Skip to main content
Log in

Composite mesh (polypropylene-e-PTFE) in the intraperitoneal position

A report of 30 cases

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The treatment of incisional hernias, on occasions, imposes the use of an intraperitoneal prosthesis. Though none of the available biomaterials is entirely satifactory, the choice often reflects a compromise. Polypropylene and polyester have been associated with bowel obstruction, fistulization and transmigration through a viscus. These problems are almost unknown with e-PTFE. All three however can cause adhesions. On the other hand, the solidity of a repair is a function of the penetration of a prosthesis by fibroblasts and collagen. Polyester and polypropylene manifest such a penetration. e-PTFE less so. The combination of e-PTFE internally and polypropylene externally seems to provide a reasonable composite which has been used in 30 cases in the last six years. During that period no patient presented with an intestinal occlusion or fistula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adloff M, Arnaud JP (1987) Surgical management of large incisional hernias by an intraperitoneal mersilene mesh and an aponeurotic graft. Surg Gynecol Obstet 165: 204–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amid PK, Shulman A, Lichtenstein I (1992) Selecting synthetic mesh for the repair of groin hernias. Post Grad Gen Surg 4: 150–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein I (1994) Experimental evaluation of a new composite mesh with the selective property of incorporation to the abdominal wall without adhering to the intestine. J Biom Mat Res 28: 373–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amid PK, Lichtenstein, I, Shulman A (1995) Evaluation preliminaire de materiels composites pour la reparation des eventrations. Ann Chir 49: 539–543

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Annibali R, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr (1994) Prosthetic materials and adhesion formation. In: Arregui MA, Nagan RF (eds) Inguinal hernia: advances or controversies. Radcliffe Med Press, Oxford New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer JL, Salky BA, Gelernt M (1987) Repair of large abdominal wall defects with e-PTFE. Ann Surg 206: 765–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW (1996) Prevention of post-operative abdominal adhesions by a Sodium Hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 183: 297–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bendavid R (1989) Femoral hernias: primary vs. recurrence. Int Surg 74: 99–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeon R, Borelli JP, Lanfranchi JB (1972) Utilisation des prothèses de mersilène dans le traitement des éventrations post-opératoires. Ann Chir 26: 541–545

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breland U, Bengmark S (1989) Peritoneum and adhesion formation. In: Bengmark S (ed) The peritoneum and peritoneal access. Wright, London, pp 122–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GL, Richardson JD, Malangoni MA (1985) Comparison of prosthetic materials for abdominal wall reconstruction in the presence of contamination and infection. Ann Surg 201: 705–711

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton LT (1985) Cannibalization of a Gore-Tex aorto-hepatic graft by the duodenum (letter). Br J Surg 6: 499

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufilho A (1981) Les complications des prothèses en tulle de Dacron. A propos de 414 observations. Thèse Med, Paris

  • Ellis H (1962) The etiology of post-operative abdominal adhesions, an experimental study. Br J Surg 50: 10–16

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis H (1971) The cause and prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 133: 497–511

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Camps J, Cornet DA (1995) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg 221: 3–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francioni G (1994) Prosthetics: their complications & management. In: Bendavid R (ed) Prostheses and abdominal wall hernia. Landes, Austin, TX, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • George CD, Ellis H (1986) The results of incisional hernia repair: a 12 year review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 68: 185–187

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg JM, Toledo AA, Mitchell DE (1987) An evaluation of the Gore-Tex surgical membrane for the prevention of post-operative peritoneal adhesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 70: 846–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins SD, Klamer TW, Parteka J, Condon RE (1983) A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects. Surgery 94: 392–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman Z, Engelberg M, Zager M (1981) Fecal fistula: a late complication of Marlex mesh repair. Dis Colon Rectum 24: 543–544

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb JP, Vitale T, Kaminski DL (1983) Comparative evaluation of synthetic meshes used for abdominal wall replacement. Surgery 93: 643–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Law NH, Ellis H (1988) Adhesion formation and peritoneal healing on prosthetic materials. Clin Mater 3: 95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan RA, Meban S (1991) e-PTFE patch in hernia repair. A review of clinical experience. Can J Surg 34: 502–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JL, Freeman JB, Dionne PG (1989) Comparison of Marlex and Gore-Tex to repair abdominal wall defects in the rat. Can J Surg 32: 244–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery AT (1979) Regeneration of Peritoneum. A fibrinolytic study. J Anat 129: 659–664

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider R, Herrington JL Jr, Granada AM (1979) The mesh repair of a diaphragmatic defect later on in the distal esophagus and stomach. Am Surg 45: 337–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slim K, Ben Slimene T, Largueghe S (1989) Le traitement des éventrations post-operatoires de la paroi abdominale. Intérêt de la prothèse de mersilene. Tunis Med 67: 481–485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoppa RE, Louis D, Henry X, Verhaeghe P (1985) Les éventrations post-opératoires. A propos d'une serie de 247 opéres. Chir (Paris) 111: 303–305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoppa RE (1995) Errors, difficulties and complications in hernia repairs using the GPRVS. Prob Gen Surg 12: 1399–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JS, Williams SM (1984) Fistula following continent ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 27: 193–195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toy FK (1994) Rationale for the use of e-PTFE in the intraperitoneal position. In: Arregui ME, Nagan RF (eds) Inguinal hernia: advances or controversies. Radcliffe Med Press, Oxford New York, pp 125–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher FC, Ochsner J, Tuttle LL Jr (1958) Use of Marlex in the repair of incisional hernias. Am Surg 24: 969–974

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usher FC, Allen JE Jr, Crosthwait RW (1962) Polypropylene monofilament: a new biologically inert suture for closing contaminated wounds. JAMA 179: 780–782

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Lei B, Bleichroot RP, Simmermacher RK (1989) e-PTFE patch for the repair of large abdominal wall defects. Br J Surg 76: 803–805

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wantz G (1991) Incisional hernioplasty with mersilene. Surg Gynecol Obstet 172: 129–137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bendavid, R. Composite mesh (polypropylene-e-PTFE) in the intraperitoneal position. Hernia 1, 5–8 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426380

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426380

Key words

Navigation