Skip to main content
Log in

Risk-sensitive foraging: A review of the theory

  • Behavioural Ecology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature

  • Barnard, C. J., C. A. J. Brown, A. I. Houston and J. M. McNamara. 1985. Risk-sensitive foraging in common shrews: an interruption model and the effects of mean and variance in reward rate.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraco, T. 1981. Risk-sensitivity and foraging groups.Ecology 62, 527–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraco, T. and M. Chasin. 1984. Foraging preferences: response to reward skew.Anim. Behav. 32, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraco, T. and C. Kelly. 1991. On the adaptive value of physiological integration in clonal plants.Ecology 71, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. W. 1987. The lazy adaptable lions: a Markovian model of group foraging.Anim. Behav. 35, 361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. W. and M. Mangel. 1984. Foraging and flocking strategies: information in an uncertain environment.Am. Nat. 123, 626–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. W. and M. Mangel. 1986. The evolutionary advantages of group foraging.Theor. Popul. Biol. 12, 45–75.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid.Am. Nat. 110, 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, J. and B. Rosander. 1987. Starvation risk and flock size of the social forager: when there is a flocking cost.Theor. Popul. Biol. 31, 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellner, S. and L. R. Real. 1989. Optimal foraging models for stochastic environments: Are we missing the point?Comments Theor. Biol. 1, 129–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantmacher, F. R. 1959.Matrix Theory. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, A. I. and J. M. McNamara. 1982. A sequential approach to risk-taking.Anim. Behav. 30, 1260–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, A. I. and J. M. McNamara. 1985. The choice of two prey types that minimises the probability of starvation.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17, 135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, A. I. and J. M. McNamara. 1986. Evaluating the selection pressure on foraging decisions. InRelevance of Models and Theories in Ethology, R. Campan and R. Zayan (Eds), pp. 61–75. Toulouse, France: Privat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, A. I. and J. M. McNamara. 1990. The effct of environmental variability on growth.Oikos 59, 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. P. 1978. On sets of countable non-negative matrices and Markov decision processes.Adv. Appl. Prob. 10, 63–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangel, M. and C. W. Clark. 1988.Dynamic Models in Behavioral Ecology. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. M. 1983. Optimal control of the diffusion coefficient of a simple diffusion process.Math. Oper. Res. 8, 373–380.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. M. 1984. Control of a diffusion by switching between two drift-diffusion coefficient pairs.SIAM J. Cont. 22, 87–94.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. M. 1990. The policy which maximizes long-term survival of an animal faced with the risks of starvation and predation.Adv. Appl. Prob. 22, 295–308.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. M. and A. I. Houston. 1982. Short-term behaviour and life-time fitness. InFunctional Ontogeny, D. J. McFarland (Ed.), pp. 60–87. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. M. and A. I. Houston. 1986. The common currency for behavioural decisions.Am. Nat. 127, 358–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. M. and A. I. Houston. 1987. A general framework for understanding the effects of variability and interruptions on foraging behaviour.Acta Biotheor. 36, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. M. and A. I. Houston. 1990a. Starvation and predation in a patchy environment. InLiving in a Patchy Environment, B. Shorrocks and I. R. Swingland (Eds), pp. 23–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. M. and A. I. Houston. 1990b. The state-dependent ideal free distribution.Evol. Ecol. 4, 298–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. M., S. Merad and A. I. Houston. 1991. A model of risk-sensitive foraging for a reproducing animal.Anim. Behav. 41, 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merad, S. 1991. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of Bristol.

  • Oster, G. F. and E. O. Wilson. 1978.Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H. R. and G. C. Millikan. 1982. Social organization in the non-reproductive season. InAvian Biology, Vol. 6, D. S. Farmer, J. R. King and K. C. Parkes (Eds), pp. 169–197. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Real, L. A. 1980. Fitness-uncertainty and the role of diversification in evolution and behaviour.Am. Nat. 115, 623–638.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Real, L. A. and T. Caraco. 1986. Risk and foraging in stochastic environments: theory and evidence.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W. 1981. The logic of risk-sensitive foraging preferences.Anim. Behav. 29, 628–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W. and J. R. Krebs. 1986.Foraging Theory. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, W. J. and C. W. Anderson. 1987. Six ways in which a foraging predator may encounter options with difference variances.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 30, 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, P. 1983.Optimization over Time, Vol. II. Chichester: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • zabludoff, S. D., J. Wecker and T. Caraco. 1988. Foraging choice in laboratory rats: constant vs. variable delay.Behav. Proc. 16, 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McNamara, J.M., Houston, A.I. Risk-sensitive foraging: A review of the theory. Bltn Mathcal Biology 54, 355–378 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464838

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464838

Keywords

Navigation