number of respiring bacteria in groundwater from sandy and gravelly deposits. Microb Ecol 16:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McFeters GA, Bazin MJ, Bryers JD, Caldwell DE, Characklis WG, Lund DB, Mirelman D, Mitchell R, Schubert RHW, Tanaka T, White DC (1984) Biofilm development and its consequences. Group report. In: Marshall KC (ed) Microbial adhesion and aggregation. Dahlem konferenzen 1984. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 109–124

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer-Reil L-A (1978) Autoradiography and epifluorescence microscopy combined for the determination of the number and spectrum of actively metabolizing bacteria in natural waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 36:506–512

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moriarty DJW (1986) Measurement of bacterial growth rates in aquatic systems from rates of nucleic acid synthesis. In: Marshall KC (ed) Advances in microbial ecology, vol 9, Plenum press, New York, pp 245–292

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oremland RS (1988) Biogeochemistry of methanogenic bacteria. In: Zehnder AJB (ed) Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 641–770

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ormeland RS, Policin S (1982) Methanogenesis and sulphate reduction: Competitive and non competitive substrates in estaurine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 44:1270–1276

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pedersen K, Holmström C, Olsson A-K, Pedersen A (1986) Statistic evaluation of the influence of species variation, culture conditions, surface wettability and fluid shear on attachment and biofilm development of marine bacteria. Arch Microbiol 145:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pedersen K (1990) Potential effects of bacteria on radionuclide transport from a Swedish high level nuclear waste repository. SKB technical report 90-05 Stockholm. Available from SKB, Box 5864, 102 48 Stockholm, Sweden, tel. 46-8-665 28 00

  27. Pedersen K (1990) Biofilm development on stainless steel and PVC surfaces in drinking water. Wat Res 24:239–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pfennig N, Widdel F, Truper HG (1981) The Dissimilatory sulphate-reducing bacteria. In: Starr MP, Stolp H, Truper MG, Balow A, Schlegel HG (eds) The Prokaryotes-A handbook of habitats, isolation and identification of bacteria, vol 1, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 865–893

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pollard PC, Moriarty DJW (1984) Validity of tritiated thymidine method for estimating bacterial growth rates: The measurement of isotope dilution during DNA synthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:1076–1083

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Polprasert C, Charnpratheep K (1989) Heavy metal removal in attached-growth waste stabilization ponds. Wat Res 23:625–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rudd T, Sterritt RM, Lester JN (1984) Formation and conditional stability constants of complexes formed between heavy metals and bacterial extracellular polymers. Wat Res 18: 379–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schoenen D, Schöler HF (1985) Drinking water materials. Field observations and methods of observation. Ellis Horwood Limited, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Strandberg GW, Starling E, Shumate II, Parrott JR (1981) Microbial cells as biosorbents for heavy metals: Accumulation of uranium bySaccharomyces cerevisiae andPseudomonas aerunginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol 41:237–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tabor PS, Neihof RA (1982) Improved microautoradiographic method to determine individual microorganisms active in substrate uptake in natural waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:945–953

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tiedje JM (1988) Ecology of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium. In: Zehnder AJB (ed) Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 179–244

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vaccaro RF (1969) The response of natural microbial populations in sea water to organic enrichment. Limnol Ocean 14:726–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Es FB, Meyer-Reil (1982) Biomass and metabolic activity of heterotrophic marine bacteria. In: Marshall KC (ed) Advances in microbial ecology, vol 6. Plenum Press, New York, pp 111–170

    Google Scholar 

  38. Van der Wende E, Characklis WG, Smith DB (1989) Biofilms and bacterial drinking water quality. Wat Res 23:1313–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. West JM, McKinley IG, Chapman NA (1982) Microbes in deep geological systems and their possible influence on radioactive waste disposal. Radioactive Waste Management Nuclear Fuel Cycle 3:1–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. West JM, Christofi N, McKinley IG (1985) An overview of recent microbiological research relevant to the geological disposal of nuclear waste. Radioactive Waste Management and the Nuclear Fuel Cycle 6:79–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Widdel F, Pfenning N (1981) Studies on dissimilatory sulphate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. I. Isolation of new sulphate-reducing bacteria enriched with acetate from saline environment. Description ofDesulfobacter postgatei gen. nov. sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 129:395–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wikberg P, Axelsen K, Fredlund F (1987) Deep groundwater chemistry. SKB Technical report, 1987, 87.07 Stockholm. Available from SKB, Box 5864, 102 48 Stockholm, Sweden, tel. 46-8-665 28 00

  43. Williams PJLEB, Gray RW (1970) Heterotrophic utilization of dissolved organic compounds in the sea. J Mar Biol Ass U.K. 50:871–881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Winfrey MR, Ward DM (1983) Substrates for sulphate reduction and methane production in intertidal sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:193–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pedersen, K., Ekendahl, S. Distribution and activity of bacteria in deep granitic groundwaters of southeastern sweden. Microb Ecol 20, 37–52 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02543865

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02543865

Keywords

Navigation