Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing landscape dynamics in a protected area

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes an approach to assessing spatial and temporal land-use and land-cover changes in and adjacent to protected areas and to the measurement of landscape stability within a protected area. Methods employed include aerial photographic interpretation and GIS technology. Odum's four-compartment ecosystem model provides the conceptual framework for assessing landscape stability. The study area is a selected sample of the Upper San Pedro National Riparian Conservation Area in the high desert grassland of southeastern Arizona. Significant changes were observed in the landscape matrix and riparian ecosystem. However, when these changes were assessed in the context of Odum's model, the change was nonsignificant. Implications of the approach and potential applications in protected area management are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Brown, D. E., G. H. Lowe, and C. P. Pase. 1980. A digitized systematic classification for ecosystems with an illustrated summary of the natural vegetation of North America. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-73. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Co. 93 pp.

  • Davis, F. W., D. M. Stoms, J. E. Estes, J. Scepan, and J. M. Scott. 1990. An information system approach to the preservation of biological diversity.International Journal of Geographical Information Systems. 4(1):55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabos, J., and W. Hendrix. 1981. Regional ecosystem assessment: An aid for ecologically compatible land use planning. Proceedings, International Congress, Netherlands Society of Landscape Ecology, Vedhoven, 1981. Pudoc, Wageningen, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. C. (Chair). 1989. National parks: From vignettes to a global view. Commission on Research and Resource Management Policy in the National Park System. National Parks and Conservation Association. 13 pp.

  • Hastings, J. R., and R. M. Turner. 1965. The changing mile. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 317 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, R., and E. W. Montroll. 1972. A manner of characterizing the development of countries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 69(10):3019–3023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeister, D., and W. Goodpaster. 1954. The mammals of the Huachuca Mountains, southeastern Arizona.Illinois Biological Monographs 24(1):1–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, L. D. 1977. Methods for generating land use suitability maps: A comparative evaluation.American Institute of Planning Journal 43:386–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, R. J., P. R. Ogden, and K. E. Foster. 1975. Southern Arizona riparian habitat: Spatial distribution and analysis. In cooperation with the Natural Resources Committee, Arizona State Senate. School of Renewable Natural Resources and Office of Arid Lands Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. 148 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development.Science 164:262–270.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siedlecki, W., K. Siedlecka, and J. Sklansky. 1988. An overview of mapping techniques for exploratory pattern analysis.Pattern Recognition 21(5):411–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. 1964. Species density of North American recent mammals.Systematic Zoology 13:57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. R., and J. B. Theberge. 1986. A review of criteria for evaluating natural areas.Environmental Management 10(6):715–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E. (ed.). 1986. Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, D. C. 1986. The IBM personal computer version of the Map Analysis Package. Laboratory for Computer Graphics and Spatial Analysis, Harvard Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDI Bureau of Land Management. 1986. Draft San Pedro River Conservation Area interim management guidelines. Bureau of Land Management Safford District Office. March 17. 23 pp.

  • USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. 1978. Concept plan: unique wildlife ecosystems, Arizona, Washington, DC. 40 pp.

  • Zube, E., S. K. Friedman, and D. E. Simcox. 1989. Landscape change: Perceptual and physical measures.Environmental Management 13(5):639–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Archbold Biological Station, 33852, Lake Placid, Florida, USA

    Steven K. Friedman

  2. School of Renewable Natural Resources, University of Arizona, 85721, Tucson, Arizona, USA

    Ervin H. Zube

Authors
  1. Steven K. Friedman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ervin H. Zube
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, S.K., Zube, E.H. Assessing landscape dynamics in a protected area. Environmental Management 16, 363–370 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02400075

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02400075

Key words

Search

Navigation