Skip to main content
Log in

Visual and phonological determinants of misreadings in a transparent orthography

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growth of word reading skills was examined in first and second year Italian school children by analysis of the pattern of reading errors. The study was designed to investigate the role of visual vs phonological similarities as causes of misreadings in a transparent orthography. The selection of reading material was tailored to permit a meaningful cross-language comparison with pre-existing findings on English-speaking children. The results showed that, in Italian as in English, spatially-related errors (such as confusingb andd) constituted a minor proportion of the total errors. Errors on vowel and consonant letters that are not spatially confusable accounted for the greater proportion of the total. Moreover, the co-occurrence of spatial and phonological confusability resulted in appreciably more errors than when either occurred without the other. Vowel position in the syllable had no systematic effect on errors. In beginning readers of Italian, consonant errors outnumbered vowel errors by a wide margin; the reverse pattern was found in previous studies on English-speaking children at the same level of schooling. It is proposed that differences between Italian and English in the phonological structure of the lexicon and in the consistency of grapheme-phoneme correspondences account in large part for the differences in quantity and distribution of the errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agard, F. B. & Di Pietro, R. J. (1965).The sounds of English and Italian, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, S. E. & Werker, J. F. (1989). Toward understanding the problem in severely disabled children, Part I: Vowel errors,Applied Psycholinguistics 10: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. (1992). Studies in the acquisition procedure for reading: Rationale, hypotheses, and data. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri & R. Treiman (eds.),Reading acquisition (pp. 1–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R., Elenius, K., Granstrom, C. & Hunnicut, S. (1985). Phonetic and orthographic properties of the basic vocabulary of five European languages,Quarterly Report (KTH Speech Transmission Laboratory, Stockholm) 1: 63–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968).The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Katz, L. & Tola, G. (1988). Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children,Applied Psycholinguistics 9: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, F. E., Magno-Caldognetto, Vagges, K. & Lavagnoli, C. (1978). Some acoustic characteristics of the Italian vowels,Journal of Italian Linguistics 3: 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. W., Liberman, I. Y. & Shankweiler, D. P. (1978). Reading reversal and developmental dyslexia: a further study,Cortex 14: 496–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C., Liberman, I. Y. & Shankweiler, D. (1977). On interpreting the error pattern in beginning reading,Language and Speech 20: 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J., Gibson, J. J., Pick, D. & Osser, R. A. (1962). Developmental study of the discrimination of letter-like forms,Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 55: 897–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. R. & Rozin, P. (1977). The structure and acquisition of reading: Relation between orthography and the structure of language. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (eds.),Toward a psychology of reading (pp. 1–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B. & Hillinger, M. L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act,Bulletin of the Orton Society 30: 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinshelwood, J. (1917).Congenital word blindness. London: H.K. Lewis & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, E. S. (1972). How alphabets might reflect language. In: J. F. Kavanagh and I. Mattingly (eds.),Language by ear and by eye (pp. 57–80). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I. & Shankweiler, D. (1980). Orthography and the beginning reader. In J. Kavanagh & R. Venezsky (eds.),Orthography, reading and dyslexia (pp. 137–154). Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (eds.),Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Orlando, C., Harris, K. S. & Bell-Berti, F. (1971). Letter confusions and reversals of sequence in the beginning reader: Implication for Orton's theory of Developmental Dyslexia,Cortex 7: 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, S. D., DeRenzi, E. & Richman, L. C. (1985). Cross-national comparisons of developmental dyslexia in Italy and the United States,Child Development 65: 1404–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A., Tobin, P. & Wilson, R. (1987). Measuring phonological awareness through the invented spellings of kindergarten children,Merrill Palmer Quarterly 33: 365–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayzner, M. S. & Tresselt, M. E. (1965). Tables of single-letter and diagram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations,Psychonomic Monograph Supplements 1(2): 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ognjenovic, V., Lukatela, G., Feldman, L. & Turvey, M. T. (1983). Misreadings by beginning readers of Serbo-Croatian,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 35: 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, S. T. (1925). ‘Word blindness’ in school children,Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 14: 581–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, S. T. (1937).Reading, writing and speech problems in children. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. E. & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in the study of the vowels,The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 24: 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D. P. & Liberman, I. Y. (1972). Misreading: a search for causes. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. Mattingly (eds.),Reading by ear and by eye (pp. 293–317). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simner, M. (1982). Printing errors in kindergarten and the prediction of academic performance,Journal of Learning Disabilities 15: 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. (1985). Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: what have we learned?Annals of Dyslexia 35: 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. (1987). Dyslexia,Scientific American 256: 34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R. (1970).The structure of English orthography. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werker, J.F., Bryson, S. E. & Wassenberg, K. (1989). Toward understanding the problem in severely disabled readers, Part II: Consonant errors,Applied Pscholinguistics 10: 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system,Applied Psycholinguistics 14: 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I.Y. et al. Visual and phonological determinants of misreadings in a transparent orthography. Read Writ 7, 237–256 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02539523

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02539523

Key words

Navigation