Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of phytoplankton control by large-bodied and small-bodied zooplankton

  • Part Two: Zooplankton-Phytoplankton Interactions
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Employingin situ enclosures containing inocula of the lake zooplankton (mainlyDaphnia galeata, Daphnia cucullata andBosmina spp.) from a moderately eutrophic Lake Ros (Northern Poland) or large-bodiedDaphina magna, the following observations on succession of phytoplankton were made: 1) whereasD. magna could control the density of all the photoplankton size classes, the lake zooplankton could not suppress the large-sized phytoplankters or net phytoplankton; 2) the lake zooplankton was able to control the density of small algae (< 50µm), but its effect on large algae may be opposite: a promotion of net phytoplankton growth by removing small-sized algae which can out-compete net phytoplankton for limited PO4-P resources (<5µg P l−1).

Since efficiency of phytoplankton density control byD. magna decreased with an increase in net phytoplankton abundance, biomanipulation could not be successful without introducing or maintaining a high population of large-bodied cladoceran species before high densities of large algae would make the control of phytoplankton inefficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benndorf, J., H. Kneschke, K. Kossatz & E. Penz, 1984. Manipulation of the pelagic food web by stocking with predacious fishes. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 69: 407–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., J. F. Kitchell & F. R. Hodgson, 1985. Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. Bioscience 35: 634–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawidowicz, P., 1989. Conditions which must be fullfilled to allow effective control of phytoplankton by zooplankton. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Warsaw, Warszawa, 48 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawidowicz, P. & Z. M. Gliwicz, 1987. Biomanipulation. II. The role of direct and indirect relationship between photoplankton and zooplankton. Wiad. ekol. 33: 259–277 (in Polish, English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawidowicz, P., Z. M. Gliwicz & R. D. Gulati, 1988. CanDaphnia prevent a blue-green algal bloom in hypertrophic lakes? A laboratory test. Limnologica (Berlin) 19: 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. A. & F. H. Rigler, 1984. A manual on methods for the assesment of secondary productivity in fresh waters. IBP Handbook 17, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 501 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, W. & H. Müller, 1981. The filtration apparatus of Cladocera: Filter mesh-sizes and their implications on food selectivity. Oecologia (Berl.) 49: 316–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz, Z. M., 1977. Food size selection and seasonal succession of filter feeding zooplankton in an eutrophic lake. Ekol. pol. 25: 179–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz, Z. M. & E. Siedlar, 1980. Food size limitation and algae interfering with food collection inDahpnia. Arch. Hydrobiol. 88: 155–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golterman, H. L. & R. S. Clymo, 1969. Methods for chemical analysis for fresh waters. IBP Handbook 8, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 172 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, J. F., 1987. Field studies on zooplankton-cyanobacteria interactions. N. Zeal. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 21: 467–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargrave, B. T. & G. H. Geen, 1968. Phosphorus excretion by zooplankton. Limnol. Ocreanogr. 13: 332–342.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, W., 1988. The relationship between zooplankton biomass and grazing: A review. Limnologica (Berlin) 19: 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, J. T., 1980a. Nutrient recycling as an interface between algae and grazers in freshwater communities. In W. C. Kerfoot (ed.), Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. The University Press of New England, Hanover (N.H.); Lond.: 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. S., 1984. The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, New York, New Rochelle, Melbourne, Sydney, 384 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J., 1980. The importance of trophic-level interactions to the abundance and species composition of algae in lakes. Dev. Hydrobiol. 2: 105–116.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. & D. I. Wright, 1984. Lake restoration by biomanipulation: Round Lake, Minnesota, the first two years. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J., V. Lammara & M. Lynch, 1975. Biomanipulation: An ecosystem approach to lake restoration. In P. L. Brezonik & J. L. Fox (eds), Proc. Symp. Water quality management through biological control. Rep. No. ENV-07-75-1, University of Florida, Gainsville: 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, K. E. & R. H. Peters, 1977. Some size-dependent inhibition of larger cladoceran filterers in filamentous suspension. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23: 1238–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dawidowicz, P. Effectiveness of phytoplankton control by large-bodied and small-bodied zooplankton. Hydrobiologia 200, 43–47 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530327

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530327

Key words

Navigation